본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교정기관 성폭력 심리치료프로그램 효과성 연구

A Study on the Effectiveness of Sexual Violence Psychotherapy Program in Correctional Institution

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

본 연구는 대구지방교정청 소재 P교도소에 수용중인 성폭력 이수명령 대상자 24명중 12명에 대하여 성폭력사범 심리치료프로그램 기본과정을 시행하고 12명은 무처치통제집단으로 배정하여 그 효과성을 조사하였다. 이를 위해 법무부에서 2022년 새롭게 개발한 성폭력사범 심리치료 프로그램 효과성 평가집(SOTEST)을 사전과 사후에실시하여 인지/태도, 자기관리문제, 대인관계, 성적 관심문제 영역에서 개입의 효과가있는지를 분석하였다. 연구 결과 실험 집단에 있어 심리치료 프로그램 후 유의한 효과가 나타났으며, 무처치 통제집단과 비교도 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 또한, 그 결과를 교차 검증하기 위해 타인 보고식 치료자 평가를 진행했으며 5가지 하위요인에 대한 수형자의 자기보고 평가와 치료자의 타인보고 평가가 일치하는 결과를 보였다. 성폭력사범 대상 심리치료 프로그램 후 강간통념, 변화동기 등에는 변화를 나타냈으나, 대인관계, 자기관리, 성적인 집착 등에는 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 추후 연구에서 대인관계 등에서 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않은 원인을 탐색하고 성폭력사범대상 중 집중과정과 심화과정에서도 유사한 양상이 발견되는지 확인할 필요가 있다. 또한 연구에 참여한 참여자 표본 수의 한계가 있을 수 있으므로 더 많은 자료를통해 본 연구의 결과가 유지 또는 개선되는지 여부도 중요하다. 본 연구는 기존의 성폭력관련 척도가 아니라 교정시설에 수용된 성폭력사범을 대상으로 개발 및 타당화된척도를 통해 그 효과성을 검증하였다. 더불어 치료자의 타인보고 결과의 일치성을 확인하였다는 연구에 의의가 있다. 몇 가지 제한점을 극복하고 프로그램의 질적 향상을위해 이 도구의 적합성과 프로그램 내용의 구성에 대해서도 건강한 논의가 지속되어야 할 것이다.

