대한제국기 서구식 소례복 연구
A Study on the Western-style Soryebok during the Daehan Empire
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine the western-style Soryebok (men’s formal wear), which was introduced during the Daehan Empire. This study analyzed historical documents, artifacts, and photos, along with the Japanese Tongsangyebok(Soryebok). The swallow-tail coat and the frock coat were known as western-style Soryebok. In the western society, morning coats were worn more often than the frock coats after 1900. During the introduction of the Soryebok, the Daehan Empire and The Meiji government had to experience the difficulty in learning the dress etiquettes, while getting acquainted with the dress components as well. The Meiji government defined the swallow-tail coat as Tongsangyebok in 1872. Though frock coats were allowed to be worn as a swallow-tail substitute initially, it gradually settled as a Tongsangbok (men’s general wear). The many etiquette books were published, and it played an important role in teaching people about the various types and wearing manners of men’s wear. These books emphasized that wearing a frock coat as a substitute of swallow-tail coat should be avoided. The Daehan Empire accepted the swallow-tail coat as Soryebok in the 14th Imperial order in April 17th 1900. On January 16th, 1905, a revision was made in the official gazette, which divided the Soryebok into the swallow-tail coat and the frock coat. The Soryebok could be worn by civil servants, and was composed of a silk hat, coat, vest, slacks, and shoes. It had to be worn in accordance with proper wearing occasions. The Soryebok could be worn as a court dress substitute for those who couldn’t prepare court dresses. And the Soryebok was to be worn while attending a western-style ceremony and banquet. The wearing of swallow-tail coats or frock coats depended on the banquet. The artifacts in the museum collection are 1 frock coat and 8 morning coats, while there was no report of swallow-tail coats. It can be regarded that the division of the Soryebok rule during the Daehan Empire was due to the process of solving the problems of understanding wearing manners after the introduction of men’s formal wear
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the western-style Soryebok (men’s formal wear), which was introduced during the Daehan Empire. This study analyzed historical documents, artifacts, and photos, along with the Japanese Tongsangyebok(Soryebok). The swallow-tail coat and the frock coat were known as western-style Soryebok. In the western society, morning coats were worn more often than the frock coats after 1900. During the introduction of the Soryebok, the Daehan Empire and The Meiji government had to experience the difficulty in learning the dress etiquettes, while getting acquainted with the dress components as well. The Meiji government defined the swallow-tail coat as Tongsangyebok in 1872. Though frock coats were allowed to be worn as a swallow-tail substitute initially, it gradually settled as a Tongsangbok (men’s general wear). The many etiquette books were published, and it played an important role in teaching people about the various types and wearing manners of men’s wear. These books emphasized that wearing a frock coat as a substitute of swallow-tail coat should be avoided. The Daehan Empire accepted the swallow-tail coat as Soryebok in the 14th Imperial order in April 17th 1900. On January 16th, 1905, a revision was made in the official gazette, which divided the Soryebok into the swallow-tail coat and the frock coat. The Soryebok could be worn by civil servants, and was composed of a silk hat, coat, vest, slacks, and shoes. It had to be worn in accordance with proper wearing occasions. The Soryebok could be worn as a court dress substitute for those who couldn’t prepare court dresses. And the Soryebok was to be worn while attending a western-style ceremony and banquet. The wearing of swallow-tail coats or frock coats depended on the banquet. The artifacts in the museum collection are 1 frock coat and 8 morning coats, while there was no report of swallow-tail coats. It can be regarded that the division of the Soryebok rule during the Daehan Empire was due to the process of solving the problems of understanding wearing manners after the introduction of men’s formal wear
참고문헌 (36)
- 이경미, "제복의 탄생-대한제국 서구식 대례복의 성립과 변천" (2012), 민속원
- 이경미, "대한제국 1900년(光武4) 문관대례복 제도와 무궁화 문양의 상징성", 복식, 60(3), pp.123~137 (2010), 한국복식학회
- 이경미, "개항기 전통식 소례복 연구", 복식, 64(4), pp.162~175 (2014), 한국복식학회[DOI]
- Maria Constantino, "Men’s Fashion in the Twentieth Century from Frock Coats to Intelligent Fibres, N", pp.6~ (1997), Costume & Fashion Press
- 고애란, "서양의 복식문화와 역사", pp.300~301 (2007), 교문사
- R. I. Davis, "Men’s Garments 1830-1900 A guide to pattern cutting and tailoring", pp.14~28 (1994), Players press Inc
- 정흥숙, "서양복식문화사", pp.306~307 (2005), 敎文社
- Richard Martin, "A History of Men’s Fashion", pp.122~ (1993), Flammarion
- Lillian Eichler, "Book of Etiquette V2", pp.148~ (1921), Nelson Doubledaym TNC, Kessinger Legacy
- 文化服飾博物館, "近代 洋裝-日本 西洋-", pp.12~ (1983), 壯光舍印刷株式會社
- "朝鮮特派美國全權公使 로우"[URL]
- 홍사중, "상투 틀고 미국에 가다", pp.105~ (1983), 弘盛社
- "사진으로 보는 독립운동 上", pp.23~ (1987), 서문당
- "韓末 美公使 후트와 그의 부인 및 직원일동"[URL]
- "알렌 夫妻"[URL]
- 이경미, "개항이후 대한제국 성립 이전 외교관 복식 연구", 한국문화, (63), pp.129~159 (2013), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 김원모, "사진으로 보는 백년 전의 한국", pp.36~ (1997), 가톨릭 출판사
- 고려대학교박물관, "(한불수교 120주년)서울의 추억 : 한불 1886-1905", pp.160~ (2006), 고려대학교 박물관
- 內閣官報局, "明治5年法令全書, 11月 12일 太政官339號", 博聞社, ~ (1889)
- "法令全書 明治 10年 9月 19日 太政官 第65號(布)"[URL]
- "法令全書 明治 10年 12月 12日 無號"[URL]
- "禮儀作法"[URL]
- "內外交際新禮式", pp.75~79 (1899), 民友社
- 峰是三郎, "禮義作法のあやまり", pp.34~40 (1901), 成美堂
- 校友會, "日常禮儀作法綱要", pp.19~ (1927), 日本印刷製本株式會社
- 小山直子, "フロックコートと羽織袴-禮裝規範の形成と近代日本", pp.73~161 (2016), 勁草西房
- "舊韓國官報"[URL]
- "中樞院來文 9책(규 17788)" (1907)[URL]
- "舊韓國官報" (1907)[URL]
- "皇城新聞"[URL]
- "雜報禮式節次와 日菊磨王의 稱慶祝典參席通報에 대한 致謝 및同禮式節目 送呈" (1903)[URL]
- "大韓每日申報" (1909)[URL]
- "每日申報" (1926)[URL]
- 국립현대미술관, "대한제국 황실의 초상1880-1989", pp.157~ (2012), 그래픽코리아
- 최은주, "대한제국기 프록코트의 형태와 제작법에 관한 연구 -박기종 유물 조사를 중심으로-", 복식문화연구, 23(3), pp.439~453 (2015), 복식문화학회[DOI]
- 경기여고 경운박물관, "대한제국 남성예복 : 새로운 물결, 주체적 수용", 디자인이즈, 41~ (2012)
