본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

통합학급 교사의 교수적 수정의 수행 측정도구 개발을 위한 기초연구

An Exploratory Study on the Development of Measurement Tools: In Case of instructional adaptations by Integrated Class Teachers

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구는 통합학급 교사의 교수적 수정의 수행을 측정하는 도구를 개발하여 그에 따른 통합학급 교사의 실제 수행정도를 규명해 보고자 하였다. 전국의 345명의 통합학급 교사를 대상으로 설문지를 보내 301부가 회수되었으며 결측값이 있는 14부의 설문지를 제외하고 287부의 설문지가 최종 분석되었다. 수집된 자료는 통합학급 교사의 교수적 수정의 수행 측정도구의 양호도, 신뢰도, 타당도를 검증하기 위해 SPSSWIN(Version 15.0) 프로그램과 AMOS(Version 7.0) 프로그램을 사용하여 처리하였다. 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 고유치가 1이상인 요인이 5개(교수-학습 과정, 평가 방법, 교수 내용, 교수 방법, 교수 환경), 29개 문항으로 나타났고, χ², GFI, AGFI, RMR, RMSEA, TLI 등의 적합도 평가 지수를 통해 확인적 요인분석 실시하였는데 유의미한 결과가 나와 수행 하위요인들의 설정이 잘 되었음을 나타내고 있다. 요인분석을 통해 검증된 교수적 수정 수행의 신뢰도는 .94로 나와 일관성 있는 신뢰할 만한 도구라는 결론에 도달하였다.

Abstract

The study aims at developing the measurement tool for integrated class teachers' instructional adaptations and thus examining the performance capabilities of the teachers. In order to achieve the research objectives, the author raises the research problems as follows. First, how are the question items in the measurement tools for instructional adaptations organized?Second, how are the validity and reliability of the measurement tools for instructional adaptations?Third, what features does the performance of instructional adaptations have according the application of the measurement tools developed?The author undertook a literature review and investigated the previous studies and developed the measurement tool consisting of 37 questions in order to deal with the research problem 1. The measurement tool was ultimately completed with 32 measurement questions, which were filtered and revised among the initial 37 questions while applying the validity tests by a group of experts in the field. The validity of the measurement tool was verified by conducting a preliminary survey for 30 integrated class teachers, and the clarity as well as ease of use in reading and responding were tested, which led to the modification of some of the questions, and finally yielded 32 questions. In case of dealing with the research problem 2, the author sent the questionnaires to 345 integrated class teachers nationwide in Korea, and returned 301 responses from the teachers. Among the 301 responses returned, 14 responses with missing data or missing value were excluded, and thus 287 responses were finally analyzed. The data collected through the questionnaire survey was statistically processed by using SPSSWIN Version 15.0 and AMOS Version 7.0 application packages in order to test for the goodness, reliability, and validity of the measurement tool for assessing the integrated class teachers' performance capabilities. The goodness of question items was examined by calculating the mean and standard deviation values, the item discrimination was assessed by the independent sample t-test with the 25th and 75th, and the item difficulty was investigated by calculating the percentage of performance capabilities factors. The reliability test for the measurement tool developed was made possible by calculating the Cronbach's coefficient alpha value, which assessed the degree of inter-item consistency, and the Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient was yielded to examine the relation among the component factors. In addition, both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were undertaken in order to extract the component factors of the measurement tool for instructional adaptations performance capabilities and test the construct validity respectively. The exploratory factor analysis revealed that the eigenvalues of 5 factors such as teaching-learning process, assessment method, teaching content, teaching method, and teaching environment in 29 items were estimated to be greater than 1, and confirmatory factor analysis using the fit indices such as χ², GFI, AGFI, RMR, RMSEA, and TLI yielded statistically significant results, which explained that the subcategories for performance capabilities were well defined. And in case of the item difficulty, the percentage values for items were shown to be distributed in an appropriate way, and in case of the item discrimination, the estimation showed that the items were constructed in a way that effectively discriminates between the upper and lower groups. According to the factor analysis, the reliability of instructional adaptations performance capabilities was found to be consistent, so that the author was able to conclude that the measurement tool was reliable, with the reliability coefficient of 0.94. In case of the research problem 3, the author conducted the t-test and F-test as well as applied the measurement tool in practice, which led to the examination of the features of performance capabilities. Female teachers were found to have a higher mean value in such factors as assessment method, teaching method, and teaching environment, but there was no significant difference in teacher's career history. The integrated class career history had a higher mean value for those teachers with more than three years of teaching experiences in such factors as teaching-learning process, teaching content, and teaching method. In case of the factors such as special education training experience and special education grade year, there was not found any significant difference among groups. The differences in performance capabilities of disabled students by the type of disability were significant among the special education teachers for students with visual or hearing impairments, and the teachers who have a disabled child nearby had a higher mean value relative to those teachers having a disabled child nearby, but the performance capabilities by the degree of disability were not estimated to be significantly different.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 강병선, "한글 SPSS 12K 사회과학 통계 분석" (2006), SPSS 아카데미
  2. 경민주, "장애아동이 통합된 일반학급 교사들의 교사효능감과 교수적 수정에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.2008
  3. 권요한, "특수아동을 위한 교육과정과 수업" (2003), 도서출판 특수교육
  4. 권요한, "통합 교욱에서의 교육과정 조정 요인", 특수교육학연구, 37(2), pp.249~278 (2002), 한국특수교육학회
  5. 김주혜, "초등학교 통합학급교사의 장애학생에 대한 교수수행 평가도구 개발 기초연구", 특수교육, 8(1), pp.5~23 (2009), 특수교육연구소
  6. 박승희, "일반학급에 통합된 장애학생의 수업의 질 향상을 위한 교수적 수정", 특수교육연구, 34(2), pp.29~71 (1999)
  7. 백진희, "초등학교 통합학급에서의 교수적 수정에 대한 특수교사와 일반교사의 인식", 석사, pp.2006
  8. 이말연, "교육과정 조정에 대한 통합학급 교사의 인식도와 실천도 분석", 석사, pp.2002
  9. 이영학, "초등통합학급 내에서 장애아동을 위한 교사들의 교수적 조정 실태 조사 연구", 한국교원교육연구, 20(1), pp.245~268 (2003), 한국교원교육학회
  10. 이정미, "효율적인 통합교육을 위한 통합학급 교사의 지원 요구에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2009
  11. 정영미, "초등학교 통합학급에서의 교수적 수정에 대한 일반교사의 인식", 석사, pp.2008
  12. 최성규, "초등학교 교사의 통합교육에 대한 태도와 수행간의 상관관계 연구", 특수교육재활과학연구, 42(2), pp.73~91 (2003)
  13. 최성규, "통합교육에 대한 교사 태도 검사 도구의 개발과 적용 가능성", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 8(4), pp.217~240 (2007), 한국특수교육문제연구소
  14. Cohen, R. L, "Individual differences in short-term memory", International review of mental retardation, 11, pp.43~77 (1982)
  15. Freeman, M. A., "Competencies for professionals in LD : An analysis of teather perceptions", Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(1) (1979)
  16. Holahan, A. T., "Elementary school science for students with disabilities", Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), pp.86~93 (1994)
  17. McLeskey, J., "Inclusion: Where is it happening", Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(1), pp.4~10 (1998)
  18. Salisbury, C. L., "Promoting the instructional inclusion of young children with disabilities in the primary grades", Journal of Early Invention, 18(3), pp.311~322 (1994)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)