본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학생 팀웍역량 검사의 개발 및 타당화 연구

Development and Validation of Collegiate Teamwork Competency Test

최윤미
한국직업교육학회|2011.06|직업교육연구 (The Journal of Vocational Education Research)|제30권 제2호|pp. 173-196

0

조회

0

다운로드

30

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

대학생핵심역량College students타당화ValidationTeamwork직업기초능력상황판단검사팀웍Key competency팀웍역량팀웍역량 검사Vocational skillsTeamwork competencyTeamwork inventorySituational judgment test
주제분류교육학

초록

팀웍역량은 예비사회인인 대학생이 갖추어야 할 중요한 직업기초능력 중 하나이다. 따라서 대학생이 갖추어야 할 팀웍역량의 요소에는 무엇이 있는지 탐색하고, 개인의 팀웍역량 수준을 측정․평가할 필요가 있다. 이를 위해서 이 연구에서는 대학생이 갖추어야 할 직업기초능력으로서의 팀웍역량의 개념과 구인을 탐색하고, 팀웍역량을 측정․평가하는 검사를 개발하였으며, 개발된 검사의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하였다. 팀웍의 구성요인에 관한 선행연구를 바탕으로 이 연구에서는 대학생의 팀웍역량을 ‘대학생이 팀을 이루어 과업을 수행하기 위해 필요한 역량’으로 정의하였다. 이는 대학생이 팀 과업 수행 상황에서 겪을 수 있는 다양한 상황에서 효과적으로 그리고 적절하게 대응할 수 있는 능력을 광범위하게 포괄하고, 그 하위영역을 ① 과제수행역량, ② 대인관계역량, ③ 의사결정역량의 세 가지로 설정하였다. 이 연구에서는 이 세 가지 영역을 진단할 수 있는 문항을 개발하여 총 537명의 대학생을 대상으로 검사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과, ‘대학생팀웍역량검사’의 총점과 하위영역들 간의 상관은 대체로 통계적으로 유의했고, 모형의 적합도 지수는 좋은 모형이라고 할 수 있는 기준을 모두 충족시켜, 연구에서 제안한 세 개의 하위영역은 서로 유기적인 관계 속에서 대학생의 팀웍역량이라는 개념을 구성하고 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 검사의 신뢰도 역시 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 이 연구는 대학교육 맥락에서의 팀웍역량을 개념화하고, 대학생에게 요구되는 직업기초능력으로서의 팀웍역량 개발 방향에 대한 시사점을 제공하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument measuring collegiate teamwork competency. Extensive literature review was conducted in order to identify sub-domains of collegiate teamwork competency. Collegiate teamwork competency was conceptualized as competency that is essential for college students to perform their tasks in teams. ① task performance competency, ② interpersonal competency, and ③ decision making competency were suggested as its sub-domains of collegiate teamwork competency. The expert group in the field of vocational competency and education approved the content validity of the test items. Item validity and reliability were examined through the preliminary test, and the final version of the test with 30 items was built. 537 college students took the test. The validity of collegiate teamwork competency test was examined through correlation coefficient among sub-domains and confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation model, and the reliability was tested through Cronbach's coefficient alpha. The results indicated that the intercorrelations between the scores of three sub-domains and the composite score of collegiate teamwork competency test (r=.51～.78, p<.01) were statistically significant. Confirmatory factor analysis result using structural equation model suggested that some of the fit indices (=3.086, CFI=.999, NNFI=.996, RMSEA=.022) which supported that empirical data collected for this study showed very good fit to the model of collegiate teamwork competency. The reliability using Cronbach's coefficient alpha was also found to be low to acceptable. Findings were discussed in terms of pedagogical implications on developing and enhancing college students' teamwork competency.

참고문헌 (74)

