潛邸시기 쿠빌라이의 漢地경영과 세력형성 -그의 漢化문제에 대한 재검토-
Khubilai’s management of the Han territory and formation of power during Pre-Qa'an Period: A Reexamination of his Sinicization
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the purpose, implementation process, and results of various policies that Khubilai carried out while ruling as governor of the Han territory, such as Han territory management, composition of government staff, analyzes the causes and factors involved in the conflict between Khubilai and Möngke toward the end of Möngke’s rule, and shows that, during his pre-Qa'an period, Khubilai did not incline toward Sinicization but rather always maintained a neutral, open, and practical attitude during his Han territory rule and the process of expanding his rule. After Möngke became Qa'an, Khubilai was appointed governor of the Han territory (漢地). He actively utilized the Han law (漢法) to promote efficient management of the Han territory for the purpose of building a military base in order to prepare for an expedition against the Southern Song Dynasty. In other words, the Han law was the most effective means that Khubilai adopted to obtain the human and material resources needed to carry out his war in the Han territory. Furthermore, efficient Han territory management through the implementation of the Han law was in line with Möngke's plan of subjugating the Southern Song Dynasty. During his pre-Khan period, Khubilai was not mesmerized by Confucianism or the Han culture, and he did not trust or promote Han scholars (漢人儒士) to important positions. He only selected people who had practical knowledge and talent that could help him with his political and military activities into his staff. Because he did not put racial or religious restrictions in the appointment of talented individuals, his staff included not only Han people but also various non-Han people (非漢人) as well. After Khubilai was appointed governor of the Han territory, he successfully carried out his Han territory management and conquest of Dali (大理), thus becoming popular among the Hans and the Mongol ruling class. Emboldened by these achievements, he sometimes exceeded his authority and indulged in unlawful activities. His actions caused Möngke to distrust him and, as a result, Möngke severely restricted Khubilai’s governorship, excluded him from the expedition against the Southern Song Dynasty, and brought about a drastic diminution of Khubilai’s power. Therefore, the conflict between the two brothers need to be understood not as a collision of political forces between those favoring settlement life (定住派) and those favoring nomadic life (遊牧派) but rather as a power struggle within the Mongol ruling class.
Abstract
This paper examines the purpose, implementation process, and results of various policies that Khubilai carried out while ruling as governor of the Han territory, such as Han territory management, composition of government staff, analyzes the causes and factors involved in the conflict between Khubilai and Möngke toward the end of Möngke’s rule, and shows that, during his pre-Qa'an period, Khubilai did not incline toward Sinicization but rather always maintained a neutral, open, and practical attitude during his Han territory rule and the process of expanding his rule. After Möngke became Qa'an, Khubilai was appointed governor of the Han territory (漢地). He actively utilized the Han law (漢法) to promote efficient management of the Han territory for the purpose of building a military base in order to prepare for an expedition against the Southern Song Dynasty. In other words, the Han law was the most effective means that Khubilai adopted to obtain the human and material resources needed to carry out his war in the Han territory. Furthermore, efficient Han territory management through the implementation of the Han law was in line with Möngke's plan of subjugating the Southern Song Dynasty. During his pre-Khan period, Khubilai was not mesmerized by Confucianism or the Han culture, and he did not trust or promote Han scholars (漢人儒士) to important positions. He only selected people who had practical knowledge and talent that could help him with his political and military activities into his staff. Because he did not put racial or religious restrictions in the appointment of talented individuals, his staff included not only Han people but also various non-Han people (非漢人) as well. After Khubilai was appointed governor of the Han territory, he successfully carried out his Han territory management and conquest of Dali (大理), thus becoming popular among the Hans and the Mongol ruling class. Emboldened by these achievements, he sometimes exceeded his authority and indulged in unlawful activities. His actions caused Möngke to distrust him and, as a result, Möngke severely restricted Khubilai’s governorship, excluded him from the expedition against the Southern Song Dynasty, and brought about a drastic diminution of Khubilai’s power. Therefore, the conflict between the two brothers need to be understood not as a collision of political forces between those favoring settlement life (定住派) and those favoring nomadic life (遊牧派) but rather as a power struggle within the Mongol ruling class.
참고문헌 (35)
- "經世大典․書錄" (2002), 山東人民出版社
- 鄭麟趾, "高麗史" (1975), 亞細亞文化社
- 歐陽玄, "圭齊文集(四庫全書本)"
- 郝經, "陵川集(四庫全書本)"
- 姚燧, "牧庵集(四庫全書本)"
- 趙孟頫, "松雪齋集" (1991), 中華書店
- "元史(標點校勘本)" (1976), 中華書局
- 蘇天爵, "元朝名臣事略" (1996), 中華書局
- 王惲, "秋澗集(四庫全書本)"
- 김호동, "마르코폴로의 동방견문록" (2000), 사계절
- 라시드 앗 딘, "칸의 후예들" (2005), 사계절
- 김호동, "몽골제국과 고려" (2007), 서울대학교 출판부
- 모리스 로사비, "쿠빌라이 칸-그의 삶과 시대" (2008), 천지인
- 蕭啓慶, "元代史新探" (1983), 新文豊出版公司
- 李治安, "忽必烈傳" (2004), 人民出版社
- 周良霄, "忽必烈" (1986), 吉林敎育出版社
- 周良霄, "元代史" (1993), 人民出版社
- 陳得芝, "中國通史(第8卷 古代時代 元時期(上))" (1999), 上海人民出版社
- 韓儒林, "元朝史 上․下" (1986), 人民出版社
- 杉山正明, "モンゴル帝國と大元ウルス" (2004), 京都大學學術出版會
- Morgan, David, "The Mongols" (1986), Blackwell
- Allsen, Thomas T, "Commodity and Exchange in the Mongol Empire:A cultural history of Islamic textiles" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Allsen, Thomas T, "Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- 김호동, "蒙古帝國의 形成과 展開, In 강좌중국사 3" (1989), 지식산업사
- 김호동, "몽골제국과 ‘大元’", 역사학보, (192), pp.221~253 (2006), 역사학회
- 蕭啓慶, "忽必烈“潛邸舊侶”考", 大陸雜誌, 25(1) (1962)
- 姚從吾, "忽必烈汗與蒙哥汗治理漢地的岐見", 國立臺灣大學文史哲學報, 16
- 周淸澍, "忽必烈潛藩新政的成效及其歷史意義, In 內陸亞洲歷史文化硏究-韓儒林先生紀念文集" (1996), 南京大學出版社
- 趙文坦, "忽必烈早期與漢族士人關係考察", 山東大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 4 (1997)
- 陳得芝, "忽必烈與蒙哥的一場鬪爭-試論阿蘭答兒鈎考的前因後果", 元史論叢, 1 (1982)
- 愛宕松男, "フビライ=カーンとその時代", 歷史敎育, 11(9) (1963)
- 堤一昭, "クビライ政權の成立とスベェテイ家", 東洋史硏究, 48(1) (1989)
- 八田眞弓, "元の世祖と漢人知識人層", 史窓, 36 (1979)
- Franke,Herbert, "Could The Mongol Emperors Read And Write Chinese", Asia Major, 3(1) (1952)
- Langlois, John D, "Introduction In China under Mongol Rule" (1981), Princeton University Press
