본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

창의적 인지 평정척도 개발 및 타당화

Development and Validation of the Creative Cognition Rating Scale

박중규|강효신|김초복|허주연
대한사고개발학회 (The Korean Association For Thinking Development)|2024.04|사고개발 (Korean Journal of Thinking Development)|제20권 제1호|pp. 127-148|DOI https://doi.org/10.51636/JOTD.2024.04.20.1.127

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Creativity창의성타당화Validation창의적 인지인지 통제평정척도 개발Creative CognitionCognitive ControlDevelopment of Rating Scale

초록

본 연구에서는 창의성에 핵심적인 인지기능의 구성요소를 밝히고, 이를 측정하는 자기보고식 척도인 창의적 인지 평정척도(Creative Cognition Rating Scale, CCRS)를 개발 및 타당화하고자 하였다. 먼저 연구 1에서는 창의적 인지에 관한 문헌 검토를 통해 주요 요인을 추출한 후, 창의성과 인지 통제의 관계를 반영한 예비문항을 개발하였다. CCRS의 요인구조를 확인하기 위해 탐색적 요인분석을 수행한 결과, ‘탐색/인출’ 9문항, ‘전환/결합’ 5문항을 포함하는 2요인 구조가 적절한 것으로 나타났다. 2요인 구조의 타당성은 독립적인 표본을 사용한 확인적 요인분석을 통해 재검증하였다. 연구 2에서는 자기보고식 척도와 행동과제를 사용하여 CCRS의 준거 타당도를 검증하고자 하였다. 자기보고식 척도 간 상관분석을 수행한 결과, CCRS는 창의적 아이디어 생성 능력, 창의적 성격, 창의적 성취의도와 유의한 상관을 보였으며, 인지 통제 척도와 높은 관련성을 나타냈다. 또한, 창의성 행동과제인 대안 용도 과제의 수행과 관련성을 분석한 결과, CCRS의 두 하위요인이 각각 창의성의 다른 측면과 관련 있는 것을 확인하여 본 연구를 통해 개발한 척도가 창의성의 인지적 요인을 설명할 수 있는 유용한 도구임을 확인하였다. 마지막으로 CCRS의 의의와 본 연구의 한계, 후속 연구에 대해 논의하였다.

