본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

하향식 예산편성과 상향식 예산편성:비대칭 정보와 왜곡

An Analysis of Top-down Budgeting:Information Asymmetry and Distortive Allocation

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

This paper theoretically examines the effects of a top-down approach on budget preparation. In a benchmark model, information asymmetry between a spending ministry and a department of finance on benefits of public projects makes the top-down budgeting superior to the traditional bottom-up approach. If the spending ministry has distortive incentives as well as informational advantage, the gain from the top-down budgeting disappears. Lastly, it is shown that if a final screen stage by the department of finance is added to the top-down procedure, as it is in Korea, the distinction between the two becomes meaningless.

Abstract

This paper theoretically examines the effects of a top-down approach on budget preparation. In a benchmark model, information asymmetry between a spending ministry and a department of finance on benefits of public projects makes the top-down budgeting superior to the traditional bottom-up approach. If the spending ministry has distortive incentives as well as informational advantage, the gain from the top-down budgeting disappears. Lastly, it is shown that if a final screen stage by the department of finance is added to the top-down procedure, as it is in Korea, the distinction between the two becomes meaningless.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 강태혁, "총액배분자율편성(하향식)제도의 비교론적 관점: S공단의 사례", 정부회계연구, 4(2), pp.3~33 (2006), 한국정부회계학회
  2. 권민경, "탑다운 예산제도의 자율성 변화 분석", 한국행정연구, 18(4), pp.145~170 (2010), 한국행정연구원
  3. 하향식 예산제도에 의한 예산자원 배분방식의 효율화 방안, "권오성", 한국행정연구원, ~ (2008)
  4. 기획예산처, "사전 재원배분 제도 도입- 예산편성 방식의 혁신", 2004년 2월 24일 기획예산처 보도 자료의 붙임 자료, ~ (2014)
  5. 총액배분자율편성예산제도 평가 및 개선방안 연구, "김상헌", 기획재정부, ~ (2014)
  6. 총액배분자율편성(하향식) 예산제도 사례분석, "김상헌", 정부혁신지방분권위원회, ~ (2007)
  7. 윤성식, "정부혁신의 이론과 사례: 총액자율편성예산제도", 한국행정과 정책연구, 4(2), pp.29~50 (2006), 강원행정학회
  8. 이강호, "예산총액배분자율편성제도(Top-down System)의 도입효과에 관한 연구", 박사, 정책학, pp.2006
  9. 함성득, "총액배분자율편성제도의 효과에 관한 실증적 연구: 교육과학기술부 교육 분야 예산의 점증성을 중심으로", 행정논총, 48(4), pp.295~323 (2010), 한국행정연구소
  10. 최종하, "총액배분자율편성제도 도입 이후 부처자율성 제고에 대한 실증적 분석", 예산정책연구, 4(2), pp.176~210 (2015), 국회예산정책처
  11. Blöndal, Jón R, "Budgeting in Finland", OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2(2) (2002), OECD
  12. Cho, I-K, "Signaling games and stable equilibria", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, pp.179~221 (1987)
  13. Ferejohn, J.A, "The budget process and the size of the budget", American Journal of Political Science, 31, pp.296~320 (1987)
  14. Gardner, R., "Understanding Strategic Interaction: Essays in Honor of Reinhard Selten", pp.465~474 (1997), Springer-Verlag
  15. Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Central and Eastern European Countries, "Gleich, Holger", European Central Bank, ~, pp.European Central Bank Working Paper No. 215 (2003)
  16. Grossman, G. M., "Electoral Competition and Special Interest Politics", The Review of Economic Studies, 63(2), pp.265~286 (1996)
  17. Hendrick, Rebecca, "Budgetary Tradeoffs Under Top-down and Bottom-dup Budgeting", Public Budgeting and Financial Management, 4(2), pp.327~358 (1992)
  18. Karl-Martin Ehrhart, "Budget processes: Theory and experimental evidence", Games and Economic Behavior, 59, pp.279~295 (2007)
  19. Kim, John M, "Top-own Budgeting as a Tool for Central Resource Management", OECD Journal on Budgeting, 6(1) (2006), OECD
  20. Top-down Budgeting—An Instrument to Strengthen Budget Management, "Ljungman, Gosta", IMF, ~, pp.IMF working paper, WP (2009), 09[DOI]
  21. McCubbins, Mathew D, "The Politics of Flatland", Public Choice, 46, pp.45~60 (1985)
  22. Budgeting Practices and Procedures in OECD Countries, "OECD", ~ (2014)
  23. Budgeting Procedures and Fiscal Performance in the EC, "von Hagen, J", European Commission, ~ (1992)
  24. Woo, J., "Economic, Political, and Institutional Determinants of Public Deficits", Journal of Public Economics, 87, pp.387~426 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)