  1. 김병목, "팀웍과 팀웍의 결정요인에 대한 측정도구 개발", 석사, pp.2005
  2. 나승일, "직업기초능력의 영역분류 및 하위 요소 추출", 직업교육연구, 17(2), pp.15~37 (1998)
  3. 박동열, "대학생의 직업기초능력 유형 진단 도구 개발과 타당화 연구", 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 38(2), pp.225~245 (2006), 한국농·산업교육학회
  4. 박동열, "실무교육중심대학에서의 학습능력 향상프로그램에 관한 요구분석", 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 36(1), pp.145~167 (2004), 한국농·산업교육학회
  5. 박원우, "팀웍의 개념, 측정 및 증진방법" (2006), 서울: 서울대학교출판부
  6. 성태제, "타당도와 신뢰도" (2002), 서울: 학지사
  7. 윤우제, "개인의 팀웍 스킬 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구", 석사, pp.2007
  8. 직업능력인증제 도입을 위한 정책연구, "이무근", 서울: 교육부, ~ (1997)
  9. 성인의 직업기초능력 프로그램 실태 조사, "이정표", 서울: 한국직업능력개발원, ~ (2004)
  10. 이홍민, "핵심역량 핵심인재" (2003), 서울: 한국능률협회
  11. 임현수, "교직수행지능검사의 타당화 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  12. 장창원, "지식․정보화 사회의 직업세계와 직업능력", 진로교육연구, 11, pp.19~60 (2000)
  13. 정철영, "농업계열 전문대학 재학생의 직업기초능력 향상방안", 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 33(2), pp.1~22 (2001), 한국농·산업교육학회
  14. 대학생 직업기초능력 선정 및 문항개발연구, "진미석", 서울: 한국직업능력개발원, ~ (2007)
  15. 최윤미, "관리자리더십검사 개발 연구:암묵지를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2008
  16. 최윤미, "대학에서의 ‘좋은 팀웍’의 특성 및 유형에 대한 대학원생의 인식 연구", 아시아교육연구, 10(3), pp.257~283 (2009), 교육연구소
  17. 홍세희, "구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거", 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), pp.161~177 (2000)
  18. Alexander, L. T., "System training and research in team behavior. Santa Monica" (1965), CA: System Development Corporation
  19. Baker, D. P., "Principles for measuring teamwork skills: A summary and look toward the future. In: Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications", pp.197~204 (1997), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumn Associates
  20. Barrick, M. R., "Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness", Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), pp.377~391 (1998)
  21. Bath, D., "Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum", Higher Education Research and Development, 23, pp.313~328 (2004)
  22. Belbin,R.M, "Team roles at work" (1993), Oxford: Butterworth-Heinermann
  23. Biggers, K. E., "Automatic generation of communication and teamwork within multi-agent teams", Applied Artificial Intelligence, 15, pp.875~916 (2001)
  24. Boyatzis,R.E, "The competent manager: A model of effective performance" (1982), NY: John Wiley & Sons
  25. Brannick, M. T., "The measurement of team process", Human Factors, 37(3), pp.641~651 (1995)
  26. Candy,P.C, "Learning and earning: Graduate skills for an uncertain future", Paper presented at the International Lifelong Learning Conference (2000), Yeppoon, Australia
  27. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., "Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In: Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations", pp.333~380 (1995), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  28. Champion, M. A., "Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups", Personnel Psychology, 46, pp.823~850 (1993)
  29. Chan, D., "Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions", Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), pp.143~159 (2002)
  30. Cohen, S. G., "What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite", Journal of Management, 23(3), pp.239~290 (1997)
  31. Coyle-Shapiro,J, "The impact of a TQM intervention on teamwork: A longitudinal assessment", Employee Relations, 17(3), pp.63~74 (1995)
  32. Dickinson, T. L., "A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In: Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications", pp.289~310 (1997), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumn Associates
  33. Flanagan,J.C, "The critical incident technique", Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), pp.327~358 (1954)
  34. Fredrick,T.A, "Facilitating better teamwork: Analyzing the challenges and strategies of classroom-based collaboration", Business Communication Quarterly, 71, pp.439~455 (2008)
  35. Gaddy, C. D., "Team skills training in nuclear power operations. In: Teams: Their training and performance", pp.379~396 (1992), Norweed, MJ: Ablex
  36. Gladatein,D.L, "Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness", Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp.499~517 (1984)
  37. Goodman, P. S., "Creating long-term organizational change. In: Change in organizations: New perspectives on theory, and practice" (1982), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  38. Goodman, P. S., "Current thinking about groups: Setting the stage for new ideas. In: Designing effective work group", pp.1~33 (1986), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  39. Hackman,J.R, "The design of work teams. In: Handbook of organizational behavior", pp.315~342 (1987), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  40. Hatcher, L., "From individual incentives to an organization-wide gain sharing plan: Effects on teamwork and product quality", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(3), pp.169~183 (1991)
  41. Hayes,N, "Managing teams" (2002), London: Thomas Learning
  42. Hedlund, J., "Identifying and assessing tacit knowledge: Understanding the practical intelligence of military leaders", The Leadership Quarterly, 14(2), pp.117~140 (2003)
  43. Hughes,L, "How to be a good listener", Woman in Business, 55(6), pp.22~ (2003)
  44. Johnston, J. H., "Performance measurement tools for enhancing team decision-making training. In: Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications", pp.253~287 (1997), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumn Associates
  45. Katzenbach, J. R., "The discipline of teams", Harvard Business Review, 46, pp.111~120 (1993)
  46. Kinlaw,D.C, "Developing superior work teams: Building quality and the competitive edge" (1991), San Diego, CA: Lexington Books
  47. Kinlaw,D.C, "The practice of empowerment" (1995), Hampshire, England
  48. Larson, J. R., "Group goals, group coordination, and group member motivation", Human Performance, 6, pp.49~69 (1993)
  49. Laughlin, P. R., "Demonstrablility and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, pp.177~189 (1986)
  50. Laughlin, P. R., "Collective induction: Mutual group and individual influence by exchange of hypotheses and evidence", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, pp.567~589 (1986)
  51. Levin, J. M., "Progress in small group research", Annual Review of Psychology, 41, pp.585~634 (1990)
  52. Marks, M. A., "A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes", Academy of Management Review, 26, pp.356~376 (2001)
  53. McDaniel, M. A., "Situational judgment test; Validity and an integrative model. In: Situational judgment test: Theory, measurement and application" (2006), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumn Associates
  54. McIntyre, R. M., "Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environment. In: Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations", pp.9~45 (1995), San Francisco, CA: Jossey -Bass
  55. Mento, A. J., "A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, pp.50~77 (1987)
  56. Mohrman, S. A, "Designing team-based organization: New forms knowledge work" (1995), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  57. Mohrman,S.A, "Designing work for knowledge-based competition. In: Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management", pp.94~123 (2003), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  58. Measurement of team behavior in a navy environment, "Morgan, B. B.", FL: Naval Training Systems Center, Human Factors Division, ~, pp.Tech Report TR-86-014 (1986)
  59. Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric theory(3rd ed.)" (1994), NY: McGraw-Hill
  60. O'Neil, H. F., Ⅱ., "Use of networked simulations as a context to measure team competencies. In: Workforce readiness: Competencies an assessment", pp.411~452 (1997), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  61. O'Neil, H. F., Jr., "Review of workforce readiness theoretical frameworks. In: Workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment", pp.3~25 (1997), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  62. Toward a definition of teamwork: An analysis of critical team behaviors, "Oser, R.", Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research, ~, pp.Technical Report NTSC 89-004 (1989)
  63. Prince, A., "The Measurement of team process behaviors. In: Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications", pp.289~310 (1997), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumn Associates
  64. "Shoemaker, J. A.(2007). Construct validity of situational judgment tests: An examination of the effects of agreeableness, organizational leadership culture, and experience on SJT responses. Theses and Dissertations, Paper 2363"[URL]
  65. Smith-Jentsch, K. A., "Measuring teamwork mental models to support training needs assessment, development, and evaluation: Two empirical studies", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, pp.179~194 (2001)
  66. St. Germain, L., "Investigation of tacit knowledge in principal leadership", The Education Forum, 70(1), pp.75~90 (2005)
  67. Tesluck, P. E., "Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness", Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), pp.200~217 (1999)
  68. Wagner,R.K, "Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behavior", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), pp.1236~1247 (1987)
  69. Wagner, R. K., "Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), pp.436~458 (1985)
  70. Wagner, R. K., "Tacit Knowledge Inventory for Sales. Written. Unpublished test", ~ (1989)
  71. Weekly, J. A., "Video-based situational testing", Personnel Psychology, 50, pp.25~49 (1997)
  72. Weekley, J. A., "Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement and application" (2006), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumn Associates
  73. Weekley, J. A., "On the development of situational judgment test: Issues in item development, scaling, and scoring. In: Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement and application" (2006), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumn Associates
  74. Weingart,L.R, "Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, pp.682~693 (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