Abstract

This study was conducted to identify core cognitive factors of creativity and to develop the Creative Cognition Rating Scale (CCRS). In Study 1, core factors of creativity were extracted by reviewing previous review articles dealing with creative cognition, and items based on the factors were developed by reflecting the relationship between creativity and cognitive control. The result of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the two-factor structure with 9 items for 'Exploration/Retrieval' and 5 items for 'Switching/Combination' was valid for the scale. The subsequent confirmatory factor analysis reconfirmed the two-factor structure of the CCRS. In Study 2, the validity of CCRS was verified using self-report scales and behavioral tasks. As a result of correlation analysis between self-report scales, CCRS showed a significant positive correlation with the ability of creative idea generation, creative personality, and creative achievement intention. Also, CCRS was highly related to cognitive control scales. In addition, the analysis using the Alternative Uses Tasks, the behavioral tasks of creativity, showed that each factor of CCRS was related to creativity scores in different ways. These results suggested that the new scale would be an effective and valid tool for evaluating different cognitive components of creativity. Finally, the implications and limitations of this study were discussed.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. 김영채, "창의적 행동에 대한 상호작용 주의적 접근 : 체제적이고 변증법적인 창의의 과정", 사고개발, 11(3), pp.1~30 (2015)
  2. 김택호, "창의적 인성검사의 타당화 연구", 상담학연구, 10(1), pp.175~186 (2009)
  3. 박경빈, "한국어판 창의적 아이디어내기 척도(RIBS)타당화", 영재교육연구, 29(4), pp.559~573 (2019)
  4. 박연이, "초등학생용 한국판 창의적 인지과정 척도 타당화", 초등교육연구, 30(1), pp.97~119 (2017)
  5. 이가형, "창의적 성취의도 검사 개발 및 타당화", Global Creative Leader : Education & Learning, 10(2), pp.47~66 (2020)
  6. 전경원, "창의력 측정. 창의력 측정: 행복한 생존을 위한 창의력", pp.22~30 (2010), 창지사
  7. 허주연, "핵심 집행기능 평정척도 개발및 타당화 : 인지 모델을 기반으로", 사고개발, 19(2), pp.27~45 (2023)
  8. 홍지윤, "창의적 사고와 집행기능의 관계에 대한 메타분석 : 집행기능 유형과 자극 양식의 효과", 한국심리학회지 : 인지 및 생물, 34(3), pp.149~161 (2022)
  9. Chermahini, S. A., "Development and validity of a Dutch version of the Remote Associates Task : An item-response theory approach", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), pp.177~186 (2012)
  10. Beaty, R. E., "Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity?", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), pp.287~292 (2014)
  11. Beaty, R. E., "Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), pp.309~319 (2012)
  12. Benedek, M., "Toward a neurocognitive framework of creative cognition : The role of memory, attention, and cognitive control", Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, pp.116~122 (2019)
  13. Benedek, M., "The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought: Mind-wandering, creativity, dreaming, and clinical conditions" (2018), Oxford University Press
  14. Benedek, M., "The Cambridge handbook of creativity", pp.200~223 (2019), Cambridge University Press
  15. Chermahini, S. A., "Development and validity of a Dutch version of the Remote Associates Task : An item-response theory approach", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), pp.177~186 (2012)
  16. Chrysikou, E. G., "Creativity in and out of(cognitive)control", Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, pp.94~99 (2019)
  17. Finke, R. A., "Creative cognition:Theory, research, and applications" (1992), MIT Press
  18. Forthmann, B., "The be-creative effect in divergent thinking : The interplay of instruction and object frequency", Intelligence, 57, pp.25~32 (2016)
  19. George, T., "Fixation, flexibility, and forgetting during alternate uses tasks", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), pp.305~313 (2019)
  20. Gilhooly, K. J., "Divergent thinking : Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects", British Journal of Psychology, 98(4), pp.611~625 (2007)
  21. Guilford, J. P., "Intelligence, Creativity and their Educational Implications" (1968), Knapp
  22. Hass, R. W., "Semantic search during divergent thinking", Cognition, 166, pp.344~357 (2017)
  23. Hennessey, B. A., "Creativity", Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), pp.569~598 (2010)
  24. Heo, J., "The role of the prefrontal cortex in semantic control for selecting weakly associated meanings in creative idea generation", Neuroscience Letters, 802, pp.137177~ (2023)
  25. Hu, L. T., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation modeling : A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), pp.1~55 (1999)
  26. Kim, K. H., "Can we trust creativity tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking(TTCT)", Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), pp.3~14 (2006)
  27. Kleinmintz, O. M., "The two-fold model of creativity : The neural underpinnings of the generation and evaluation of creative ideas", Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, pp.131~138 (2019)
  28. Kozbelt, A., "The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity", pp.20~47 (2010), Cambridge University Press
  29. Kumar V. K., "The Creativity Styles Questionnaire--Revised", Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), pp.51~58 (1997)
  30. Lassig, C. J., "Approaches to creativity : How adolescents engage in the creative process", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, pp.3~12 (2013)
  31. Lee, C. S., "A measure of creativity or intelligence? Examining internal and external structure validity evidence of the Remote Associates Test", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), pp.446~460 (2014)
  32. Lee, C. S., "The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought : A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes", Intelligence, 41(5), pp.306~320 (2013)
  33. Lu, J. G., "“Switching On” creativity:Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, pp.63~75 (2017)
  34. Mednick, S., "The associative basis of the creative process", Psychological Review, 69(3), pp.220~232 (1962)
  35. Miller, A. L., "A Self-Report Measure of Cognitive Processes Associated with Creativity", Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), pp.203~218 (2014)
  36. Nusbaum, E. C., "Ready, set, create:What instructing people to “be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), pp.423~432 (2014)
  37. Palmiero, M., "Divergent thinking and the core executive functions : A stateof-the-art review", Cognitive Processing, 23, pp.341~366 (2022)
  38. Rhodes, M., "Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics", pp.216~222 (1987), Bearly
  39. Rogaten. K., "Development and validation of the short use of creative cognition scale in studying", Educational Psychology, 35(3), pp.294~314 (2015)
  40. Runco, M., "Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior", Creativity Research Journal, 13, pp.393~400 (2001)
  41. Runco, M. A., "Creativity", Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), pp.657~687 (2004)
  42. Satorra, A., "Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic", Psychometrika, 75(2), pp.243~248 (2010)
  43. Silvia, P. J., "Verbal fluency and creativity : General and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability(Gr)factors to divergent thinking", Intelligence, 41(5), pp.328~340 (2013)
  44. Silvia, P. J., "Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks : Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), pp.68~85 (2008)
  45. Smith, S., "Creativity and innovation in organizational teams", pp.3~20 (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  46. Ward, T. B., "Handbook of creativity" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  47. Ward, T. B., "The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity", pp.175~199 (2019), Cambridge University Press
  48. Weiss, S., "On the trail of creativity : Dimensionality of divergent thinking and its relation with cognitive abilities, personality, and insight", European Journal of Personality, 35(3), pp.291~314 (2020)
  49. Welling, H., "Four mental operations in creative cognition: The importance of abstraction", Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), pp.163~177 (2007)
  50. Yeh, Y-C., "Encyclopedia of Creativity", pp.291~298 (2011), Elsvieer Academic Press
  51. Zabelina, D. L., "Unity and diversity of executive functions in creativity", Consciousness and Cognition, 68, pp.47~56 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

창의성의 인지과정 척도의 개발 및 타당화이명숙, 최병연한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2016 · 제16권 제4호창의적 메타인지 척도(CMCS)의 개발 및 타당화권유선, 안동근, 표정민한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2023 · 제23권 제1호창의적 자기신념 척도의 개발 및 타당화박은지, 최인수한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2020 · 제20권 제3호창의성과 인지적 유연성의 관계에 관한 개관: 세 가지 관점을 중심으로김초복, 허주연한국인지및생물심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물2022 · 제34권 제3호대학생 창의인재역량 검사의 개발 및 타당화권유선, 박숙희, 안혜진, 한윤영한국영재교육학회 · 영재와 영재교육2014 · 제13권 제3호창의적 문제발견 능력 측정을 위한언어, 수, 도형의 재구조화 연합검사 개발 및 타당화한윤영한국창의력교육학회 · 창의력교육연구2018 · 제18권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

노년의 지능과 창의력의 변화김영채pp. 1-22노화불안의 척도 개발 및 타당화김기옥, 조현철pp. 23-55메타인지, 학습판단 및 학습전략 사용정도가 중학교 과학 학업성취에 미치는 영향석보영, 박미정, 강이철, 이병직pp. 57-79개념도 분석을 통해 본 초등학생 학부모의 선행학습에 관한 인식한기순, 이혜준pp. 81-110고등학생 생활안전의식에 대한 잠재프로파일 분석김은미, 김은미pp. 111-126
원문 보기