본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

匈奴係 鑣轡의 확산과 고대 동아시아의 기마 문화 수용

The Spreading of Xiongnu-Style Horse Bits and the Adoption of Horseback-riding Culture in Ancient East Asia

1

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In ancient East Asia in the period between the 3rd century B.C. and the 3rd century A.D., single-jointed iron bits, made by connecting two pieces of iron rods without twisting them, were introduced in the realm of the Xiongnu that consolidated the nomadic peoples of the Eurasian region. The most notable feature of these bits is the adoption of a new component, i.e., the use of a short connector joint that is attached to a rein. This can be construed as having been designed to enable a firmer grip on the reins when battling on horseback. It was intended to give more maneuverability to those on horseback, thus making it possible for them to achieve a higher level of horsemanship. On the other hand, the use of double-jointed bronze bits with three mouthpieces became widespread in the Central Plain areas of the Han Dynasty. This type can be interpreted as having been designed to enhance the controllability of a horse by adding a protruding bump in the middle of a bit to make a stronger stimulation on the tongue of the horse. This type has diverse shapes and decorative patterns, emphasizing its ornamental aspect. This paper surveys the types, production techniques, and components of horse bits found in the ancient East Asian region in the period between the 3rd century B.C. and the 3rd century A.D. and finds that "Xiongnu-style horse bits" based on the tradition of the pastoral nomadic culture coexisted with "Han-style horse bits" influenced by the Central Plain culture of China, and that these two types of horse bits vary in their production techniques and components, and their geographical distribution. The use of horseback riding and horse bits by pastoral nomads predates the time of the Xiongnu, but its seems likely that the presence of the Xiongnu's nomadic empire, in which cultural and material exchange via trade and confrontation was regarded as a highly important asset for the operation of society, played a pivotal role in spreading their skills and techniques throughout the regions including Northeast Asia.

