조선 후기 『擇里志』의 읽기 방식 - 서발문 및 관련 저작을 중심으로 -

Abstract

This thesis collected and considered prologues and relative writings of ≪Taengniji≫ that had studied insufficiently in comparison with main body of ≪Taengniji≫ so as to examine intellectuals' recognition toward ≪Taengniji≫ in the late Joseon Dynasty. This thesis confirmed ≪Taengniji≫ readers understood in various ways by belonging groups through the process. By classifying and suggesting prologues and relative writings into three groups by contents and belonging groups of writers, various aspects of the recognition of ≪Taengniji≫ in the late Joseon Dynasty were shown. First is prologues of Yi Chung-hwan(李重煥)'s relatives. Their prologues have differences of the contents respectively, but guess worries and writing intention of Yi Chung-hwan commonly and empathize directly and indirectly. It should be caused by not only genre characteristics of prologues written to examine writer's subject consciousness but also writers' belonging groups. Yi Chung-hwan's relatives are emotionally more closed to Yi Chung-hwan than other groups as well as have similar political standpoint, so experienced problems of party strife in the same period. Therefore, they should have more excellent abilities in understanding and empathizing Yi Chung-hwan's subject consciusness than other groups. Second is <Hyanggeosoji> and <Maxim for children after reading Taengniji(觀擇里志書示兒輩)> of Hong Chung-in(洪重寅) and Hong Gui-beom(洪龜範). They are Namin people in the period same as Yi Chung-hwan and there is no relationship with Yi Chung-hwan. Two texts start from same sense of problem, worries about the damages of party strife, like ≪Taengniji≫. The solution suggested in here is different from that of ≪Taengniji≫. They criticized that living way to move party strife suggested by Yi Chung-hwan in ≪Taengniji≫ into the places without party strife or noblemen is self-contradiction and suggested to live simply and pastorally after avoiding resentment in hometown. Third is writings of Silhak(實學, practical science) scholars from the late 18th century to the early 19th century. While entering the full-scale period of Silhak, the understanding of ≪Taengniji≫ showed new aspects. Cheong Yag-Yong(丁若鏞) and Yi gyu-gyoung(李圭景) remained a writing about it and they were indifferent to 'meaning out of the letters' implied by Yi Chung-hwan, subject consciousness about damages of party strife and the worries as noblemen, unlike the pervious period. Instead of it, they concentrated on the information of ≪Taengniji≫ as it was and tried to expand it as their own knowledge briefly. They recognized ≪Taengniji≫ as geographical information or economic practical book. The above consideration had a few specimen, so it's somewhat difficult to show changing process of the awareness about ≪Taengniji≫ in the late Joseon Dynasty clearly. But, it shows various aspects of understanding ≪Taengniji≫ of Yi Chung-hwan's several readers from the period to the early 19th century. ≪Taengniji≫'s more relative writings should be discovered so as to draw changing process of the awareness about ≪Taengniji≫ more clearly.