팀웍 역량의 구성요인 탐색 및 진단도구 개발: 남녀 대학생을 중심으로김명소, 한영석한국여성심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:여성2010 · 제15권 제1호대학생 진로 역량 검사 개발 및 타당화 연구정은이한국교육방법학회 · 교육방법연구2015 · 제27권 제3호대학생 핵심역량 진단도구 개발 및 타당화 연구-A대학 사례를 중심으로김희연, 민경석, 정지영한국교양교육학회 · 교양교육연구2018 · 제12권 제3호대학생용 핵심역량 진단 검사(K-CCCA)의 개발이하원, 이화선한국교양교육학회 · 교양교육연구2017 · 제11권 제1호대학생 핵심역량 척도 개발 및 타당화- P대학교 학생을 중심으로 -전보라, 정상훈교육발전연구소 · 교육혁신연구2018 · 제28권 제4호대학생 핵심역량 자가진단 평가도구 개발 및 타당화 연구김경이, 박영신, 안현아, 양길석, 장미숙한국교육방법학회 · 교육방법연구2017 · 제29권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

외국의 중등 직업교육과정 동향 분석박윤희, 최동선, 이림, 장규선, 장명희pp. 1-33중학생의 부모화 경향성과 부모양육태도 지각이 대인관계문제에 미치는 영향: 수치심 경향성을 매개변인으로천성문, 주동범, 박현정pp. 35-49전문계 고등학교에서 팀 기반 학습방법이 학습자의 과제수행, 학습활동, 동기에 미치는 영향남정권, 이수영, 이영민, 조형정pp. 51-71기술수용모형을 기반으로 직업탐색효능감과 직업방송의 유용성, 용이성이 시청자의 만족도에 미치는 영향 분석민경일, 이혜선, 김지심, 홍유나, 정애경pp. 73-89청소년 진로포부 영향 요인 구조 분석송병국, 김경주pp. 91-115
원문 보기