본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

19세기 서울 지역의 생원과 진사 -구한말 호적을 중심으로-

Study on the Classic and Literary Licentiates of Seoul in 19th Century -Focusing on the Family Registers During the Late Period of Chosun-

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

지금까지의 생원 진사 연구는 그들의 거주지․성관․전력․진로․가문적 배경 등을 밝히는 데 그치고 있다. 본고는 기존의 연구 방법을 보완하기 위해 조선말의 호적을 통해 한성부의 생원․진사 계층을 분석한 것이다. 본고에서 대상으로 삼은 구한말 호적에는 35,163인의 호주에 관한 기록이 담겨있다. 호적에 기재된 호주와 그들의 4祖의 직업란에 ‘생원’ 또는‘진사’로 기재된 경우는 401건이었으며, 전체 호주 가운데 진사 입격자는 53명으로 전체의0.15%에 해당했다. 진사 입격자 중 한성부 거주자는 42명으로 전국 합산의 79%에 해당한다. 호적 자료상 인구의 1/3 정도 불과한 한성부에서 사마시 합격자의 80% 정도를 배출한것이다. 호주뿐만 아니라 그들의 4조까지 확장하면, 서울 가호의 2.78%가 가계 내에 사마시 입격자를 보유하고 있었다. 이는 한성부를 제외한 전국 평균 0.25%의 11배에 해당하는 수치이다. 이 수치는 관직자 중 사마시 입격자를 포함하지 않은 것으로, 한성부 지역의 사마시입격 비율은 여타 지역과 비교할 수 없을 정도로 높았다. 또 부친이 품관인 경우를 살펴본다면, 지방은 12.5%였고, 한성부 지역은 35.1%였다. 한성부의 진사시 합격자의 경제적 위상을 밝히기 위해 가옥의 규모를 살펴보았다. 한성부에서 진사 합격자는 평균 가옥 규모가 15.3칸이었다. 그리고 한성부를 제외한 기타 지역의일반호 평균 가택 규모는 4.4칸이었다. 한성부 사마시 합격 가호가 대부분 瓦家에 거주하며, 한성부의 地價가 타 지역에 비해 높다는 점까지 감안한다면, 한성부의 사마시 입격호와지방 거주 일반호이 경제력 차이는 더 벌어진다. 호적 내 사마시 입격자 가운데, 진사는 353인, 생원은 48인이었다. 고종대 생원 대비 진사의 배출 비율은 대략 1.5배 정도였다. 호적상 진사가 생원보다 7.4배가 많았는데, 이는매우 특이한 수치이다. 특히 호주의 직업으로 ‘生員’을 기재한 경우는 全無했다. 이는 조선말 ‘生員’ 합격자가 ‘進士’를 칭하는 관례 때문이었다.

