본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

러시아 투바지역 흉노 조사의 최근 연구 동향

Recent Research Trends of the Xiongnu Survey in Russia Tuva region

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

From the end of the 3rd century BC to the 1st century AD, the Xiongnu annexed the surrounding nomads through active wars with the Han dynasty, and played a major role in East-West exchanges in Eurasia. The research area of Xiongnu archaeological research has been steadily expanding in terms of the history of negotiations through the northern steppe road, starting from interest in the origins of the Korean people. However, despite this quantitative expansion of the research on the Xiongnu, the archaeological achievements of the investigation of the remains of the Xiongnu in Tuva, Russia are not well known. The reason that the Republic of Tuva became widely known in the world archaeological and historical circles was when the Arzhan-1 Kurgan was excavated. As the date through absolute dating was increased to around the 9th century BC, many possibilities were presented in the context of Eurasian archaeological research. On the other hand, the tombs of Terezin and Alatei, located on the left bank of the Yenisei River, are not large noble tombs, but various artifact of the Xiongnu period were recently discovered. Also, the method of burial of the deceased is similar to that of Scythian burial that has existed for a long time in the Tuva region. According to historical records, a new material culture and inhabitants were introduced into the Tuva region between the 2nd and 1st centuries BC, but the specific aspects of the transition period are unknown. How did archaeological migration and material culture change from this perspective? Also, research on how the complexes of relics found in tombs moved organically with the surrounding area is required. In addition, it is essential to study the development of animal patterns of Scythian, Uyuk, Kokel, and Ozen-Ala-Beligskiy that existed before the Xiongnu-Sarmatian period. The Republic of Tuva, Russia, is an area where much research is expected in terms of archeology in the transition period from Uyuk culture -> Scythian / Scythian -> Xiongnu period. In the future, it is thought that many research results will be derived if it is combined with the results of the Xiongnu investigations in Mongolia, Baikal coast, Ordos, South Siberia, and Altai.

