본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

大元제국 시기 至順 원년(1330)의 정변 謀議와 그 정치적 영향

Revisiting the Failed Coup of 1330 and its Significance in the Late Yuan Court Politics

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this paper, I examined the political history of Mongol empire, centering on the political upheaval that occurred in the first year of Zhishun(1330). This event was recorded very briefly in Yuanshi(元史), so many scholars did not pay attention to this historical event. But, this conspiracy has an important meaning in that it was a case that reflects the politics of late Yuan(Mongol) empire formed after the civil war between two capitals(兩都內戰). Wenzong(文宗) and El-Temür(燕鐵木兒) suppressed conspiracy quickly and decisively, resulting in the further strengthening of El-Temür’s political influence. In other words, through the suppression of coup of the first year of Zhishun, El-Temür was to have stabilized power. Meanwhile, Huizong(惠宗) Toγon-Temür could only be crowned after El-Temür died. In the early days of his reign, Huizong could not control the excessive power of powerful vassal, so emperor could not establish his own position. In 1340, Huizong drove away powerful vassal Bayan(伯顏) and tried to establish emperor’s authority. As a part of this plan, Huizong completely overturned the evaluation of conspiracy occurred in the first year of Zhishun. Those who participated in the conspiracy were now recognized as loyalists rather than traitors. In the meantime, Huizong basically denied an era that began with the ascension of Wenzong and ended with the expulsion of Bayan.

Abstract

In this paper, I examined the political history of Mongol empire, centering on the political upheaval that occurred in the first year of Zhishun(1330). This event was recorded very briefly in Yuanshi(元史), so many scholars did not pay attention to this historical event. But, this conspiracy has an important meaning in that it was a case that reflects the politics of late Yuan(Mongol) empire formed after the civil war between two capitals(兩都內戰). Wenzong(文宗) and El-Temür(燕鐵木兒) suppressed conspiracy quickly and decisively, resulting in the further strengthening of El-Temür’s political influence. In other words, through the suppression of coup of the first year of Zhishun, El-Temür was to have stabilized power. Meanwhile, Huizong(惠宗) Toγon-Temür could only be crowned after El-Temür died. In the early days of his reign, Huizong could not control the excessive power of powerful vassal, so emperor could not establish his own position. In 1340, Huizong drove away powerful vassal Bayan(伯顏) and tried to establish emperor’s authority. As a part of this plan, Huizong completely overturned the evaluation of conspiracy occurred in the first year of Zhishun. Those who participated in the conspiracy were now recognized as loyalists rather than traitors. In the meantime, Huizong basically denied an era that began with the ascension of Wenzong and ended with the expulsion of Bayan.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 任崇岳, "庚申外史箋証" (1991), 中州古籍出版社
  2. "高麗史(국사편찬위원회 고려시대 史料 Database)"[URL]
  3. 王頲, "黃溍全集" (2008), 天津古籍出版社
  4. "明太祖實錄(국사편찬위원회 명실록ㆍ청실록)"[URL]
  5. 高榮盛, "秘書監志" (1992), 浙江古籍出版社
  6. "雁門集, 中國古典文學叢書本" (1982), 上海古籍出版社
  7. "元史. 中華書局 標點校勘本" (1976), 中華書局
  8. 王樹民, "廿二史箚記校證" (1984), 中華書局
  9. "朝鮮世宗實錄(국사편찬위원회 조선왕조실록)"[URL]
  10. "至正直記, 宋元筆記叢書本" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
  11. 金龍善, "高麗墓誌銘集成" (2012), 한림대학교 출판부
  12. 김장구, "역주 몽골 황금사" (2014), 동북아역사재단
  13. Чоймаа, Ш, "Хаадын үндсэн хураангуй Алтан товч" (2011), Болор Судар
  14. 喬志勇, "元史及民族與邊疆硏究集刊 23" (2011), 上海古籍出版社
  15. 邱江寧, "元代奎章閣學士院與元代文壇" (2013), 中國社會科學出版社
  16. 邱樹森, "妥懽貼睦爾傳" (1991), 吉林敎育出版社
  17. 權五重, "大靑島에 온 元의 流配人", 人文硏究, 20(1) (1998)
  18. 권용철, "大元제국 말기 權臣 바얀의 정치적 行蹟", 동양사학연구, (120), pp.223~260 (2012), 동양사학회
  19. 권용철, "大元帝國 末期 權臣 엘테무르의 쿠데타 -‘케식’ 출신으로서의 정치적 명분에 대하여", 史叢(사총), (80), pp.217~246 (2013), 역사연구소[DOI]
  20. 권용철, "大元帝國 末期 政局과 고려 충혜왕의 즉위, 복위, 폐위", 韓國史學報, (56), pp.65~107 (2014), 고려사학회
  21. 권용철, "17~18세기 전반 몽골문 史書의 大元帝國 역사 서술 ― 황제들의 生沒, 즉위 연도 및 계보에 대한 비교 분석을 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (128), pp.297~348 (2014), 동양사학회
  22. 權容徹, "元代 중ㆍ후기 權臣 정치 연구", 박사, 사학과, pp.2017
  23. 鈕希强, "元朝兩都之戰硏究", 碩士, pp.2010
  24. 藤島建樹, "元の明宗の生涯", 大谷史學, 12 (1970)
  25. 藤島建樹, "元の順帝とその時代", 大谷學報, 49(4) (1970)
  26. 傅光森, "元朝中葉中央權力結構與政治生態", 博士, pp.2008
  27. 蘇振申, "元政書經世大典之研究" (1984), 中國文化大學出版部
  28. 여치호, "元代 아스人(Asud)의 擡頭와 政治的 役割", 동양사학연구, (120), pp.181~222 (2012), 동양사학회
  29. 王石莊, "<元史>名詞術語漢蒙對照詞典 上冊" (2015), 內蒙古人民出版社
  30. 汪受寬, "諡法硏究" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
  31. 劉迎勝, "元史論叢 11" (2009), 天津古籍出版社
  32. 張金銑, "元兩都之戰及其社會影響", 安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 30(5) (2006)
  33. 장동익, "高麗時代 對外關係史 綜合年表" (2009), 동북아역사재단
  34. 조원, "元 후기 『經世大典』의 편찬과 六典體制", 동양사학연구, (141), pp.291~316 (2017), 동양사학회[DOI]
  35. 蔡晶晶, "元史及民族與邊疆硏究集刊 28" (2014), 上海古籍出版社
  36. 蔡晶晶, "元史及民族與邊疆硏究集刊 31" (2016), 上海古籍出版社
  37. 帖慧禎, "元代名宦諡號硏究", 碩士, pp.2013
  38. 村岡倫, "モンゴル国現存モンゴル帝国ㆍ元朝碑文の研究" (2013), 大阪国際大学
  39. 최윤정, "元代 兩都內戰(1328)과 동북지역 —요양행성과 동도제왕 세력의 향배 및 세력 浮沈을 중심으로", 동북아역사논총, (46), pp.119~149 (2014), 동북아역사재단
  40. 洪金富, "元朝怯薛輪値史料攷釋", 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所集刊, 74(2) (2003)
  41. Endicott, Elizabeth, "The Role of Poison in Mongolian History", Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, 21 (2014)
  42. Liu, Yingsheng, "Eurasian Influences on Yuan China" (2013), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)