본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『齊民要術』에 보이는 動植物의 배양과 胡漢 農業文化의 融合

The Cultivation of animals and plants and The fusion of Nomad-Han(胡漢) agriculture appearing in Qimimyaoshu

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Qimimyaoshu is valued as a book which has compiled in itself all the agricultural textbooks of ancient China. The compilation of agricultural textbooks represent that the compilation of agricultural techniques and agricultural skills have been compiled altogether. The remarkable thing is why the agricultural textbooks like those have been written in Houwei dynasty, the northern kingdom of the middle of 6th century. Huwei was a dynasty in which the cultures of Nomad and han were coexisting, in that it itself had succeeded to the orthodox dysnasty of Northern Wei. In that point it can be expected that Qimimyaoshu, a agricultural textbook published at that time, would also be containing much of Nomad-han culture, well supported by the fact that the textbook shows evidences of valuing pasturage and various local products which are not produced in China, to say nothing of the fermented food like doenjang. Usually the existing studies on Qimimyaoshu had been done from the view of the dissemination of dry-field farming. Recently, with the study outcome that the fusion policy of Nomad-han in Weijin age has a close relationship with the capacity and internationality of the Suitang culture, the agricultural historical understanding suffered a change too. If Qimimyaoshu is a agricultural textbook published being based on the circumstances of the coexistence of Nomad-han in The Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, it brought, going through the Suitang dynasties and taking advantage of the dissemination of the Chinese character culture and the political and military power, a new change to the established agriculture and dietary culture of China, and again to those of minority races. So every country came to reinforced the traditional agricultural techniques of locality, and Qimimyaoshu came to be widely applied across the dynasties and regions, presented itself as a good example for agricultural textbook to each dynasty being also applied to the rice farming method, which altogether formed the reason for the lasting survival power of Qimimyaoshu. From this point of view Qimimyaoshu can be taken as a agricultural textbook created by the minority races around at the same time also, rather than by the Huabei(華北) people solely and simply, and its another feature is that it brought a new situation to the agriculture of East Asia with its repeated dissemination to every area after publication. Especially Qimimyaoshu introduces about 150 kinds of local products outside China, beyond the traditional life zone of Han race in the middlestream and downstream of the Yellow River. Of course the number of overlapping items is not small, but they are all raising crops or wild plants which came from the regions of minority race, and some crops have the character "胡"(Nomad) as the first letter of their names, making evident that they came from the minority races of the western and northern areas. Additionally, the breeds of cattle and the secondary agricultural process method by them appearing in Qimimyaoshu shows that Qimimyaoshu was born as a agricultural encyclopedia which covers various cultural backgrounds and made the agriculture of Nomad-han be merged into “元一體”(the unification of the plurals) and be settled as the agriculture of the midlands. In other words, Qimimyaoshu came to be seen again from a certain point of view of cultural history that the local interchange of industry and culture through the publication of Qimimyaoshu newly create local cultures. This thesis examined the real state of the raising crops of the Huabei region by investigating the agricultural skills of the inland, together with the animals and plants and their other names of the outside world by investigating again every kind of the literature which had actually been referred to, finding as its outcome the trace that there were efforts to actively introduce and import the local products from the outside in The Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties. Hence its rooting in the Huabei region of different ecological circumstances, and its modification of the conditions of “天地人”(the Sky, the Land, and Nomad-man beings) for the mutual combination. It was just because of the capacity of agricultural textbooks like that, that Qimimyaoshu came to be widely applied all across the East Asian countries afterward and it was because of Nomad-han's fusional character Qimimyaoshu had, that the countries around could also write agricultural textbooks on its basis. On this point it can be asserted that Qimimyaoshu shows the way of communication between cultures from the angle of economy as well as the political fusion of Nomad-han. It even makes possible the agricultural historical proving of the political and economic problems of the formation of East Asian cultures.

