본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

카자흐스탄의 국가경쟁력과 외국인직접투자

National Competitiveness of Kazakhstan and Foreign Direct Investment

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류종교학

초록

This study analyzes and assesses the national competitiveness of Kazakhstan by generalized double diamond model developed from Porter’s diamond model and discusses the role of foreign direct investment in the national competitiveness in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan has passed about 20years from soviet plan economy to market economy and during that period,Kazakhstan received a lot of FDI by open market policy. Especially, the oil,gas, and mineral sectors occupy the most of FDI to Kazakhstan. Analyzing the competitiveness of Kazakhstan by generalized double diamond model, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, firm strategy, structure, and rivalry, and overseas factor conditions have comparative advantages to other Eastern Europe countries and CIS countries excepting domestic factor conditions. In domestic factor conditions, the national competitiveness is comparatively low because, wage increase is high and investment on engineers and scientists is low. To improve national competitiveness of Kazakhstan, FDI should be diversified in other manufacturing areas not only in oil and gas areas, and should be focused on human resources as scientists and engineers that induce technology transfer. Kazakhstani government should maintain and improve legal structure for investors to keep FDI inflow steadily and induce infrastructure investment to construct industrial development conditions.

Abstract

This study analyzes and assesses the national competitiveness of Kazakhstan by generalized double diamond model developed from Porter’s diamond model and discusses the role of foreign direct investment in the national competitiveness in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan has passed about 20years from soviet plan economy to market economy and during that period,Kazakhstan received a lot of FDI by open market policy. Especially, the oil,gas, and mineral sectors occupy the most of FDI to Kazakhstan. Analyzing the competitiveness of Kazakhstan by generalized double diamond model, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, firm strategy, structure, and rivalry, and overseas factor conditions have comparative advantages to other Eastern Europe countries and CIS countries excepting domestic factor conditions. In domestic factor conditions, the national competitiveness is comparatively low because, wage increase is high and investment on engineers and scientists is low. To improve national competitiveness of Kazakhstan, FDI should be diversified in other manufacturing areas not only in oil and gas areas, and should be focused on human resources as scientists and engineers that induce technology transfer. Kazakhstani government should maintain and improve legal structure for investors to keep FDI inflow steadily and induce infrastructure investment to construct industrial development conditions.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 김중관, "카자흐스탄의 경제발전과 체제전환에 대한 분석", 한국이슬람학회논총, 16(2), pp.187~208 (2006), 한국이슬람학회
  2. 마이클 포터, "국가경쟁우위" (2009), 21세기 북스
  3. 박지원, "러시아 기업의 CIS 직접투자: 배경과 투자동인", 중소연구, 35(3), pp.223~255 (2011), 아태지역연구센터
  4. 정진섭, "한·미 FTA와 한국의 FDI 유치전략", 무역학회지, 33(3), pp.185~216 (2008), 한국무역학회
  5. Aizhan, K, "Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth in Kazakhstan", International Conference on Sociality and Economics Development, 10, pp.414~419 (2011), IPEDR
  6. Aschauer, D. A, "Is Public Expenditure Productive?", Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, pp.177~200 (1989)
  7. How Foreign Investment Affects Host Countries, "Blomström, M", The World Bank, 1~44, pp.Policy Research Working Paper 1745 (1997)
  8. Inappropriate Pooling of Wealthy and Poor Countries in Empirical FDI Studies, "Blonigen, B. A", NBER, 1~29, pp.NBER Working Paper 10378 (2004)
  9. Kazakhstan’s Emerging Middle Class, In Silk Road Paper, "Daly, J. C. K", 1~99 (2008)
  10. Dunning, J. H, "Re-evaluating the benefits of foreign direct investment", Transnational Corporations, 3(1), pp.1~17 (1994)
  11. Globerman, S, "Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment", Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), pp.19~39 (2003)
  12. Krugman, P, "Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession", ForeignAffairs, pp.28~44 (1994)
  13. Michael, R. T, "Education and Consumption, In Education, Income, and Human Behavior", pp.233~252 (1975), NBER
  14. 문휘창, "Comparing the Competitiveness of Korea and Singapore after Ten Years of Asian Economic Crisis", 경영사학, 25(1), pp.75~91 (2010), 한국경영사학회
  15. Moon, H. C, "A generalized double diamond approach to the global competitiveness of Korea and Singapore", International Business Review, 7, pp.135~150 (1998)
  16. Noorbakhsh, F, "Human Capital and FDI Inflows to Developing Countries: New Empirical Evidence", World Development, 29(9), pp.1593~1610 (2001)
  17. The Role of Communication Infrastructure Investment in Economic Recovery, "OECD", OECD, 1~39 (2000)
  18. OECD, "Foreign Direct Investment in Kazakhstan", OECD Global Forum on International Investment, pp.1~9 (2001)
  19. OECD-ILO, "The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Wages and Working Conditions", OECD-ILO conference on corporate social responsibility, pp.1~31 (2008)
  20. Peng, M. W, "Global Business, 2nd Edition" (2010), South-Western Cengage Learning
  21. Porter, M. E, "The Competitive Advantage of Nations", Harvard Business Review, pp.73~91 (1990)
  22. Ramamurti, R, "Rethinking foreign infrastructure investment in developing countries", Journal of World Business, 39, pp.151~167 (2004)
  23. Rugman, A. M, "Porter Takes the Wrong Turn", Business Quarterly, 56(3), pp.59~64 (1992)
  24. Rugman, A. M, "How to Operationalize Porter’s Diamond of International Competitiveness", The International Executive, 35(4), pp.283~299 (1993)
  25. Schnitzer, M, "Debt v. Foreign Direct Investment: The Impact of Sovereign Risk on the Structure of International Capital Flows", Economica, 69, pp.41~67 (2002)
  26. Smit, A. J, "The competitive advantage of nations: is Porter’s Diamond Framework a new theory that explains the international competitiveness of nations?", Southern African Business Review, 14(1), pp.105~130 (2010)
  27. Tomohara, A, "Does globalization benefit developing countries? Effects of FDI on local wages", Journal of Policy Modeling, 33, pp.511~521 (2011)
  28. World Investment Report 2011: Non-Equity Modes of International Production and Development, "UNCTAD", 1~226 (2011)
  29. Expansion or Exodus? - Trends and Developments in Foreign Investments of Russia’s Largest Industrial Enterprises, "Vahtra, P", Pan European Institute, 1~47 (2006)
  30. World Bank, "Regional Profile: Eastern Europe and Central Asia", 1~102 (2012)
  31. The Global Competitiveness Report2010-2011, "World Economic Forum", SRO-Kundig, 1~500 (2010)
  32. "람스토어 카자흐스탄 홈페이지"[URL]
  33. "메트로 홈페이지"[URL]
  34. "주 카자흐스탄 네덜란드 대사관 홈페이지"[URL]
  35. "카자흐스탄 나자르바예프 대통령 홈페이지"[URL]
  36. "Kazakhstan: The Emerging Middle Class Thinks Money, Not Democracy"[URL]
  37. "Fitch upgrades Kazakhstan on rising oil production"[URL]
  38. "The World Competitiveness Scoreboard 2011"[URL]
  39. "МРП и прожиточном минимуме на 1995 - 2012 годы"[URL]
  40. "Транспортная Стратегия Республики Казахстан"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)