본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

朱熹의 “大學”과 士大夫의 사회·정치적 권력: 制度에서 心의 “學”으로

From Institution to the ‘Learning(Xue)’ of the Mind: Zhu Xi's ‘Great Learning’ and Sociopolitical Power of the Literati

0

조회

0

다운로드

31

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper explains Zhu Xi's concept of learning(xue) as a sociopolitical agenda mainly through the analysis of his understanding of ‘great learning’ as idea and text. Zhu Xi's sociopolitical agenda provided a new paradigm for Chinese society undergoing changes after the Tang-Song transition period. Zhu Xi presented his learning as an all encompassing single process through which the mind and society can be brought to order. He emphasized the investigation of things (gewu) as the way to find the unity and avoid social anarchy. His learning program based on the investigation of things strives to achieve the goal of resolving the problem of the subjectivity of the mind without sacrificing each individual's moral autonomy. Zhu Xi's idea of learning as a sociopolitical agenda offered a convincing way of life by which one could pursue self-cultivation and participation in social and political life at the same time to Song literati who were localized but aspired to be part of nation-wide networks and to have influence over social and political agenda of the empire.

Abstract

This paper explains Zhu Xi's concept of learning(xue) as a sociopolitical agenda mainly through the analysis of his understanding of ‘great learning’ as idea and text. Zhu Xi's sociopolitical agenda provided a new paradigm for Chinese society undergoing changes after the Tang-Song transition period. Zhu Xi presented his learning as an all encompassing single process through which the mind and society can be brought to order. He emphasized the investigation of things (gewu) as the way to find the unity and avoid social anarchy. His learning program based on the investigation of things strives to achieve the goal of resolving the problem of the subjectivity of the mind without sacrificing each individual's moral autonomy. Zhu Xi's idea of learning as a sociopolitical agenda offered a convincing way of life by which one could pursue self-cultivation and participation in social and political life at the same time to Song literati who were localized but aspired to be part of nation-wide networks and to have influence over social and political agenda of the empire.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Benjamin Elman, "Political, Social, and Cultural Reproduction via Civil Service Examinations in Late Imperial China", The Journal of Asian Studies, 50(1) (1991)
  2. Hilde De Weerdt, "Competition Over Content: Negotiating Standard for the Civil Service Examination in Imperial China(1127-1279)" (2007), Harvard University Asia Center
  3. Alan T. Wood, "Limits to Autocracy: From Sung Neo-Confucianism to a Doctrine of Political Rights" (1995), University of Hawai'i Press
  4. 王瑞來, "宋代の皇帝權力と士大夫政治" (2001), 汲古書院
  5. Wm. T. de Bary, "The Liberal Tradition in China" (1983), Columbia University Press
  6. Robert P. Hymes, "Statesmen and Gentlemen: The Elite of Fu-chou, Chiang-hsi, in Northern and Southern Sung" (1986), Cambridge University Press
  7. Peter K. Bol, "This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung Culture" (1992), Stanford University Press
  8. Peter K. Bol, "The 'Localist Turn' and 'Localist Identity' in Later Imperial China", Late Imperial China, 24(2) (2003)
  9. Peter K. Bol, "Neo-Confucianism and Local Society, Twelfth to Sixteenth Century: A Case Study, In The Song-Yuan-Ming Transition in Chinese History", pp.241~283 (2003), Harvard University Asia Center
  10. 市來津由彦, "朱熹門人集團形成の硏究" (2002)
  11. 土田健次郞, "道學の形成" (2002), 晶文社
  12. Robert Hymes, "Ordering the World: Approaches to State and Society in Sung Dynasty China" (1993), University of California Press
  13. Peter Ditmanson, "Contesting Authority: Intellectual Lineages and the Chinese Imperial Court from the 12th to the 15th Centuries", 박사, pp.1999
  14. Peter K. Bol, "Sarah Schneewind, Community Schools and the State in Ming China" (2006), Stanford University Press
  15. 이범학, "남송후기 理學의 보급과 官學化의 배경-이학계 인사들의 정치, 사회적 행동을 중심으로", 한국학논총, 17 (1994)
  16. 이범학, "眞德秀 경세 理學의 서립과 그 배경-남송 후기 이학의 官學化와 그 의의", 한국학논총, 20 (1997)
  17. 이범학, "원대 虞集(1272~1348)의 사상 -주.륙절충론을 중심으로-", 한국학논총, 29, pp.503~532 (2007), 한국학연구소
  18. "答江德功, In 朱熹集 4권", pp.2118~ (1996), 四川敎育出版社
  19. "朱子語類, In 朱子全書 17권", pp.3528~ (2002), 上海古籍出版社
  20. 程端禮, "讀書分年日程", ~
  21. "四書或問 1권, 朱子全書 6권", 513~514
  22. James T. C. Liu, "China Turning Inward, Intellectual-Political Changes in the Early Twelfth Century" (1989), Harvard University Asia Center
  23. 余英時, "朱熹的歷史世界:宋代士大夫政治文化的硏究" (2003), 允晨
  24. Peter K. Bol, "On the problem of contextualizing ideas: reflections on Yu Yingshi's approach to the study of Song Daoxue", (The Journal of Song-Yuan Studies, 34, pp.59~79 (2004)
  25. 佐野公治, "四書學史の硏究" (1988), 創文社
  26. "대학장구", ~
  27. "大學章句序", ~
  28. "中庸章句序", ~
  29. Yung Sik Kim, "The Natural Philosophy of Chu Hsi(1130-1200)" (2000), Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society
  30. "朱熹集", ~
  31. "「告子」 上, In 孟子", ~
  32. "土田健次郞", 159-256, 159~256 (2002)
  33. A. C. Graham, "Two Chinese Philosophers" (1992), Open Court
  34. Wm. T. de Bary, "Learning for one's self :Essays on the individual in Neo-Confucian thought" (1991), Columbia University Press
  35. 장윤수, "장재철학에 있어서 大心의 공부론", 철학연구, 88, pp.281~229 (2003), 대한철학회
  36. Yung Sik Kim, "Analogical Extension’(leitui) in Zhu Xi's methodology of ‘Investigation of Things’(gewu) and ‘Extension of Knowledge’(zhizhi)", The Journal of Song-Yuan Stuides, 34, pp.41~58 (2004)
  37. John Makeham, "Transmitters and Creators: Chinese Commentators and Commentaries on the Analects", pp.217~250 (2004), Harvard University Asia Center
  38. 垣內景子, "朱熹の經書注釋文獻の硏究·序說ー論語爲政篇吾十有五而志于學章をめぐって", 東洋の思想と宗敎, 18, pp.28~49 (2001)
  39. Daniel Gardener, "Learning to Be a Sage: Selections from the Conversations of Master Chu, Arranged Topically" (1990), University of California Press
  40. Hoyt Tillman, "Confucian Discourse and Chu Hsi's Ascendency", pp.202~230 (1992), University of Hawaii Press
  41. Peter K. Bol, "This Culture of Ours, In Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China", pp.300~342 (1992), Stanford University Press
  42. "二程文集 4권", 1~
  43. Daniel Gardner, "Principle and Pedagogy: Chu Hsi and the Four Books", Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 44(1) (1984)
  44. Daniel Gardner, "Modes of Thinking and Modes of Discourse in the Sung: Some Thoughts in the Yu-lu(“Records of Conversations”) Texts", The Journal of Asian Studies, 50(3) (1991)
  45. Daniel Gardner, "Confucian Commentary and Chinese Intellectual History", The Journal of Asian Studies, 57(2) (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)