본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국과 중국이 ASEAN과 체결한 FTA 분쟁해결협정 비교고찰

A Comparison of Korea and China’s FTA Dispute Settlement Agreements Concluded with ASEAN

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

With the Korea–China FTA negotiations currently on the line, the importance of research into the FTA dispute settlement system has been increasing. In this paper, a comparison of Korea and China’s FTA dispute settlement agreements concluded with ASEAN is contemplated, and implications for the future of the Korea–China FTA have been suggested. The FTA dispute settlement agreements with ASEAN concluded by both Korea and China provide perspectives on both sides. This agreement with ASEAN also provides a standard for the potential Korea–China FTA agreement. Specifically, the basis of these agreements with ASEAN is the same, although there are clear distinctions, described in a more detailed manner. A problem arises when there has been no discussion on dispute settlement agreements in Korea, especially of the agreement with ASEAN, whereas the opposite is true of the China counterpart. In this paper, Chinese academic FTA dispute settlement agreement studies have been also examined.

Abstract

With the Korea–China FTA negotiations currently on the line, the importance of research into the FTA dispute settlement system has been increasing. In this paper, a comparison of Korea and China’s FTA dispute settlement agreements concluded with ASEAN is contemplated, and implications for the future of the Korea–China FTA have been suggested. The FTA dispute settlement agreements with ASEAN concluded by both Korea and China provide perspectives on both sides. This agreement with ASEAN also provides a standard for the potential Korea–China FTA agreement. Specifically, the basis of these agreements with ASEAN is the same, although there are clear distinctions, described in a more detailed manner. A problem arises when there has been no discussion on dispute settlement agreements in Korea, especially of the agreement with ASEAN, whereas the opposite is true of the China counterpart. In this paper, Chinese academic FTA dispute settlement agreement studies have been also examined.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 蔡霜, "WTO与中国-东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制的比较", 玉林师范学院学报 哲学社会科学版, 1 (2007)
  2. 丁丽柏, "论CAFTA争端解决机制的完善", 现代法学, 3 (2009)
  3. 谷婀娜, "试析CAFTA下的 中国-东盟争端解决机制协议", 公民与法, 4 (2012)
  4. 최송자, "区域贸易协议争端解决机制构建与实效反差研究", 国际贸易问题, 12 (2010)
  5. 蒋德翠, "中国-东盟争端解决机制探析", 东南亚纵横, 12 (2011)
  6. 廖增金, "中国-东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制之比较分析", 法制与社会 (2010)
  7. 娄万锁, "国际制度视角下区域贸易争端解决机制研究", 兰州学刊, 3 (2012)
  8. 李莉, "论中国-东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制中仲裁的运用和完善", 司法改革论评 (2009)
  9. 李珊, "关于完善中国-东盟争端解决机制的立法思考", 桂海论丛, 1 (2011)
  10. 樊安, "构建更具司法性的中国-东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制", 学术探索, 1 (2011)
  11. 石现明, "论中国-东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制之仲裁制度研究", 云南大学学报法学版, 2 (2010)
  12. 孙志煜, "国际制度的表达与实践-以中国-东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制为样本的分析", 暨南学报, 3 (2012), 哲学社会科学版
  13. 宋锡祥, "论中国-东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制及其完善", 时代法学, 5 (2006)
  14. 肖小文, "CAFTA争端解决机制的法律探讨", 学术论坛, 3 (2011)
  15. 杨丽艳, "试论中国-东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制", 安徽大学学报, 4 (2008), 哲学社会科学版
  16. 周江, "也谈中国-东盟自由贸易区仲裁机制的完善", 仲裁研究, 16 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)