한국에서 中央유라시아史 연구의 회고와 전망 - (사)중앙아시아학회 『中央아시아硏究』를 중심으로 -
The Retrospect and Prospect of Studies of Central Eurasian History in Korea- Focusing on Central Asian Studies by The Korean Association for Central Asian Studies -
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Established in October, 12, 1996, The Korean Association for Central Asian Studies published the first number of Central Asian Studies in 16, December the same year. For two decades, broad public attention to and highly qualified research achievements for central eurasian history and culture have been increased phenomenally. In addition, outstanding research achievements of ‘History of North Asia’ by precedent researchers after the middle of 20th century have still its academic value even to this day. The Korean Association for Central Asian Studies developed from Association for Central Asian Studies of Korea, which was established in 1993. It issued Newsletter of the Association for central Asian Studies of Korea from 1st issue to 5th issue. Research achievements through ‘Association for Central Asian Studies of Korea,’ show the main stream of regional studies on Central Asia, based on history, language, archaeology, art history, costume, musicology and so forth. Especially, focusing on field surveys and experience on site and collecting historical materials, fundamental studies has been carried out till now. Considering the situation that we could not help accepting the ‘The Chinese World Order’ in past, research achievements in this field can be regarded as remarkable progress. Nevertheless, some problems as below still remain. First, nowadays researchers are negligent in quoting research findings by precedent researchers. Furthermore, it is true that constructive and academic criticism are also not enough. Second, translation of basic historical materials and note for them are insufficient. The researchers with great affection for central eurasian history and culture have to try harder in this field. Third, the lack of translation of academic works is also a serious problem. Fourth, academic terminology varies scholar to scholar. Last, studies of a certain period and region are insufficient. The reason for above situation is, first of all, absolute lack of researchers and social indifference. Therefore, not only should awareness of the importance of studies in this field be raised but also researchers should give more efforts in order to understand its history and culture in objective and balanced way. Henceforth, centering the association, the systematic and long-term supports, such as discovering and supporting rising talents and providing relevant resources and study opportunity, are very important for the future.
Abstract
Established in October, 12, 1996, The Korean Association for Central Asian Studies published the first number of Central Asian Studies in 16, December the same year. For two decades, broad public attention to and highly qualified research achievements for central eurasian history and culture have been increased phenomenally. In addition, outstanding research achievements of ‘History of North Asia’ by precedent researchers after the middle of 20th century have still its academic value even to this day. The Korean Association for Central Asian Studies developed from Association for Central Asian Studies of Korea, which was established in 1993. It issued Newsletter of the Association for central Asian Studies of Korea from 1st issue to 5th issue. Research achievements through ‘Association for Central Asian Studies of Korea,’ show the main stream of regional studies on Central Asia, based on history, language, archaeology, art history, costume, musicology and so forth. Especially, focusing on field surveys and experience on site and collecting historical materials, fundamental studies has been carried out till now. Considering the situation that we could not help accepting the ‘The Chinese World Order’ in past, research achievements in this field can be regarded as remarkable progress. Nevertheless, some problems as below still remain. First, nowadays researchers are negligent in quoting research findings by precedent researchers. Furthermore, it is true that constructive and academic criticism are also not enough. Second, translation of basic historical materials and note for them are insufficient. The researchers with great affection for central eurasian history and culture have to try harder in this field. Third, the lack of translation of academic works is also a serious problem. Fourth, academic terminology varies scholar to scholar. Last, studies of a certain period and region are insufficient. The reason for above situation is, first of all, absolute lack of researchers and social indifference. Therefore, not only should awareness of the importance of studies in this field be raised but also researchers should give more efforts in order to understand its history and culture in objective and balanced way. Henceforth, centering the association, the systematic and long-term supports, such as discovering and supporting rising talents and providing relevant resources and study opportunity, are very important for the future.
참고문헌 (10)
- "中央아시아硏究會會報 제1∼5호", 中央아시아硏究會, 1993.8∼1995.11, ~ (1993)
- "中央아시아硏究 제1호~제20-1호", (사)중앙아시아학회, 1996.12∼2015.6, ~ (1996)
- 김장구, "역주 몽골 황금사" (2014), 동북아역사재단
- 동북아역사재단, "북방민족사 연구논저 목록" (2007), 동북아역사재단
- 동양사학회, "韓國東洋史硏究者論著總目錄: 1948∼1998" (1999), 경인문화사
- 김장구, "동몽골의 역사적 가치와 미래", 동북아역사재단
- 김장구, "한국에서 高麗-몽골(元) 關係史 인식과 北方民族史 연구", 동국사학, (59), pp.525~558 (2015), 동국역사문화연구소
- 김호동, "韓國 內陸아시아史 硏究의 어제와 오늘", 中央아시아硏究會會報, 1 (1993), 中央아시아硏究會
- 김호동, "변방사의 한계를 넘어 ― 근30년 한국 중앙아시아사 및 요ㆍ금ㆍ원사 연구의 발전 ―", 동양사학연구, (133), pp.183~205 (2015), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 이개석, "蒙古帝國ㆍ元史硏究의 展望과 課題", 東洋史學硏究, 50 (1995), 동양사학회