Abstract

This study was conducted on 24 people who were subject to a sexual violence completion order housed in the P prison correctional institution located at the Daegu Regional Correctional Service. An experimental design was designed in which 12 people were subjected to a basic psychological treatment program for sexual violence offenders and 12 people were treated as a non-treatment control group. To determine effectiveness, Sexual Offender Treatment Effect Scale Toolkit (SOTEST), newly developed by the Ministry of Justice in 2022, was used. Evaluation scales were administered pre- and post-test to explore whether there were differences in the areas of cognition/attitude, self-management problems, interpersonal relationships, and sexual interest problems, and were also compared with the untreated control group. As a result, the effectiveness of the experimental group that participated in the sexual violence psychotherapy program was shown, and there was a statistically significant difference when compared to the untreated control group. In addition, in order to cross-verify the results, another-reported therapist evaluation was conducted, and the results showed that the inmate’s self-reported evaluation and the therapist’s other-reported evaluation of the five sub-factors were consistent. After the psychological treatment program for sexual assault offenders, there were changes in rape myths and motivation for change, but there were no significant differences in interpersonal relationships, self-management, and sexual obsession. In future research, it is necessary to explore the reasons why significant differences did not appear in interpersonal relationships and to check whether similar patterns are found in intensive/intensive courses for sexual assault offenders. Additionally, since the number of participant samples participating in the study may be limited, it is also important to determine whether the results of this study are maintained or improved with more data in the future. The significance of this study is that it verified the effectiveness through a scale developed and validated with sexual assault offenders housed in correctional facilities, rather than an existing sexual violence-related scale, and confirmed the consistency of the results reported by the therapist to others. In order to overcome some limitations and improve the quality of the program, healthy discussions should continue regarding the suitability of this tool and the composition of the program contents.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 김경아, "출소자의 심리특성이 지역사회적응에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2019
  2. 2021 범죄분석, "대검찰청", ~ (2022)
  3. 송원영, "성폭력 범죄로 보호관찰중인 청소년에 대한 인지행동치료의 효과", 박사, 심리학, pp.2007
  4. 송원영, "청소년 성폭력범죄자를 위한 인지행동치료의 개발 및 단기 효과 검증", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(2), pp.549~571 (2008), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
  5. 송원영, "청소년 성범죄자를 위한 인지행동치료의 장기 효과 검증: 7년 추적연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32(3), pp.667~682 (2013), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
  6. 박성훈, "형사정책과 사법제도에 관한 평가 연구(Ⅷ)", pp.1~570 (2014), 형사정책연구원
  7. 이선영, "아동성폭력범의 정서인식능력에 관한 연구", 석사, 범죄심리학과, pp.2013
  8. 성폭력사범 심리치료 프로그램 효과성 평가 척도 개발 및 타당화, "법무부", 건양대학교 산학협력단, ~ (2022)
  9. 이영아, "성범죄자 치료프로그램의 개선방안에 대한 연구", 교정복지연구, (48), pp.127~147 (2017), 한국교정복지학회[DOI]
  10. 윤정숙, "성범죄자 재범방지를 위한 치료프로그램 개발연구-프로그램 개발을 위한 실태조사" (2011), 한국형사정책연구원
  11. 윤정숙, "교정시설내 성범죄자의 치료프로그램 참여에 대한 질적 연구", 교정담론, 6(1), pp.215~242 (2012), 아시아교정포럼[DOI]
  12. 윤정숙, "교정시설내 성범죄자 치료프로그램 평가연구:치료내 변화(within-treatment change)를 중심으로", 교정담론, 13(1), pp.99~126 (2019), 아시아교정포럼
  13. 정수임, "과학과 자기보고식 정의적 영역 평가의 정확성에 영향을 주는 요소 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 39(3), pp.363~377 (2019), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  14. 성폭력범죄자 교정・치료 및 교육의 문제점과 개선방안, "조주은", 국회입법조사처, ~, pp.이슈와 논점 제530호 (2012)
  15. 최광성, "교정시설 내 성폭력 치료프로그램이 고위험 성범죄자의 강간통념에 미치는 효과분석", 교정담론, 14(3), pp.117~143 (2020), 아시아교정포럼
  16. Abel, G. G., "Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters", Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, pp.81~95 (1998)
  17. Abel,G.G., "Sex ofender: Identification, risk asses sment, treatment, and legal issues", pp.101~118 (2009), Oxford University Press
  18. Aos, S., "The Comparative Costs and Benefits of Programs To Reduce Crime. Version 4.0", ~ (2001)
  19. Arnett, J., "Sensation seeking : A new conceptualization and a new scale", Personality and Individual Differences, 16, pp.289~296 (1994)
  20. Beech, A., "Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programs", Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9(3), pp.219~237 (1997)
  21. Becker, J., "What we know and don’t know about assessing and treating sex offenders", Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 4, pp.116~137 (1998)
  22. Brown, S., "Treating Sex Offenders An introduction to sex offender Treatment programmes" (2005), Willan Publishing
  23. Burt, M. R., "Justifying personal violence: A comparison of rapists and the general public", Victimology (1983)
  24. Cortoni, F., "Sex as a coping mechanism and its relationship to loneliness and intimacy deficits in sexual offending", Paper presented at the 15th Annual Researchand Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders (1996)
  25. Drapeau, M., "Research on the processes involved in treating sexual offenders", Sexual Abuse : A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(2), pp.117~125 (2005)
  26. Hall, G. C. N., "Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, pp.802~809 (1995)
  27. Hanson, R. K., "Predicting relapse : A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies", Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 66(2), pp.348~362 (1998)
  28. Hanson, R. K., "Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism", Criminal Justice and behavior, 27(1), pp.6~35 (2000)
  29. Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis, "Hanson, R. K.", Public safety and emergency preparedness canada, ~, pp.2004-02 (2004)
  30. Harkins, L., "A review of the factors that can influence the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment : Risk, need, responsivity, and process issues", Aggression and violent behavior, 12(6), pp.615~627 (2007)
  31. Helmus, L., "Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis", Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(1), pp.34~53 (2013)
  32. Hough, L., "Criterion-related validity of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities", Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, pp.581~595 (1990)
  33. Hudson, K., "Offending Identities: Sex Offenders’ Perspectives on their Treatment and Management", British Journal of Criminology, 46(2), pp.359~361 (2005)
  34. Holmes, S. T., "Sex crimes, Patterns and behaviors" (2002), Sage Publications
  35. 김명소, "성격검사의 형식이 응답왜곡(faking)에 미치는 효과:Normative 형식과 ipsative 형식의 비교", 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 19(3), pp.371~393 (2006), 한국산업및조직심리학회
  36. Marshall, W. L., "Cognitive behavioural treatment of sexual offenders", ~ (1999)
  37. Marshall, W. L., "A brief history of behavioral and cognitive behavioral approaches to sexual offender treatment: Part 2. The modern era", Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, pp.93~120 (2003)
  38. Marshall, W. L., "Therapist style in sexual offender treatment:Influence on indices of change", Sexual Abuse, 17, pp.109~116 (2005)
  39. Marshall, W. L., "Working positively with sexual offenders: Maximizing the effectiveness of treatment", Journal of interpersonal violence, 20(9), pp.1096~1114 (2005)
  40. Ward, T., "Attachment style and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A theoretical Famework", Sexual Abuse, 7(4), pp.317~335 (1995)
  41. Ward, T., "Cognitive distortions in sex offenders : An integrative review", Clinical psychology review, 17(5), pp.479~507 (1997)
  42. Ward, T., "The treatment of sex offenders : Risk management and good lives", Professional psychology : Research and practice, 34(4), pp.353~ (2003)
  43. Ward, T., "Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders:A positive approach to sex offender treatment", Positive psychology in practice, pp.598~616 (2004)
  44. Ward, T., "Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation : The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders", Aggression and violent behavior, 11(1), pp.77~94 (2006)
  45. Wilson, R. J., "Effective interventions and the Good Lives Model : Maximizing treatment gains for sexual offenders", Aggression and violent behavior, 14(3), pp.157~161 (2009)
  46. Yalom, I. D., "The theory and practice of group psychotherapy" (1995), Basic Books
  47. Yates, P. M., "Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment and management of sex offenders", Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 12(3, pp.4) (2003), 195~232
  48. Watson, David, "Affects Separable and Inseparable: On the Hierarchical Arrangement of the Negative Affects", Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 62(3), pp.489~505 (1992)
  49. West, S. C., "Structural equation modeling: Issues, concepts, and applications", pp.56~75 (1995), Sage
  50. Zuckerman, M., "Dimensions of sensation seeking", Journal of Consultingand Clinical Psychology, 36(1), pp.45~52 (1971)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)