Abstract

Qimimyaoshu is valued as a book which has compiled in itself all the agricultural textbooks of ancient China. The compilation of agricultural textbooks represent that the compilation of agricultural techniques and agricultural skills have been compiled altogether. The remarkable thing is why the agricultural textbooks like those have been written in Houwei dynasty, the northern kingdom of the middle of 6th century. Huwei was a dynasty in which the cultures of Nomad and han were coexisting, in that it itself had succeeded to the orthodox dysnasty of Northern Wei. In that point it can be expected that Qimimyaoshu, a agricultural textbook published at that time, would also be containing much of Nomad-han culture, well supported by the fact that the textbook shows evidences of valuing pasturage and various local products which are not produced in China, to say nothing of the fermented food like doenjang. Usually the existing studies on Qimimyaoshu had been done from the view of the dissemination of dry-field farming. Recently, with the study outcome that the fusion policy of Nomad-han in Weijin age has a close relationship with the capacity and internationality of the Suitang culture, the agricultural historical understanding suffered a change too. If Qimimyaoshu is a agricultural textbook published being based on the circumstances of the coexistence of Nomad-han in The Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, it brought, going through the Suitang dynasties and taking advantage of the dissemination of the Chinese character culture and the political and military power, a new change to the established agriculture and dietary culture of China, and again to those of minority races. So every country came to reinforced the traditional agricultural techniques of locality, and Qimimyaoshu came to be widely applied across the dynasties and regions, presented itself as a good example for agricultural textbook to each dynasty being also applied to the rice farming method, which altogether formed the reason for the lasting survival power of Qimimyaoshu. From this point of view Qimimyaoshu can be taken as a agricultural textbook created by the minority races around at the same time also, rather than by the Huabei(華北) people solely and simply, and its another feature is that it brought a new situation to the agriculture of East Asia with its repeated dissemination to every area after publication. Especially Qimimyaoshu introduces about 150 kinds of local products outside China, beyond the traditional life zone of Han race in the middlestream and downstream of the Yellow River. Of course the number of overlapping items is not small, but they are all raising crops or wild plants which came from the regions of minority race, and some crops have the character "胡"(Nomad) as the first letter of their names, making evident that they came from the minority races of the western and northern areas. Additionally, the breeds of cattle and the secondary agricultural process method by them appearing in Qimimyaoshu shows that Qimimyaoshu was born as a agricultural encyclopedia which covers various cultural backgrounds and made the agriculture of Nomad-han be merged into “元一體”(the unification of the plurals) and be settled as the agriculture of the midlands. In other words, Qimimyaoshu came to be seen again from a certain point of view of cultural history that the local interchange of industry and culture through the publication of Qimimyaoshu newly create local cultures. This thesis examined the real state of the raising crops of the Huabei region by investigating the agricultural skills of the inland, together with the animals and plants and their other names of the outside world by investigating again every kind of the literature which had actually been referred to, finding as its outcome the trace that there were efforts to actively introduce and import the local products from the outside in The Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties. Hence its rooting in the Huabei region of different ecological circumstances, and its modification of the conditions of “天地人”(the Sky, the Land, and Nomad-man beings) for the mutual combination. It was just because of the capacity of agricultural textbooks like that, that Qimimyaoshu came to be widely applied all across the East Asian countries afterward and it was because of Nomad-han's fusional character Qimimyaoshu had, that the countries around could also write agricultural textbooks on its basis. On this point it can be asserted that Qimimyaoshu shows the way of communication between cultures from the angle of economy as well as the political fusion of Nomad-han. It even makes possible the agricultural historical proving of the political and economic problems of the formation of East Asian cultures.

참고문헌 (67)

