본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

西周時期 北京地域 政治體-周初 中原 勢力의 北京 進入과 衝突-

Political States of Beijing Region in Xizhou(西周) Period- Entrance and Collision of Central District at Beijing in the Beginning Era of Xihou Period -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The political circumstance of political power changes in Shang and Xiahou Periods was that the political powers had been being restructured in the Central District and had been expended to other regions. In the Beginning Era of Xihou Period, Yan State(燕), one of the powers in the Central District, entered around the center of the Yongding river(永定河) at Beijing region from its southern part. In the northern part, one of the powers had been existing already around the center of the grave of Baifu in Changping(昌平 白浮墓). Around the center of the ruins of Liulihe(琉璃河), Yan State was occupying its political power as a settler by conquering or merging the people of losing Shang's State. The main power of the grave of Baifu is unknown, however, it is certain that the power was not one of the native powers in Beijing region. In the process of the violent political changes in the end of Shang Period and the beginning of Xizhou (商末周初) period, the power of the people of losing Shang's State were entered into the Beijing region as a result of the process or proceeded into the region in the form of Yan's feudal system. In this process, the groups of the Shang's people were merged into the Yan as nobles by assisting Yan State or were moved forcibly further into the northern area of the region by Yan State. In addition, the representative native power of the Zhangjiayuan Shangceng Culture(張家園上層文化) was existing until Chunqiu period around the areas of the region, except the districts governed by Yan State. The areas of distribution for Jiyan Culture(姬燕文化) representing the culture of Central District in Beijing region include only the southern part of the Yongding river(永定河) and the area around the Yishui(易水), but the Zhangjiayuan Shangceng Culture of the native power was distributed widely over the areas of Beijing region and Yan mountains. In other side, it appears that there coexisted both Jiyan Culture and Zhangjiayuan Shangceng Culture in the areas influenced by Yan State, except Yan's capital city. It indicates the process of both the coexistence and the collision of two cultures in the region. From the distributions, it can be assumed that, even though the powers of Central District and their culture were entered into the areas around Beijing region and Yan mountains by Yan State, they were not widely expanded over the areas, but mainly remained in their capital city, due to the native power of the Zhangjiayuan Shangceng Culture in the region and the mountains.

