고대 그리스 희극의 두 여주인공이 추구한 연극적 행동과 정치적 시가로서의 의미 － 뤼시스트라테와 여인들의 민회를 중심으로
The Meaning of the Political Poetry and Dramatic Actions Pursued by Two Female Protagonists in ancient Greek comedies － Focusing on Lysistrata and Assemblywomen
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Focusing on Lysistrata and Assemblywomen, this paper investigates how the dramatic action is reshaped as political poetry. In addition, it reveals the writer’s philosophy and a commitment of the two works as political poets in the Athens war crisis by examining dramatic action pursued by two female protagonists, Lysistrata and Praxagora. Aristophanes publicly criticizes the government’s political line, turning his comedies into poltiical poetry to reform the society. Through the two female protagonists, Lysistrata and Assemblywomen criticizes the historical past and present and confront the rigidity of a male-dominated society Lysistrata creates audience’s laughter by comically treating a man-and-woman confrontation, reflections on women’s values from male oppression, and overthrowing the gender role. Lysistrata is a self-centered woman who threw herself to solve the gender concept of femininity in the ancient Greek patriarchal system with a new way of gender equality. Assemblywomen focuses on the critical view of Utopia, which translates into a view of social changes. In this work, Utopia is frustrated by human inequality, selfishness, and other errors and weaknesses, and human imperfections. The meaning of dramatic actions through the two heroines is to lead changes in the critical paradigm of literature by bravely trying to make a verbal satire that can convey the problems of the destitute reality. The commonality of humor between the two works is that the audience gets a sense of freedom from the frustration of a repressive and authoritative society. And it provides a healthy laughter by expressing the humble nature of wrapping imperfect human as perfect in satire and humor.
Abstract
Focusing on Lysistrata and Assemblywomen, this paper investigates how the dramatic action is reshaped as political poetry. In addition, it reveals the writer’s philosophy and a commitment of the two works as political poets in the Athens war crisis by examining dramatic action pursued by two female protagonists, Lysistrata and Praxagora. Aristophanes publicly criticizes the government’s political line, turning his comedies into poltiical poetry to reform the society. Through the two female protagonists, Lysistrata and Assemblywomen criticizes the historical past and present and confront the rigidity of a male-dominated society Lysistrata creates audience’s laughter by comically treating a man-and-woman confrontation, reflections on women’s values from male oppression, and overthrowing the gender role. Lysistrata is a self-centered woman who threw herself to solve the gender concept of femininity in the ancient Greek patriarchal system with a new way of gender equality. Assemblywomen focuses on the critical view of Utopia, which translates into a view of social changes. In this work, Utopia is frustrated by human inequality, selfishness, and other errors and weaknesses, and human imperfections. The meaning of dramatic actions through the two heroines is to lead changes in the critical paradigm of literature by bravely trying to make a verbal satire that can convey the problems of the destitute reality. The commonality of humor between the two works is that the audience gets a sense of freedom from the frustration of a repressive and authoritative society. And it provides a healthy laughter by expressing the humble nature of wrapping imperfect human as perfect in satire and humor.
참고문헌 (28)
- Aristophanes, "아리스토파네스 희극전집2" (2010), 숲
- Henderson, Jeffrey, "AristophanesⅢ: Birds, Lysistrate, Women at the Thesmophoria" (2000), Harvard University Press
- Henderson, Jeffrey, "AristophanesⅣ: Frogs, Assemblywomen, Wealth" (2002), Harvard University Press
- 고전⋅르네상스드라마 한국학회, "그리스⋅로마극의 세계2" (2001), 동인
- 김용수, "연극이론의 탐구: 대립적인 시각들의 대화" (2002), 서강대학교출판부
- 류재국, "아리스토파네스 3대 평화극에 나타난 평화관－ 아카르나이의 사람들, 평화, 뤼시스트라테를 중심으로", 브레히트와 현대연극, (39), pp.29~57 (2018), 한국브레히트학회[DOI]
- 류재국, "아리스토파네스 희극에 나타난 현실비판의 철학적 의미에 관한 연구 -아곤과 파라바시스를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2018
- 류재국, "아리스토파네스 희극, 「개구리」로 본 신화의 정치학-개혁을 위한 신화의 변용과 연극적 행동", 사)세계신화연구소 심포지엄, 신화와 문학, pp.25~34 (2018)
- 류재국, "아리스토파네스 희극의 지향성에 관하여- 사회비판의 기능을 중심으로", 연극교육연구, 30(30), pp.65~96 (2017), 한국연극교육학회[DOI]
- 문혜경, "고전기 아테네 여성의 연극관람과 사회적 친교활동에 관한 담론", 서양고전학연구, 54(2), pp.65~91 (2015), 한국서양고전학회
- 서정혁, "희극적인 것과 사변적인 것 — 아리스토파네스의 희극에 대한 헤겔의 해석", 헤겔연구, (26), pp.95~120 (2009), 한국헤겔학회[DOI]
- 이상복, "연극과 정치-탈정치시대의 독일연극" (2013), 연극과 인간
- 이희원, "아리스토파네스의 리시스트라테 에 나타난여성과 연극성", 고전 르네상스 영문학, 16(2), pp.5~31 (2007), 한국고전중세르네상스영문학회[DOI]
- 임성철, "아리스토파네스의 희극과 사회비판 - ‘우스운 것’의 기능을 중심으로 -", 지중해지역연구, 18(3), pp.53~75 (2016), 지중해지역원[DOI]
- 임성철, "아리스토파네스의 『여인들의 민회』 571-710에 나타난 프락사고라의 정치 프로그램에 대한 의미 고찰", 철학∙사상∙문화, (23), pp.153~176 (2017), 동서사상연구소[DOI]
- 정현경, "웃음에 관한 몇 가지 성찰 - 해체와 새로운 인식", 카프카 연구, (21), pp.221~242 (2009), 한국카프카학회
- Aristoteles, "시학" (2014), 문예출판사
- 창조적 진화, "웃음", pp.동서문화사, 도덕과 종교의 두 원천
- Biles, Zachary P., "Aristophanes and the Poetics of Competition" (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Brockett, Oscar G., "연극개론" (2009), HS MEDIA
- Dover, K. J., "Aristophanes Comedy" (1972), The University of California Press
- Gouhier, Henri, "연극의 본질" (1996), 집문당
- Heath, Malcolm, "Political Comedy in Aristophanes", Hypomnemata, 87 (1987), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co KG
- Hulley, Karl K., "The Prologue of the Ecclesiazusae", The Classical Weekly, 46(9), pp.129~131 (1953)
- Hutchinson, G. O., "House Politics and City Politics in Aristophanes", The Classical Quarterly New Series, 61(1), pp.48~70 (2011)
- Platon, "국가⋅政體" (2005), 서광사
- Sifakis, G. M., "The Structure of Aristophanic Comedy", The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 112, pp.123~142 (1992)
- Zumbrunnen, John, "Fantasy, Irony, and Economic Justice in Aristophanes’Assemblywomen and Wealth", The American Political Science Review, 100, pp.319~333 (2006)