  1. 繆啓愉, "齊民要術校釋" (1998), 中國農業出版社
  2. 李根蟠, "從『齊民要術』看少數民族對中國科技文化發展的貢獻-『齊民要術』硏究的一個新視角", 中國農史, 21(2) (2002)
  3. 石聲漢, "中國古代農書評介", pp.23~ (1980), 農業出版社
  4. 楊九龍, "『齊民要術』農學體系構造硏究", 西北農林科技大學學報, 7(3) (2007)
  5. 崔德卿, "中國의 大豆 加工食品史에 대한 一考察", 중국사연구, 25, pp.63~86 (2003), 중국사학회
  6. 최덕경, "大豆의 기원과 醬․ 및 豆腐의 보급에 대한 재검토-중국고대 文獻과 그 出土자료를 중심으로-", 역사민속학, (30), pp.363~427 (2009), 한국역사민속학회
  7. "晉書", ~
  8. "洛陽伽藍記", ~
  9. 辛樹幟, "中國果樹史硏究" (1983), 農業出版社
  10. 崔德卿, "齊民要術의 高麗豆普及과 韓半島의 農作法에 대한 一考察", 東洋史學硏究, 78 (2002), 東洋史學會
  11. 竺可禎, "中國近五千年來氣候變遷的初步硏究", 考古學報, 1 (1972)
  12. "通典", ~
  13. 晉嵇含, "『南方草木狀』 卷下" (1985), 中華書局
  14. "初學記", ~
  15. 文煥然, "中國歷史時期植物與動物變遷硏究" (2006), 重慶出版社
  16. "文選", ~
  17. "上林賦", ~
  18. "逸周書", ~
  19. "西京雜記", ~
  20. 劉昭民, "中國歷史上氣候之變遷", pp.81~ (1992), 臺灣商務印書館
  21. 中國植物學會, "中國植物學史" (1994), 科學出版社
  22. 유소민, "기후의 반역" (2005), 성균관대학교 출판부
  23. 方旅人, "秦漢ㆍ三國ㆍ晉ㆍ南北朝柑桔史考", 農業考古, 2 (1989)
  24. 黃壽波, "我國古代柑桔凍害的防禦方法", 農業考古, 2 (1989)
  25. "氾勝之書", ~
  26. "齊民要術今釋", ~
  27. 石聲漢, "齊民要術今釋(第二分冊)", pp.237~ (1957), 科學出版社
  28. 繆啓愉, "齊民要術今釋(第二版)", pp.268~271 (1998), 中國農業出版社
  29. "鹽鐵論", ~
  30. "禮記", ~
  31. "孟子", ~
  32. 崔德卿, "戰國․秦漢시대 음식물의 材料", 考古歷史學志, 11, pp.122~123 (1996)
  33. 夏亨廉, "漢代農業畵像磚石" (1996), 中國農業出版社
  34. 張壽祺, "東漢時期南方地區家畜的飼養 in: 中國畜牧史料集", pp.58~60 (1986)
  35. 張波, "中國農業通史-戰國ㆍ秦漢卷" (2007), 中國農業出版社
  36. "隋書", ~
  37. "北史", ~
  38. "魏書", ~
  39. 王利華, "中古時期北方地區畜牧業的變動", 中國經濟史論壇 (2003)
  40. 謝成俠, "中國養牛羊史", pp.161~ (1985), 農業出版社
  41. 小林淸市, "『齊民要術』のなかの家畜の病(中國博物學の歷史-南方草木狀,齊民要術を中心に-)" (2003), 農山漁村文化協會
  42. 李根蟠, "胡化的餐卓", 未發表論文
  43. "釋名", ~
  44. 樊志民, "中國古代北方飮食文化特色硏究 in: 問稼軒農史文集" (2006), 西北農林科技大學出版社
  45. "周禮", ~
  46. 石毛直道, "魚醬과 食醢의 硏究", pp.15~16 (1995), 修學社
  47. "四民月令", ~
  48. 楊堅, "『齊民要術』所記載的肉食加工與烹飪方法初探", 中國農史 (2004)
  49. "晋書", ~
  50. 蔣福亞, "齊民要術所見農民和市場的關係", 首都師範大學學報, 2 (2002)
  51. 樊樹志, "國史十六講" (2006), 中華書局
  52. 孫一慰, "『齊民要術』部分飮食品溯源", 揚州大學烹飪學報 (2004)
  53. "後漢書", ~
  54. "資治通鑑", ~
  55. 遼寧博物館, "朝陽袁臺子東晉壁畵墓", 文物 (1984)
  56. 李泳集, "從考古發現看鮮卑族農業", 農業考古 (1991)
  57. 金秉駿, "古代中國의 西方전래문물과 崑崙山神話" (2001), 지식산업사
  58. 田立坤, "靑果集", pp.339~340 (1998), 知識出版社
  59. 朱學淵, "中國北方諸族的源流" (2002), 中華書局
  60. 耿鐵華, "高句麗漁獵經濟初探", 博物館硏究 (1986)
  61. 劉景文, "古夫餘農牧業探索 in: 中國考古集成", 北京出版社
  62. 馬大正, "古代中國高句麗歷史叢論", pp.66~68 (2001), 黑龍江敎育出版社
  63. 王玲, "魏晋北朝時期內遷胡族的農業化與胡漢飮食交流", 中國農史, 4 (2003)
  64. 樊寶敏, "中國森林生態史引論" (2008), 科學出版社
  65. 路兆豊, "中國古代農書的經濟思想" (1991), 新華出版社
  66. 崔德卿, "漢代遼東犁和其作畝法 in: 中國農史" (2006), 中國農業出版社
  67. 李根蟠, "陳旉農書與三才理論-與齊民要術比較(社會科學版)", 華南農業大學學報 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)