본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Paper-Based Assessment vs. Computer-Based Assessment: Comparing Students’ Observed Stress Behaviors

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study examined the stress behaviors of seventh-grade students who took a paper-and-pencil-based assessment (PPA) or a computer-based assessment (CBA). The tests were administered before and after they had worked for three weeks on solving a video-based math anchor called Fraction of the Cost and a related hands-on problem called the Hovercraft Challenge. Using an adapted version of the Classroom Child Stress Behavior Instrument as a scoring guide, results showed that low-achieving students and high-achieving students displayed about the same amount of stress while taking the CBA whereas low-achieving students exhibited significantly more stress than high-achieving students on the PPA. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

Abstract

This study examined the stress behaviors of seventh-grade students who took a paper-and-pencil-based assessment (PPA) or a computer-based assessment (CBA). The tests were administered before and after they had worked for three weeks on solving a video-based math anchor called Fraction of the Cost and a related hands-on problem called the Hovercraft Challenge. Using an adapted version of the Classroom Child Stress Behavior Instrument as a scoring guide, results showed that low-achieving students and high-achieving students displayed about the same amount of stress while taking the CBA whereas low-achieving students exhibited significantly more stress than high-achieving students on the PPA. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Andersson, G, "Internet administration of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in a sample of tinnitus patients", Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, pp.259~262 (2003)
  2. Bender, W.N, "Learning disabilities: Characteristics, identification, and teaching strategies (4th ed.)" (2001), Allyn and Bacon
  3. Birenbaum, M, "On the relationship between test anxiety and test performance", Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 27, pp.293~302 (1994)
  4. Bottge, B.A, "A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes", Exceptional Children, 59, pp.556~566 (1993)
  5. Bottge, B. A, "Effects of video-based and applied problems on the procedural math skills of average- and low-achieving adolescents", Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(2), pp.5~22 (2003)
  6. Bottge, B. A, "Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes", The Journal of Special Education, 35(4), pp.186~200 (2002)
  7. Bottge, B.A, "Assessing and tracking students’ problem solving performances in anchored learning environments", Educational Technology Research & Development (2009)
  8. Bottge, B.A, "Integrating reform-oriented math instruction in special education settings", Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, pp.96~109 (2007)
  9. Bottge, B, "Situating math instruction in rich problem-solving contexts: Effects on adolescents with challenging behaviors", Behavioral Disorders, 31, pp.394~407 (2006)
  10. Brush, T, "Implementation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: a case study", Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(3) (2000)
  11. Burts, D.C, "Observed activities and stress behaviors of children in developmentally appropriate and inappropriate kindergarten classrooms", Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, pp.297~318 (1992)
  12. Calhoon, M.B, "Effects of computer-based test accommodations on mathematics performance assessments for secondary students with learning disabilities", Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 23(4), pp.271~282 (2000)
  13. Chandler, P, "Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction", Cognition and Instruction, 8, pp.293~332 (1991)
  14. Clariana, Roy B, "Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode effect", British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), pp.595~604 (2002)
  15. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, "The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development" (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  16. Dalton, S, "Nonrandom assignment in ANCOVA: The alternate ranks design", Journal of Experimental Education, 46, pp.58~62 (1977)
  17. DeAngelis, S, "Equivalency of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing", Journal of Allied Health, 29(3), pp.161~164 (2000)
  18. Everson, H.T, "Isolating gender differences in test anxiety: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Test Anxiety Inventory", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, pp.243~251 (1991)
  19. Computer-Based and Paper-Based Measurement of Recognition Performance, "Federico, P", Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, ~, pp.NPRDC-TR-89-7 (1989)
  20. Giordano, L.A, "Effects of test anxiety in control training on anxious behaviors and academic performance in college students with learning disabilities", Dissertation Abstract International, 60, pp.4196~ (2000)
