关于中韩海域划界问题解决方案的思考
Reflections on the Solution of China-South Korea Sea Boundary Delimitation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
国际海域划界动态的分析可以帮助理清目前海洋划界发展趋势,为中韩 两国提供理论和实践指导。具体来说,内容可包含中韩海域划界的主要争议问题, 即中韩两国在划界步骤和划界方法上的分歧及原因、划定单一边界是否可行、影响 中韩海域划界的地理性因素(海岸线、地质地貌、岛屿)和非地理性因素(社会经 济、安全航行、生态环境)在中韩划界中的效力等。在对上述问题进行综合评估 后,笔者提出: 中韩海域划界可先寻求在200海里以内、在中韩海域争端比较突出 的渔业纠纷、苏岩礁问题及海洋生态环境问题上作出临时安排; 然后通过三步划界 法,即首先根据地理性因素,划定一条临时界线; 之后依据地质地貌因素和非地理 因素等相关情况进行具体调整; 最后按照比例进行检视并最终完成划界,以此实现 中韩海域界限既能便于两国海域管辖又能兼顾公平原则。对于200海里外东海大陆 架划界问题,因牵扯中日韩三方利益与关切,则需另行方案商讨解决。
Abstract
The analysis of the dynamics of international maritime delimitation can help clarify the current development trend of maritime delimitation and provide theoretical and practical guidance for China and South Korea. Specifically, the content can include the main controversial issues of maritime delimitation between China and Korea, i.e., the differences between China and Korea on the delimitation steps and delimitation methods and their reasons, the feasibility of delimiting a single boundary, and the effectiveness of geographic factors (coastline, geological features, islands) and non-geographic factors (socio-economic, safety navigation, ecological environment) affecting the delimitation of maritime areas between China and Korea in the delimitation between China and Korea. After a comprehensive assessment of the above issues, the author proposes that: the delimitation of the sea area between China and South Korea can first seek to make provisional arrangements within 200 nautical miles, in the fishery disputes, the Suyan Reef issue and the marine ecological environment, which are more prominent in the disputes between China and South Korea; then, through a three-step delimitation method, i.e., firstly, a provisional boundary line is drawn based on geological and rational factors; afterwards, relevant circumstances such as geological and geomorphological factors and non-geographical factors are Finally, the delimitation will be reviewed and finalized in accordance with the proportion, so that the maritime boundary between China and South Korea can be easily and equitably delimited by both countries. As for the delimitation of the continental shelf in the East China Sea beyond 200 nautical miles, the interests and concerns of three parties, China, Japan and South Korea, are involved, s o a separate solution is needed.
참고문헌 (15)
- 曹玮, "韩国在争议海区“抢先下手”有失公平原则-从国际法角度评析韩国‘作为.’", 太平洋学报, (3) (2012)
- 傅崐成, "中国周边大陆架的划界方法与问题", 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), (3) (2014)
- 黄瑶, "国际海洋划界司法实践的新动向-2012年孟加拉湾划界案评析", 法学, (12) (2012)
- 孙传香, "国际海洋划界三阶段理论: 形成、实践与检视", 法学评论, (6) (2016)
- 史久镛, "国际法院判例中的海洋划界", 法治研究, (12) (2011)
- 张华, "国际司法裁决中的海洋划界方法论解析", 外交评论, (6) (2012)
- 张新军, "中日东海争端中自然延伸原则的重要地位——基于权利和划界规则之间关系的视角", 政法论坛, (2) (2006)
- 강효백, "WTO무역관련투자조치 협정과 중국의 외국인투자법제에 관한 연구", 한국동북아논총, 9(30), pp.27~52 (2004), 한국동북아학회
- 金荣球, "从海洋法角度看苏岩礁问题的解决方案", 东北亚历史财团研究报告, 22(2) (2008)
- 金荣球, "中韩间海洋划界的法律标准考察", 国际法学会论集, 42(1) (1997)
- 양희철, "통킹만 경계획정을 통해본 중국의 해양경계획정 정책 및 우리나라 대응방안에 관한 연구", Ocean and Polar Research, 29(3), pp.245~262 (2007), 한국해양과학기술원
- 양희철, "한중 황해 해양경계획정에서의 고려요소와대응방안에 관한 연구", 국제법학회논총, 57(3), pp.107~150 (2012), 대한국제법학회
- 李东垣, "中国的海洋法形成过程及海洋划界研究", 国际法学会论丛, 52(1) (2007)
- 崔洪培, "ICJ关于北海大陆架划界案的判例研究", 海事法研究, 12(1) (2000)
- 江藤淳一, "有关海洋划界的国际判例的动向", 国际法研究, (1) (2019)