Abstract

In ancient East Asia in the period between the 3rd century B.C. and the 3rd century A.D., single-jointed iron bits, made by connecting two pieces of iron rods without twisting them, were introduced in the realm of the Xiongnu that consolidated the nomadic peoples of the Eurasian region. The most notable feature of these bits is the adoption of a new component, i.e., the use of a short connector joint that is attached to a rein. This can be construed as having been designed to enable a firmer grip on the reins when battling on horseback. It was intended to give more maneuverability to those on horseback, thus making it possible for them to achieve a higher level of horsemanship. On the other hand, the use of double-jointed bronze bits with three mouthpieces became widespread in the Central Plain areas of the Han Dynasty. This type can be interpreted as having been designed to enhance the controllability of a horse by adding a protruding bump in the middle of a bit to make a stronger stimulation on the tongue of the horse. This type has diverse shapes and decorative patterns, emphasizing its ornamental aspect. This paper surveys the types, production techniques, and components of horse bits found in the ancient East Asian region in the period between the 3rd century B.C. and the 3rd century A.D. and finds that "Xiongnu-style horse bits" based on the tradition of the pastoral nomadic culture coexisted with "Han-style horse bits" influenced by the Central Plain culture of China, and that these two types of horse bits vary in their production techniques and components, and their geographical distribution. The use of horseback riding and horse bits by pastoral nomads predates the time of the Xiongnu, but its seems likely that the presence of the Xiongnu's nomadic empire, in which cultural and material exchange via trade and confrontation was regarded as a highly important asset for the operation of society, played a pivotal role in spreading their skills and techniques throughout the regions including Northeast Asia.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 장은정, "몽골 흉노무덤 자료집성" (2008), 도서출판 성림
  2. 강봉원, "신라사 연구에 있어서 ‘기마민족 이론’의 재고: 등자 및 재갈을 중심으로", 중앙아시아연구, 15, pp.111~135 (2010), 중앙아시아학회
  3. 강인욱, "고고학으로 본 흉노의 발생과 분포", 문화재, (36), pp.105~156 (2003), 국립문화재연구소
  4. 김두철, "한국 고대 마구의 연구", 박사, pp.2000
  5. 김영진, "고구려유물편" (2002), 사회과학출판사
  6. 나란, "몽골 호드긴톨고이 흉노무덤 출토 고인골 자료 분석, In 몽골 호드긴톨고이 흉노무덤", pp.105~118 (2003), 국립중앙박물관
  7. 니콜라 디코스모, "오랑캐의 탄생" (2002), 황금가지
  8. 동북아역사재단, "하가점상층문화의 청동기" (2007)
  9. 박중균, "百濟 初期 小考 - 청주 봉명동유적 출토 를 중심으로 -", 선사와 고대, (23), pp.191~210 (2005), 한국고대학회
  10. 박양진, "족속 추정과 부여 및 선비 고고학자료의 비료 분석", 한국고고학보, 39, pp.27~52 (1998)
  11. 박양진, "중국 동북지방의 선비 무덤 연구", 백제연구, 37, pp.1~41 (2000)
  12. 박양진, "考古學에서 본 夫餘", 한국고대사연구, (37), pp.55~79 (2005), 한국고대사학회
  13. 潘玲, "중국내 한대 흉노와 선비의 고고유물 비교분석, 흉노와 그 동쪽의 이웃들", 국립중앙박물관․부경대학교 2012 국제학술대회, pp.172~198 (2012)
  14. 백련행, "석암리에서 나온 고조선 유물", 고고민속, 1965(4) (1965)
  15. 세르게이 S. 미냐예프, "차람 계곡의 흉노 귀족 고분군, In 동아시아 고대문화 속의흉노", pp.91~147 (2010)
  16. 孫璐, "中國 東北地域 先秦時代 車馬具의 登場과 變遷", 한국고고학보, (81), pp.5~38 (2011), 한국고고학회
  17. 송기호, "扶餘史 연구의 쟁점과 자료 해석", 한국고대사연구, (37), pp.15~54 (2005), 한국고대사학회
  18. 송의정, "신라출토 외래계 문물", 世界史硏究セソター年報, 5, pp.51~67 (2011), 專修大學社會至性開發硏究東アジアセンタ-
  19. 오영찬, "낙랑군 연구" (2006), 사계절
  20. 윤용진, "한국청동기문화연구", 한국고고학보, 10-11 (1981)
  21. 윤형원, "광활한 몽골초원과 흉노인의 생존 - 고고학 증거를 중심으로 -", 중앙아시아연구, 15, pp.29~54 (2010), 중앙아시아학회
  22. 윤형원, "몽골 호드긴톨고이 흉노무덤" (2003), 국립중앙박물관
  23. D. 에르데네바타르, "발가슨 탈(골모드-II) 흉노 귀족무덤 조사, 흉노와 그 동쪽의이웃들", 국립중앙박물관․부경대학교 2012 국제학술대회, pp.143~171 (2012)
  24. Gelegdorj Eregzen, "몽골 흉노 무덤 연구", 박사, pp.2009
  25. 에렉젠, "흉노 귀족계층 무덤의 연구", 중앙아시아연구, 15, pp.55~78 (2010), 중앙아시아학회
  26. 早直人(이사하야 나오토), "製作技術로 본 夫餘의 와 韓半島 南部의 初期", 영남고고학, (43), pp.5~32 (2007), 영남고고학회
  27. 이상률, "삼한시대의 표비에 대하여, In 석오 윤용진 교수 정년퇴임기념논총", pp.173~195 (1996)
  28. 이상율, "삼한시대 표비의 수용과 획기 –영남지역을 중심으로–", 한국상고사학보, 62(62), pp.85~106 (2008), 한국상고사학회
  29. 이창희, "영남지방으로의 철기문화 유입에 대한 재고-표비를 중심으로", 고고광장, pp.143~164 (2007)
  30. 장은정, "도르릭나르스 흉노무덤" (2009), 국립중앙박물관
  31. 吉林省文物考古硏究所, "楡樹 老河深" (2008), 文物出版社
  32. 吉林市博物館, "吉林帽兒山漢代木槨墓" (1988), 遼海文物學刊
  33. 梅原末治, "南朝鮮に於ける漢代の遺蹟", 大正十一年度古蹟調査報告, 2 (1925)
  34. 高濱秀, "中國北方系靑銅器" (2005), 竹林舍
  35. 單月英, "匈奴墓葬硏究", 考古學報, 1 (2009)
  36. 東京國立博物館, "東京國立博物館所藏 中國北方系靑銅器" (2005), 竹林舍
  37. 邵會秋, "先秦時期北方地區金屬馬銜硏究", 邊疆考古硏究, 3, pp.96~114 (2005)
  38. 烏恩岳斯圖, "論夏家店上層文化在東北銅文化中的重要地位", 석당논총, 38(38), pp.37~60 (2007), 석당학술원
  39. 劉永華, "中國古代車輿馬具" (2002), 上海辭書出版社
  40. 魏竪, "內蒙古中南部漢代墓葬" (1998), 中國大百科全書出版社
  41. 魏竪, "內蒙古地區鮮卑墓葬的發現與硏究" (2004), 科學出版社
  42. 林俊雄, "遊牧國家の誕生" (2009), 山川出版社
  43. 諫早直人, "東北アジアにおける騎馬文化の考古學的硏究" (2012), 雄山閣
  44. Alexei A.Tishkin, "Characteristic burials of the Xiongnu period at Ialoman-II in the Altai, In Xiongnu Archaeology Perspectives of the First Steppe Empire in Inner Asia", pp.539~558 (2011), Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology BCAA
  45. G. Eregzen, "Treasures of the Xiongnu" (2011), MAS, NMM
  46. P.B. Konovalov, "The Burial Vault of Xiongnu Prince at Sudaha(Il’movaia Pad’, Transbaikalia)" (2008), Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology BCAA
  47. С.С.МИНЯЕВ, "ДЫРЕСТУЙКИЙ МОГИПЬНИК(Dyrestui burial ground.-2nd ed.)" (2007), St. Petereburg States University

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)