본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국제지역연구로서 중국학의 방법론에 대한 고찰

Study on the research methodology of Chinese Studies as an international area studies

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In general, International area studies integrates all the issues including culture, history, politics, and society, focusing on a certain international area like China. Therefore, this study requires comprehensive analysis capability for wide fields such as culture, history, politics, economy etc. about a certain area. Accordingly, when compared to study methodologies requested by single academic category like existing politics, economics, cultural studies, historical studies etc., it would be natural that this requires more comprehensive, interdisciplinary thinking. But limitation of study method in international area studies including sinology has always become an important issue in the study realm - related scholars mainly quoted methodology of existing academic studies because independent study methodology for International area studies is still poor. Due to such limitation of methodology, scholars with critical view in the nations where International area studies including sinology are comparatively active have discussed problems of their academic study, and suggested main issue of limitation as an independent academic studies. In Korea, International area study actively started after middle 1990s, so it can be said that study on its study methodology just actively started. In the body, the author analyzed problems of study methodology in international area studies including sinology discussed until now. Based on its results, the study intended to discuss possibility of study methodology which can overcome issue of study methodology under going and can bring more objective study results, considering integrated and interdisciplinary aspects of international area study.

Abstract

In general, International area studies integrates all the issues including culture, history, politics, and society, focusing on a certain international area like China. Therefore, this study requires comprehensive analysis capability for wide fields such as culture, history, politics, economy etc. about a certain area. Accordingly, when compared to study methodologies requested by single academic category like existing politics, economics, cultural studies, historical studies etc., it would be natural that this requires more comprehensive, interdisciplinary thinking. But limitation of study method in international area studies including sinology has always become an important issue in the study realm - related scholars mainly quoted methodology of existing academic studies because independent study methodology for International area studies is still poor. Due to such limitation of methodology, scholars with critical view in the nations where International area studies including sinology are comparatively active have discussed problems of their academic study, and suggested main issue of limitation as an independent academic studies. In Korea, International area study actively started after middle 1990s, so it can be said that study on its study methodology just actively started. In the body, the author analyzed problems of study methodology in international area studies including sinology discussed until now. Based on its results, the study intended to discuss possibility of study methodology which can overcome issue of study methodology under going and can bring more objective study results, considering integrated and interdisciplinary aspects of international area study.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 박광섭, "국제지역학입문" (2001), 도서출판 대경
  2. 한국의 중국학과 중국의 한국학 : 연구추세의 비교분석, "이규태", 경제·인문사회연구회, ~ (2010)
  3. 張耀元, "한국에서 중국학연구와 교육현황", pp.2015
  4. 국가연구개발사업의 학제간 연구현황과 시사점, "주혜정", 한국과학기술기획평가원, ~ (2011)
  5. 진경수, "지역연구, 어떻게 하나" (1999), 서울대학교 출판부
  6. 최영호, "세계지역의 이해" (2001), 인간사랑
  7. 忻劍飛著, "世界的中國觀-近二千年世界對中國的認識史綱" (1991), 三聯書店
  8. 陳倩, "區域中國與文化中國-文明對話中的施堅雅模式" (2013), 人民出版社
  9. 中国现代化战略研究课题组, "中国科学院中国现代化研究中心,《中国现代化 报告2003—现代化理论、进程与展望》" (2003), 北京大学出版社
  10. 金珍鎬, "중국학 연구분야와 그 방법론에 대한 고찰", 現代中國硏究, 5(2) (2003)
  11. 金衡鍾, "中國學硏究와 인터넷의 활용", 東亞文化, (36) (1998), 서울대학교 동아문화연구소
  12. 이원택, "동아시아에서 한국학과 중국학의 발전방향", 동북아역사문제, (94) (2015), 동북아역사재단
  13. 이욱연, "G2시대 중국 지식인의 ‘중국’재발견과 한국 인문 중국학의 과제", 중국학논총, (43), pp.383~436 (2014), 중국학연구소
  14. 해외지역연구의 지원 및 인력양성 방안연구, "이성형", 한국연구재단, ~ (2010)
  15. 이중희, "지역연구방법의 범위와 특성", 2001년도 한국사회학회전기사회학대회발표논문 (2001)
  16. 임규섭, "한국의 중국연구 어제와 오늘 -중국연구자의 고민과 반성-", 아태연구, 14(2), pp.161~180 (2007), 국제지역연구원
  17. 임마누엘 페스트라이쉬, "서울은 세계적 담론과 사조를 생산하지 못할까", 중앙일보, ~ (2014)
  18. 정다송, "중국 지역학연구에 이용되는 웹사이트활용실태분석에 관한 연구(CSF : China Specialist Forum 을 중심으로)", 디지털컨텐츠학회논문지, 14(4), pp.565~571 (2013), 한국디지털콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  19. 하병주, "지역학의 정체성과 패러다임 모색 I", 지중해지역연구, 9(1), pp.249~276 (2007), 지중해지역원
  20. 황달기, "지역 연구 어떻게 할 것인가?- 일본지역연구 방법론 모색을 위한 시론 -", 일본어문학, (22), pp.477~504 (2003), 일본어문학회
  21. 황동연, "21세기 전야 미국지역연구(Area Studies)의 운명-전지구화와 그에 따른 지역연구의 방향에 대한 미국학계의 비판적 논의", 동아시아역사연구, 6 (1999)
  22. Bates, Robert, "Area Studies and the Discipline : A Useful Controversy", Political Science & Politics, XXX(2) (1997)
  23. Hans Kuuper, "What‘’s Wrong with the Study of China", Contries, pp.II(ⅩⅧ), ~
  24. Ward, Robert, "Foreign Area Studies and the Social Science Research Council", Items, 48(4) (1974)
  25. G. Williamm Skinner, "The Structure of Chinese History", Journal of Asian Studies, XLIV(2) (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)