Abstract

From the end of the 3rd century BC to the 1st century AD, the Xiongnu annexed the surrounding nomads through active wars with the Han dynasty, and played a major role in East-West exchanges in Eurasia. The research area of Xiongnu archaeological research has been steadily expanding in terms of the history of negotiations through the northern steppe road, starting from interest in the origins of the Korean people. However, despite this quantitative expansion of the research on the Xiongnu, the archaeological achievements of the investigation of the remains of the Xiongnu in Tuva, Russia are not well known. The reason that the Republic of Tuva became widely known in the world archaeological and historical circles was when the Arzhan-1 Kurgan was excavated. As the date through absolute dating was increased to around the 9th century BC, many possibilities were presented in the context of Eurasian archaeological research. On the other hand, the tombs of Terezin and Alatei, located on the left bank of the Yenisei River, are not large noble tombs, but various artifact of the Xiongnu period were recently discovered. Also, the method of burial of the deceased is similar to that of Scythian burial that has existed for a long time in the Tuva region. According to historical records, a new material culture and inhabitants were introduced into the Tuva region between the 2nd and 1st centuries BC, but the specific aspects of the transition period are unknown. How did archaeological migration and material culture change from this perspective? Also, research on how the complexes of relics found in tombs moved organically with the surrounding area is required. In addition, it is essential to study the development of animal patterns of Scythian, Uyuk, Kokel, and Ozen-Ala-Beligskiy that existed before the Xiongnu-Sarmatian period. The Republic of Tuva, Russia, is an area where much research is expected in terms of archeology in the transition period from Uyuk culture -> Scythian / Scythian -> Xiongnu period. In the future, it is thought that many research results will be derived if it is combined with the results of the Xiongnu investigations in Mongolia, Baikal coast, Ordos, South Siberia, and Altai.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 강인욱, "스키토-시베리아 문화의 기원과 러시아 투바의 아르잔 1호 고분", 중앙아시아연구, 20(1), pp.127~151 (2015), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  2. 국립중앙박물관, "몽골 흉노무덤 자료집성" (2008), 도서출판 성림
  3. 권오영, "한국에서 유라시아 문명교류사 연구의 성과와 과제", 헤리티지:역사와 과학, 48(3), pp.166~185 (2015), 국립문화유산연구원
  4. 권오영, "유라시아 쿠르간 연구의 토대 구축, 한국고고학의 기원론과 계통론", 제40회 한국고고학전국대회 자료집, pp.468~476 (2016)
  5. 김종일, "고고학에서 이주의 개념과 물질문화의 변이 –개념 및 서구사례를 중심으로", 제34회 한국고고학전국대회 자료집, pp.10~33 (2010)
  6. 김종일, "중앙 유라시아 스키타이 왕묘에 대한 연구", 2020 Asian Archaeology 학술심포지엄, pp.33~47 (2020)
  7. 김호동, "아틀라스 중앙유라시아사" (2016), 사계절
  8. 박아림, "고구려 고분벽화 유라시아 문화를 품다" (2015), 학연문화사
  9. 장은정, "匈奴係 銅鍑의 製作과 擴散", 중앙아시아연구, 18(2), pp.141~160 (2013), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  10. 장은정, "북방고고학개론", pp.514~535 (2018), 진인진
  11. 장은정, "흉노고고학개론", pp.186~221 (2018), 진인진
  12. 정석배, "先흉노-스키타이 세계의 묘제", 한국전통문화논총, 1, pp.185~240 (2003)
  13. 주경미, "몽골 출토 흉노시대 금속공예품 연구", 신라문화, (37), pp.179~217 (2011), 신라문화연구소
  14. 주경미, "몽골 흉노고분 출토 금공품의 기원과 영향, 한국고고학의 신지평", 제38회 한국고고학전국대회 발표집, pp.491~501 (2014)
  15. 주경미, "흉노고고학개론", pp.292~331 (2018), 진인진
  16. 양시은, "몽골지역 흉노시대 분묘연구", 중앙고고연구, (22), pp.67~94 (2017), 중앙문화유산연구원[DOI]
  17. 윤형원, "광활한 몽골초원과 흉노인의 생존 - 고고학 증거를 중심으로 -", 중앙아시아연구, 15, pp.29~54 (2010), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  18. 윤형원, "몽골 흉노고고학의 성과와 전망, 한국고고학의 신지평", 제38회 한국고고학 전국대회 자료집, pp.375~382 (2014)
  19. 윤형원, "흉노고고학개론", pp.12~21 (2018), 진인진
  20. 에렉젠 G, "흉노" (2017), 진인진
  21. 오세연, "칸의 제국 몽골", pp.228~232 (2018), 국립중앙박물관
  22. Anderson, J.G, "Hunting magic in the animal style Bulletin, 4" (1932), MEFEA
  23. Boardman, J, "The relief plaques of eastern Eurassia and China" (2010), British Archaeological Reports
  24. Bunker, E, "Nomadic Art of the eastern eurasian steppes" (2002), The Metropolitan Museum of Art
  25. Chugunov, K.V, "Tsarskiy kurgan skifskogo vremeni Arzhan-2 v Tuve" (2017), Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences press
  26. Devlet, M.A, "Sibirskiye poyasnyye azhurnyye plastiny Ⅱ v do n.e -Ⅰ v. n.e", Arkheologiya USSR Svod arkheologicheskikh istochnikov D, 4(7), pp.5~36 (1980)
  27. Eregzen, G, "Treasure of the Xiongnu" (2011), Institute of Archaeology Mongolian academy of Sciences, National museum of Mongolia
  28. Grach, A.D, "Novyye dannyye o drevney istorii Tuvy", UZTNIIYALI, 15, pp.93~107 (1971)
  29. Gryaznov, M.P, "Tsarskiy kurgan ranneskifskogo vremeni" (1980), Nauka
  30. Khavrin, S.V, "Metall epokhi Khunnu mogil’nika Terezin I (Tuva)", Arkheologicheskiye vesti, 22, pp.105~107 (2016)
  31. Kilunovskaya, M.E, "Iskusstvo kontsa pervogo Tysyacheletiya do n.e. v Tuve", KSIA, 247, pp.87~104 (2017)
  32. Kilunovskaya, M.E, "Ranniy zheleznyy vek Yevrazii ot rubezha er do serediny Ⅰ tys. n.e. Dinamika osvoyeniya kul’turnogo prostranstva", pp.72~75 (2017), Skifiya-print
  33. Kilunovskaya, M.E, "Novyye materialy ulug-khemskoy kul’tury v Tuve", Arkheologicheskiye vesti, 24, pp.125~152 (2018)
  34. Kyzlasov, L.R, "O pamyatnikakh rannikh gunnov", Drevnosti Vostochnoy Yevropy, 169, pp.115~124 (1969)
  35. Leus. P.M, "Xiongnu Archaeology Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the First Steppe Empire in Inner Asia", pp.515~536 (2011), Bonn
  36. Leus, P.M, "Terezin 1-mogil’nik epokhi Khunnu v Tsentral’noy Tuve", Arkheologicheskiye vesti, 22, pp.93~104 (2016)
  37. Matyushchenko, V. I, "Mogil’nik Sidorovka v Omskom Priirtysh’ye" (1997), Nauka
  38. Mannay-ool, M.H, "Tuva v skifskoye vremya (uyukskaya kul’tura)" (1970), Nauka
  39. Piotrovskiy, M.B, "Iz arkheologicheskikh kollektsiy Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha" (2013), Slavia
  40. Rybakova, B.A, "Stepnaya polosa aziatskoy chasti USSR v skifo-sarmatskoye vremya" (1992), Nauka
  41. Salmony, A, "Sino-siberian art in the collection of C.T.Loo" (1933), C. T. Loo
  42. Savinov, D.G, "Pogrebeniye s bronzovoy blyakhoy v Tsentral’noy Tuve", KSIA, 119, pp.104~108 (1969)
  43. Savinov, D.G, "Minusinskaya provintsiya khunnu" (2009), Elexis

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)