대학생의 과학적 창의성 수준에 따른 인지통제의 차이
Cognitive Control Function of Individuals with Different Scientific Creativity
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 인지통제가 창의성의 영역별로 다를 것이라는 가정 하에 과학적 창의성의 인지통제 메카니즘을 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 285명의 중국 대학생을 대상으로 과학적 창의성 검사를 통해 창의성이 높은 대학생들(20명)과 낮은 대학생들(20명)을 구분하고, 이들 간의 인지통제기능의 차이를 비교하였다. 인지통제기능은 전통적으로 많이 사용되는 Stroop 과제를 사용하여 측정하였다. 연구 결과, 첫째, Stroop 과제 중 불일치자극 조건에서 과학적 창의성이 높은 학생들이 그렇지 않은 학생들에 비해 반응의 정확도가 유의하게 더 높았다. 둘째, Stroop 효과의 차이를 비교한 결과, 반응 속도 면에서 두 집단 간에 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 과학적 창의성이 높은 학생들이 그렇지 않은 학생들에 비해 인지통제 수준이 높아 결과적으로 과학적인 창의적 생산성을 높이는 데 유리할 것임을 시사한다. 이후 본 연구의 제한점과 향후 연구를 위한 제언을 논하였다.
Abstract
This study investigates the cognitive control of scientific creativity, according to the assumption that cognitive control would be different for each creative domain. High and low creativity group (N=20, respectively) are distinguished through a scientific creativity test for Chines college students (N=285), and the differences in cognitive control function are compared between two groups. Cognitive control function is measured using the Stroop task, which is traditionally used widely, and the study subjects are students of A University, Hebei Province, China. As a result, first, under the inconsistent stimulus condition in the Stroop task, high scientific creativity group has significantly higher response accuracy than low creativity group. Second, in Stroop effect for reaction speed, there is a significant difference between the two groups. Based on these results, this study concludes that the individual with high scientific creativity has higher cognitive control. Afterwards, the significance of this study and suggestions for future research are discussed.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김형재, "유아의 주의력 수준에 따른 창의성의 차이", 한국지역사회생활과학회지, 22(3), pp.395~406 (2011), 한국지역사회생활과학회
- 남기춘, "영재 아동들의 인지 및 정서적 억제처리 과정 : 스트룹 효과 및 정서 스트룹 효과 중심으로", 영재교육연구, 25(4), pp.469~491 (2015), 한국영재학회
- 박새롬, "시각과제와 청각과제를 통해 본 학령중기 아동의 인지통제기제 : 인지신경학적 연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 유주형, "청소년기 창의성에 미치는 주의의 영향: 유연한 인지통제, 경계주의, 정향주의를 중심으로", 인간발달연구, 25(3), pp.91~114 (2018), 한국인간발달학회[DOI]
- 임성만, "영역 특수적인 입장에서의 과학적 창의성에 대한 정의, 구성요인에 대한 탐색", 과학교육연구지, 33(1), pp.31~43 (2009), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 조수현, "창의성에 대한 인지신경과학 연구 개관", 인지과학, 26(4), pp.393~433 (2015), 한국인지과학회[DOI]
- 姚海娟, "创造性思维与认知抑制的关系", 心理科学, 37(2), pp.316~321 (2014)
- 姚海娟, "认知抑制对科学创造力和艺术创造力的影响", 心理发展与教育, 3, pp.353~362 (2015)
- Bai, X. J., "The inhibitory mechanism of individuals with different scientific creativity", Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 12(2), pp.151~155 (2014)
- Chiew, K, S., "Positive affect versus reward : emotional and Motivational influences on cognitive control", Frontiers in Psychology, 279 (2011)
- Cheng, L. F., "Cognitive inhibition and artistic creativity : The moderating effect of cognitive style", Psychological Development and Education, 31(3), pp.287~295 (2015)
- Devito, E. E., "A preliminary study of the neural effects of behavioral therapy for substance use disorders", Drug &Alcohol Dependence, 122(3), pp.228~235 (2012)
- Edl, S., "Creativity and the Stroop interference effect", Personality and Individual Differences, 69, pp.38~42 (2014)
- Eriksen, B., "Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task", Perception & Psychophysics, 16, pp.143~149 (1974)
- Eysenck, H. J, "Creativity and personality : suggestion for a theory", Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), pp.147~178 (1993)
- Fink, A., "The Creative Brain : Investigation of Brain Activity during Creative Problem Solving by means of EEG and fMＲI", Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), pp.734~748 (2009)
- Fumham, A., "Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity", Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), pp.1060~1069 (2008)
- Green, M. J., "Schizotypy and creativity as effects of reduced cognitive inhibition", Personality &Individual Differences, 27(2), pp.263~276 (1999)
- Groborz, M., "Creativity and cognitive control : Explorations of generation and evaluation skills", Creativity Research Journal, 15, pp.183~197 (2003)
- Hu, W., "A scientific creativity test for secondary school students", International Journal of Science Educarion, 24, pp.389~403 (2002)
- Hubner, R., "Response execution, selection, or activation:What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?", Psychological Research, 2006, pp.70, 245~261
- Lansbergen, M. M., "Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation", Clinical Neurophysiology Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(10), pp.2247~2254 (2008)
- Martindale, C., "Creativity and Cortical Activation during Creative", Intellectual and EEG Feedback Tasks．Biological Psychology, 3(2), pp.71~80 (1975)[DOI]
- Mitchell, R., "The psychological, neurochemical and functional neuroanatomical mediators of the effects of positive and negative mood on executive functions", Neuropsychologia, 45(4), pp.617~629 (2007)
- Miyake, A., "The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe”tasks: A latent variable analysis", Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), pp.49~100 (2000)
- Monsell, S., "Task switching", Trends in Cogritive Sciences, 7, pp.134~140 (2003)
- Pennington, B. F, "Executive functions and developmental Psychology", Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(1), pp.51~87 (1996)
- Radel, R., "The role of(dis)inhibition in creativity : decreased inhibition improves idea generation", Cognition, 13, pp.110~120 (2015)
- Simon, J. R., "The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing", Advances in Psychology, 65, pp.31~86 (1990)
- Simonton, D. K., "Creativity in science : Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Stroop, J. R., "Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions", Experimental Psychology, 18, pp.643~662 (1935)
- West, R., "Effect of increased response dominance and contextual disintegration on the stroop interference effect in older adults", Psychology and Aging, 13(2), pp.206~217 (1998)
- Xinru Z., "Adolescents with different profiles of scientific versus artistic creativity : Similarity and difference in cognitive control", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37 (2020)
- Zabelina, D. L., "Creativity as flexible cognitive control", Pxychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, pp.136~143 (2010)