Abstract

In the Confucian society of Chosun, the gwageo(highest-level state examination to recruit ranking officials) played an important role in society. Although the gwageo was divided into liberal arts, military services, baccalaureat and civil services, liberal arts and the baccalaureat, that had the characteristics of a pre-exam for liberal arts, were considered particularly important in Chosun. The literary arts exam was important because it was the exam to recruit government officials. However, the baccalaureat was also considered important as the literary arts exam since it was the exam to recruit classic and literary licentiates. Not many people applied for the literary arts exam because the passing mark was high but the competition rate for the exam to recruit classic and literary licentiates was intense at 300~400:1. This was due to the fact that passing of the classic and literary licentiate examinations was the shortcut for not only individual success, but also, an honor for the family name. For such reasons, investigating the substance of Chosun’s classic and literary licentiates can be considered as a key factor in understanding the ruling power of the Chosun Dynasty. So far, the studies on classic and literary licentiates have stopped at revealing their residence and family backgrounds. The present study analyzed the classicand literary licentiates of Hanseongbu through the family registers of the late Chosun Dynasty to supplement the existing study method. In the family registry of the late period of Chosun, there are records of 35,163 heads of households. There were 401 cases, where the profession for the head of households and their 4 ancestors were listed as ‘classic licentiate’ and ‘literary licentiate’ in the family registry and among the entire family registry, there were 53 classic licentiates, which was approximately 0.15% of the total. Moreover, there were 42 residents of Hanseongbu among the candidates, which was 79% of the country’s total. This implies that Hanseongbu produced approximately 80% of successful candidates of the classic and literary licentiate examination, when the region was only 1/3 of the population. When expanding to their 4 ancestors instead of focusing on just the heads of households, there was 2.78% of Seoul households that had successful candidates of the classic and literary licentiate examination in their lineage. This number is 11 times the national average of 0.25% with the exclusion of the Hanseongbu. Furthermore, this number did not include the successful candidates among the officials, and the successful rate of the Hanseongbu region was so high that it could not be compared to any other region. When examining the cases where the fathers were high-ranking government officials, provinces were 12.5% and the Hanseongbu region was 35.1%. The size of homes were examined to reveal the economical status of successful candidates of the classic and literary licentiate examination of the Hanseongbu and the average size of homes for the successful candidates in the region was 15.3 rooms. Moreover, the average size of homes in regions excluding Hanseongbu was 4.4 rooms. When considering that the households in the Hanseongbu region with successful candidates of the classic and literary licentiate examination mostly lived in tile-roofed houses and price of land in Hanseongbu was higher than other regions, the economical gap between thefamilies with successful candidates in Hanseongbu and a normal families living in provinces widened further apart. Among the candidates of the classic and literary licentiate examination in the family registry, there were 353 literary licentiates and 48 classic licentiates. The discharge rate of literary licentiates was 1.5 times that of classic licentiates during King Gojong’s reign. On the family register, the number of literary licentiates was 7.4 times that of classic licentiates and this was a very unique number. The cases that listed classic licentiate as the profession for the head of the households were particularly nonexistent. This was due to the custom where successful candidates of classic licentiate examination were called as literary licentiates in the late period of Chosun.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. "經國大典", ~
  2. "國朝文科榜目", ~
  3. "司馬榜目", ~
  4. 李朝 生員ㆍ進士試의 硏究, "송준호", 국회도서관, ~ (1970)
  5. 최진옥, "朝鮮時代 生員進士硏究" (1998), 집문당
  6. 김경용, "조선조 과거제도 시행과정의 탐색 –식년시 문과와 생진과를 중심으로-", 교육사학연구, 25(1), pp.1~47 (2015), 교육사학회[DOI]
  7. 김경용, "四學課試 출신자의 생원·진사 진출실태 분석 - 1846년 식년생원진사시를 중심으로 -", 교육사학연구, 28(1), pp.1~28 (2018), 교육사학회[DOI]
  8. 김경용, "조선후기 경(京)ㆍ향(鄕)유생의 생원ㆍ진사 진출실태 비교연구-1846년 식년감시를 중심으로-", 한국교육사학, 31 (2018)
  9. 김의환, "영주지역 생원ㆍ진사 입격자와 사회적 지위", 국학연구, 35 (2018)
  10. 김의환, "충주지역 생원․진사 입격자와사회적 지위", 조선시대사학보, (91), pp.33~74 (2019), 조선시대사학회[DOI]
  11. 유호석, "1931年刊 『全州生進靑衿錄』 分析", 전북사학, (43), pp.213~254 (2013), 전북사학회
  12. 박현순, "17세기 科擧 관리의 정비 - 응시자 증가와 관련하여 -", 조선시대사학보, (49), pp.135~173 (2009), 조선시대사학회
  13. 원영환, "朝鮮時代 生員進士와 春川社會의 特性", 강원문화사연구, 3 (1998)
  14. 원창애, "지방 거주 생원 조세환의 문과 응시 실태 - 『趙世煥日記』를 중심으로 -", 사학연구, (139), pp.87~132 (2020), 한국사학회[DOI]
  15. 이남희, "조선시대 수원지역의 생원 진사시 합격자 연구", 역사와 실학, (51), pp.113~146 (2013), 역사실학회
  16. 이수환, "조선 향촌사회 속의 생원ㆍ진사", 한국사 시민강좌, 46 (2010)
  17. 진덕순, "조선시대 생원ㆍ진사의 방방 복식제도", 국학연구, 45 (2021)
  18. 崔珍玉, "조선시대 평안도의 생원 진사시 합격자 실태", 조선시대사학보, (36), pp.211~251 (2006), 조선시대사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)