  21. Guthrie, L. F, "Turned on to language arts: Computer literacy in the primary grades", Educational Leadership, 53(2), pp.14~17 (1995)
  22. Hancock, D.R, "Effects of test anxiety and evaluative threat on students achievement and motivation", The Journal of Educational Research, 94, pp.284~290 (2001)
  23. Hargreaves, M, "Computer or paper? That is the question: does the medium in which assessment questions are presented affect children's performance in mathematics?", Educational Research, 46(1), pp.29~42 (2004)
  24. Hembree,R, "Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety", Review of Educational Research, 58, pp.47~77 (1988)
  25. Hill, K. T, "Test anxiety: A major educational problem and what can be done about it", Elementary School Journal, 85, pp.105~126 (1984)
  26. International Society for Technology in Education, "Connecting curriculum and technology", International Society for Technology in Education (2000)
  27. Johnson, M, "On-line mathmatics assessment: the impact of mode on performance and question answering strategies", The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(5) (2006)
  28. Ko, C, "Flexible and secure computer-based assessment using a single zip disk", Computers & Education, 50(3) (2008)
  29. Lancaster, S, "Experiences of students with disabilities in selected community and technical colleges. The individual accommodation model: Accommodating students with disabilities in post-secondary setting" (2001), Center for Research on Learning, Kansas University
  30. Lepper, M, "Motivational considerations in the study of instruction", Cognition and Instruction, 5, pp.289~309 (1988)
  31. Lumsden, J.A, "A comparison study of the paper-and-pencil, personal computer, and Internet versions of Holland's Self-Directed-Search", Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, pp.85~94 (2004)
  32. Malone, T, "Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction", Cognitive Science, pp.333~369 (1981)
  33. Mason, B.J, "An examination of the equivalence between non-adaptive computer-based and traditional testing", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(1), pp.29~38 (2000)
  34. Comparability of computer and PP scores for two CLEP general examinations, "Mazzeo, J", College Entrance Examination Board, ~, pp.College Board Report 91-5 (1991)
  35. McGough, J, "A web-based testing system with dynamic question generation", 31st ASEE, 2001, 23~28
  36. Noyes, J. M, "Students’ attitudes toward books and computers", Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2), pp.233~241 (2005)
  37. Ozden, M. Y, "Students’ perceptions of online assessment: A case study", Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), pp.77~92 (2004)
  38. Pitrowski, C, "Are the reported barriers to internet-based instruction warranted?” A synthesis of recent research", Eductaion, 121, pp.48~53 (2000)
  39. Powers, D.E, "Test anxiety and test performance: comparing paper-based and computer-adaptive versions of the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) General Test", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, pp.249~273 (2001)
  40. Puntakbekar, S, "Designing navigation support in hypertext systems based on navigation patterns. Instructional Science", An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 33(5) (2005)
  41. Richardson, M, "Challenging Minds? Students’ perceptions of computer-based World Class Tests of problem-solving", Computers and Human Behavior, 18(6), pp.633~649 (2002)
  42. Ruban, L, "Patterns of self-regulation: Patterns of self-regulatory strategy use among low-achieving and high achieving university students", Roeper Review, 28(3) (2006)
  43. "Stress management for the learned disabled: ERIC Clearing House on Handicapped and Gifted Children"[URL]
  44. Field Test of a Computer-Based GRE General Test, "Schaeffer, Gary A", ~, pp.RR-93-07 (1993)
  45. Schacter, J, "The impact of educational technology on student achievement: what the most current research has to say" (1999), The Milken Family Foundation
  46. Stevens, S.A, "Test anxiety and beliefs about testing in college students with and without learning disabilities", Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(7) (2001)
  47. Sweller, J, "Cognitive load during problem solving : Effects on learning", Cognitive Science, 12, pp.257~285 (1988)
  48. Sweller, J, "Cognitive architecture and instructional design", Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), pp.251~296 (1998)
  49. VanZile-Tamsen, C, "The differential impact of motivation on the self-regulated strategy use of high- and low-achieving college students", Journal of College Student Development, 40, pp.54~60 (1999)
  50. Vygostky,L.S, "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  51. Wachelka, D, "Reducing test anxiety and improving academic self-esteem in high school and college students with learning disabilities", Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 30, pp.191~198 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)