Abstract

The political circumstance of political power changes in Shang and Xiahou Periods was that the political powers had been being restructured in the Central District and had been expended to other regions. In the Beginning Era of Xihou Period, Yan State(燕), one of the powers in the Central District, entered around the center of the Yongding river(永定河) at Beijing region from its southern part. In the northern part, one of the powers had been existing already around the center of the grave of Baifu in Changping(昌平 白浮墓). Around the center of the ruins of Liulihe(琉璃河), Yan State was occupying its political power as a settler by conquering or merging the people of losing Shang's State. The main power of the grave of Baifu is unknown, however, it is certain that the power was not one of the native powers in Beijing region. In the process of the violent political changes in the end of Shang Period and the beginning of Xizhou (商末周初) period, the power of the people of losing Shang's State were entered into the Beijing region as a result of the process or proceeded into the region in the form of Yan's feudal system. In this process, the groups of the Shang's people were merged into the Yan as nobles by assisting Yan State or were moved forcibly further into the northern area of the region by Yan State. In addition, the representative native power of the Zhangjiayuan Shangceng Culture(張家園上層文化) was existing until Chunqiu period around the areas of the region, except the districts governed by Yan State. The areas of distribution for Jiyan Culture(姬燕文化) representing the culture of Central District in Beijing region include only the southern part of the Yongding river(永定河) and the area around the Yishui(易水), but the Zhangjiayuan Shangceng Culture of the native power was distributed widely over the areas of Beijing region and Yan mountains. In other side, it appears that there coexisted both Jiyan Culture and Zhangjiayuan Shangceng Culture in the areas influenced by Yan State, except Yan's capital city. It indicates the process of both the coexistence and the collision of two cultures in the region. From the distributions, it can be assumed that, even though the powers of Central District and their culture were entered into the areas around Beijing region and Yan mountains by Yan State, they were not widely expanded over the areas, but mainly remained in their capital city, due to the native power of the Zhangjiayuan Shangceng Culture in the region and the mountains.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. 중국사연구, "갑골‐금문으로 본 상대 북경지역 정치체", 중국사연구, 47 (2007)
  2. 陳光, "燕文化硏究論文集" (1995), 中國社會科學出版社
  3. "北京建城3040年曁燕文明國際學術硏討會會議專輯" (1997), 北京市文物硏究所, 北京燕山出版社
  4. 陳平, "燕事紀事編年會按" (1995), 北京大學出版社
  5. 陳平, "燕文化" (2006), 文物出版社
  6. 陳平, "北京文博, In 北京文物與考古", 北京市文物局
  7. 郭大順, "東北文化與幽燕文明" (2005), 江蘇敎育出版社
  8. 北京市文物硏究所, "琉璃河西周燕國墓地,1973-1977" (1995), 文物出版社
  9. 北京市文物工作隊, "北京房山縣考古調査簡報", 考古, (3) (1963)
  10. 中國社會科學院考古硏究所, "1981-1983年琉璃河西周燕國墓地發掘簡報", 考古, (5) (1984)
  11. 中國社會科學院考古硏究所, "北京琉璃河1193號大墓發掘簡報", 考古, (1) (1990)
  12. 北京市文物硏究所, "1995年琉璃河遺址墓葬區發掘簡報", 文物, (6) (1996)
  13. 北京大學考古學系‧, "1995年琉璃河周代居地發掘簡報", 文物, (6) (1996)
  14. 北京市文物硏究所, "北京房山琉璃河遺址發掘的商代遺跡", 文物, (4) (1997)
  15. 琉璃河考古隊, "琉璃河遺址1996年度發掘簡報", 文物, (6) (1997)
  16. 배진영, "西周 前期 燕國의 成立과 姬燕文化의 形成", 東洋史學硏究, 73 (2001)
  17. 陳平, "克罍,克盉銘文及其有關問題, In 燕文化硏究論文集"
  18. 方述鑫, "太保罍, 盉銘文考釋, In 燕文化硏究論文集", pp.288~
  19. 張亞初, "太保罍, 盉銘文的再探討, In 燕文化硏究論文集", pp.296~
  20. 殷瑋璋, "周初太保器綜合硏究, In 燕文化硏究論文集", pp.239~
  21. 孫華, "匽侯克器銘文淺見-兼談召公建燕及其相關問題, In 燕文化硏究論文集"
  22. 杜迺松, "克罍克盉銘文新釋", 古宮博物院院刊, (1), pp.63~ (1998)
  23. "尙書「君奭 序」", ~
  24. 殷瑋璋, "新出土的太保銅器及其相關問題, In 燕文化硏究論文集", pp.254~264
  25. 張劍, "論西周燕國殷遺民的政治地位", 北京建城3040年曁燕文明國際學術硏討會會議專輯
  26. "殷周金文集成", ~
  27. 張亞初, "燕國靑銅器銘文硏究", ~
  28. 陳平, "克器事燕六族會釋考證", 北京建城3040年曁燕文明國際學術硏討會會議專輯
  29. "史記 卷4 「周本紀」", ~
  30. 白川靜, "金文の世界-殷周社會史", pp.80~81 (1971), 平凡社
  31. 李成珪, "先秦文獻에 보이는 ‘東夷’의 性格", 韓國古代史論叢, 1, pp.140~ (1991)
  32. "左傳 卷27 定公 四年", ~
  33. 北京市文物硏究所, "琉璃河西周燕國墓地, 1973-1977", ~
  34. 曹淑琴, "伯矩銅器群及其相關問題, In 燕文化硏究論文集", pp.204~
  35. 鄭紹宗, "商周金文和河北古代方國硏究, In 河洛文明論文集", pp.237~ (1993), 中州古籍出版社
  36. 河北省博物館, "河北藁城縣臺西村商代遺址-1973年的重要發現-", 文物 (1974)
  37. 河北省文物硏究所, "定州北莊子商墓發掘簡報", 文物春秋 (1992)
  38. 王宇信, "史記‘封召公奭于燕’的武王爲宏見‘武王(時期)’說", 北京建城3040年曁燕文明國際學術硏討會會議專輯, pp.84~
  39. 陳恩林, "論魯‧齊‧燕的侍奉及燕與邶國關係", 北京建城3040年曁燕文明國際學術硏討會會議專輯, pp.106~
  40. "逸周書「作雒」", ~
  41. 北京市文物管理處, "北京地區的又一考古收穫-昌平白浮西周木槨墓的啓示", 考古, (4) (1976)
  42. 北京大學歷史系考古硏究室商周組, "商周考古", pp.199~200 (1979), 文物出版社
  43. 張長壽, "西周墓葬的分區硏究, In 新中國的考古發現和硏究", pp.261~ (1984), 文物出版社
  44. 李維明, "北京昌平白浮墓地分析", 北京文博 (2000)
  45. "禮記 19 「樂記」", ~
  46. "漢書 卷28 「地理志」", ~
  47. "水經注 卷13 「漯水注」", ~
  48. 韓嘉谷, "論北京地區爲‘其’國(族)故地", 北京文博, (1), pp.32~34 (1995)
  49. 韓嘉谷, "燕史原流的考古學考察, In 燕文化硏究論文集"
  50. 唐雲明, "河北境內幾處商代文化遺存記略, In 考古學集刊(2)", pp.44~46 (1982), 中國社會科學出版社
  51. 北京市文物硏究所, "北京市考古五十年, In 新中國考古五十年", pp.8~ (1999), 文物出版社
  52. 北京市文物管理處, "北京市平谷縣發現商代墓葬", 文物, (11) (1977)
  53. 北京市文物工作隊, "北京平谷劉家河遺址調査, In 北京文物與考古(第三輯)" (1992), 北京燕山出版社
  54. 北京市平谷區文化委員會, "平谷文物志" (2005), 民族出版社
  55. 李伯謙, "張家園上層類型若干問題硏究, In 中國靑銅文化結構體系硏究", pp.152~ (1998), 科學出版社
  56. 北京市文物硏究所, "平谷龍坡遺址發掘刊報, In 北京文物與考古 6集", pp.21~ (2004), 民族出版社
  57. 北京市文物硏究所, "北京市昌平區張營遺址的發掘及其意義", 內蒙古文物考古, (2) (2006)
  58. 李子春, "河北豊潤盧各莊出土商代銅鼎", 文物, (4) (2007)
  59. 河北省文物硏究所‧段宏振, "北福地-易水流域史前遺址" (2006), 文物出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)