判決前調査制度의 合理的 改善方案에 관한 硏究- 司法制度改革推進委員會 ‘量刑調査制度 導入 法案’을 중심으로 -
A Study on Rational Presentence Investigation System
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
As many other countries, We have ‘presentence investigation system’ in Korean criminal justice system. But, in comparison with other country’s system like America or England, our system is imperfect. That is to say, our presentence investigation system is legally applied only to juvenile criminals. In addition, though Korean probation and parole office have the power of presentence investigation, this power is not effectively used. So, legally, adult criminals have been sentenced in a court without presentence investigation process. And consequently, their mental disorder, home background, social environment, the cause of crime and so on are not precisely considered in a court. So, such sentencing have some problems that is unscientific, regimental, and none effective to criminal’s treatment and rehabilitation. Fortunately, Presidential Committee on Judicial Reform has made a law about presentence investigation, but this law also have many problems. That is to say, this law rules the subject of presentence investigation dualistically - court official and probation officer. Such system is not discovered in any other country, and this may cause chaos of presentence investigation process and may result in the squandering of national budget. So, this article indicate the importance of complete presentence investigation system and that we should made a law of presentence investigation system more systematically and unitarily.
참고문헌 (26)
- 국회법제사법위원회, "정책현안자료집" (2006)
- 김재봉, "양형조사제도 도입과 양형데이터베이스 구축", 사법제도개혁추진위원회 양형제도 개선을 위한 제1차 전문가 토론회 (2005)
- 판결전조사제도의 현황과 개선방안: 성인범에 대한 판결전조사제도를 중심으로, "김혜정", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 02-24 (2002)
- 김혜정, "양형제도의 개선에 관한 의견", 사법제도개혁추진위원회양형제도 개선을 위한 제2차 전문가 토론회 (2005)
- 법무부, "2005 판결전조사분석" (2005)
- 사법제도개혁추진위원회, "사법제도개혁추진위원회 제8차 회의결과요지" (2005)
- 사법제도개혁추진위원회 기획추진단, "양형제도의 개선방안(설명자료)", ~ (2005)
- 사법제도개혁추진위원회 기획추진단장, "양형제도의 개선방안(의결안건)", ~ (2005)
- "세계일보(3. 7.)", ~ (2006)
- 이법호, "판결전조사에 관한 연구", 법무연수원 제5기 일반관리자반 연수자료집, ~ (2003)
- 판결전조사제도에 관한 연구, "이상철", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 93-06 (1993)
- 이종철, "양형제도 개선 토론자료⑴", 사법제도개혁추진위원회 양형제도 개선을 위한 제1차 전문가 토론회 (2005)
- 정동기, "사회봉사명령제도의 연구", D, pp.1997
- 최석윤, "판결전조사제도(한국형사정책연구원 개원 10주년 및 보호관찰제도 시행 10주년 기념세미나 발표자료집: 보호관찰제도의 회고와 전망)", 한국형사정책연구원 개원 10주년 및 보호관찰제도 시행 10주년 기념세미나 발표자료집 (1999), 한국형사정책연구원
- 한영수, "양형자료조사제도의 도입과 양형데이터베이스 구축", 사법제도개혁추진위원회 양형제도 개선을 위한 제1차 전문가 토론회 (2005)
- 藤本哲也, "現代アメリカ犯罪學事典" (1991), 東京: 京草書房
- 日本法務省保護局, "諸外國の更生保護制度⑴", 保護資料, 27 (1997)
- Administrative Office of the United States Courts, "The Presentence Investigation Reports", Publication, (107) (1972)
- Allen, Harry E, "Probation and Parole in America" (1992), New York: The Free Press
- Champion, Dean J, "Probation, Parole and Community Corrections" (2002), Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc
- Delcker, Renschler, "Die Gerichtshilfe in der Praxis der Strafrechtspflege" (1983), Eigenverlag Max-Planck-Institut
- Fennel, Stephan A, "Due Process at Sentencing: An Empirical and Legal Analysis of the Disclosure of Presentence Reports in Federal Courts", Harvard Law Review, 93 (1999)
- Fox, Vernon B, "Introduction to Corrections, 4th ed." (1994), Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Career and Technology
- Howard, Abadinsky, "Probation and Patrol: Theory and Practice" (1994), Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
- Home Office, "National Standard for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community" (1995)
- Ward, Richard W, "Community Sentences: Law and Practice" (1993), London: Blackstone Press