韩-欧FTA中与ILO相关条款纷争及对中国的启示
Study on the Disputes of Korea-EU FTA Caused by ILO-related Substantive Terms and Implications to China
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
在过去的20年里,劳工标准在自由贸易协定中被广泛使用。美国、欧盟和中国都积极与各自的贸易伙伴签订自由贸易协定，在劳工标准问题上形成了各自不同的风格。该研究认为，在和中国文化相似的韩国、韩-欧FTA签署后，FTA和ILO相关条款的纷争一直持续，给韩-欧FTA的实施带来困难。因为为了打破这个僵局，相关学者虽然做了很多研究，但主要集中在经贸领域。因此本文首次系统地研究了FTA和ILO相关条款纷争的实质焦点，并仔细分析了韩国修改的国内法，借鉴韩国国内法的修改模式为中国提供建议和启示。这是从一个新的视角:韩-欧FTA和ILO争议的本质是国际法和国内法的冲突，是自贸协定和人权保护的冲突。认为应该从法理和人权保护方面整理纷争的本质，积极的协调自由贸易与人权保护，为了使中国更积极的融入国际经济，应以积极的态度来修改的完善本国的法律，实现国际贸易与人权保护共同发展的目的。
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, labor standards have been widely used in free trade agreements. The U.S., the European Union and China have all aggressively signed free trade agreements with their trading partners, developing different styles on labor standards. According to the study, the implementation of the KOREa-EU FREE trade agreement has been hampered by ongoing disputes over the terms of the FREE trade agreement and the ILO since the korea-EU free trade agreement was signed. Because in order to break this deadlock, relevant scholars have done a lot of research, but mainly focused on the economic and trade field. Therefore, this paper for the first time systematically studies the substantive focus of disputes over FTA and ILO clauses, and carefully analyzes the domestic law amended by South Korea, and provides suggestions and inspirations for China by drawing lessons from the revision model of South Korea's domestic law. This is from a new perspective: the essence of the korea-EU FTA and ILO disputes is the conflict between international law and domestic law, and the conflict between free trade agreements and human rights protection. It holds that the essence of disputes should be sorted out from the perspective of legal principles and human rights protection, and the free trade and human rights protection should be actively coordinated. In order to make China more actively integrate into the international economy, China should adopt a positive attitude to revise and perfect its own laws, so as to realize the purpose of common development of international trade and human rights protection.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김상만, "국제노동기구(ILO)의 핵심협약과 FTA 협정상의 노동 조항(노동 장)에 대한 고찰", 법학연구, 17(2), pp.219~243 (2014), 법학연구소
- 김홍영, "결사의 자유 협약, 강제노동 금지 협약 비준의 쟁점과 과제", 서울법학, 27(2), pp.225~252 (2019), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소[DOI]
- 김미영, "미국의 노동기준 연계 무역정책과 한미FTA 노동조항의 전망", 안암법학, (45), pp.31~69 (2014), 안암법학회[DOI]
- 박지순, "ILO 핵심협약의 비준과 노조법 개정안을 둘러싼 쟁점과 과제", 안암법학, (61), pp.1~46 (2020), 안암법학회[DOI]
- 조성혜, "공무원의 노동기본권에 관한 비교법적 고찰 - ILO협약과 독일․영국 법제와의 비교를 중심으로 -", 공법학연구, 19(4), pp.131~171 (2018), 한국비교공법학회[DOI]
- Labour provisions in free trade agreements: Fostering their consistency with the ILO standards system, "Agustí-Panareda, J.", International Labour Office, ~ (2014)
- Barbu M, "The trade-labour nexus: global value chains and labour provisions in European Union free trade agreements", Global Labour Journal (2018)
- Cooper W H, "EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement and Its Implications for the United States" (2011), DIANE Publishing
- Harrison，J, "Governing labour standards through free trade agreements: limits of the European Union's trade and sustainable development chapters", JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies (2019)
- 博登海默, "法理学，法哲学及其方法" (1999), 中国政法大学出版社
- 丁岩, "国际贸易体制中的劳工标准问题探究", 产业与科技论坛, (8) (2013)
- 侯鲜明, "国际贸易中的劳工标准之争与对策分析", 科学经济社会, (4) (2006)
- 刘宏松, "全球劳工治理: 主体，现状与困境", 上海交通大学学报哲学社会科学版, (1) (2018)
- 张彬, "欧盟-韩国自贸协定对中国与双方间贸易的影响验证与分析", 亚太经济, (2) (2017)
- 朱颖, "解析欧盟韩国自由贸易协定", 世界贸易组织动态与研究, (1) (2012)
- 李西霞, "自由贸易协定中劳工标准的发展态势", 环球法律评论, (1) (2015)
- 程晓霞, "国际法" (1999), 中国人民大学出版社
- 陈钰, "国际劳工标准比较及影响因素分析", 经济论坛, (4) (2019)
- 雷元亮, "浅析国际劳工标准与国际贸易的关系问题", 大众商务：下半月, (2) (2010)
- 程卫东, "多元法律秩序与欧盟法治的局限性", 欧洲研究, (1) (2016)
- 吴汉东, "知识产权法价值的中国语境解读", 中国法学, (2) (2013)