장형 부정 구문의 격 교체에 대한 재고찰
The Case Alternations in the Long-form Negation Construction Revisited
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Many Studies have been done to explain the Case alternation in the Korean long-form negation construction (hereafter, LNC). In Yang (1995, 1996) and K. Lee (2002), 'anh-' is reanalyzed into 'ani ha-' and 'ha-' as a head is supposed to have property to license an accusative case to '-ci' in the LNC optionally. However, some problems occur with their analyses, due to the optional property of 'ha-'. In order to overcome the problem, Choi (2006) suggests base-generated X0-adjunction structures for the LNC in which 'ha-' is treated not as a head but a part of 'anh-'. Under the structures and Chomsky's (2000, 2001) Agree system, he explains the Case alternation in the LNC, using Case minimality and c-command suggested by Kayne (1994) and postulating 'anh-' as an accusative licensor. However, there seems to be a problem in his explanation of the Case alternation in the LNC through 'minimality'. In this paper, we take Choi's structures for the LNC, his postulation that 'anh-' can be a case licensor and the concept of the phase suggested by Chomsky (2005) and show an alternative for the Case alternation in the LNC. The LNC containing a transitive verb or an unergative verb as its predicate has two phases, namely, v*P and CP while the LNC containing an adjective or an ergative verb as its predicate has only one phase, namely, CP. In the former case, only accusative Case can be licensed within the v*P phase because the phase is the domain of accusative Case and 'anh-' is an accusative Case licensor. On the other hand, in the latter case, both nominative and accusative Cases can be licensed within the CP phase because the phase is the domain of nominative Case and 'anh-' is the accusative Case licensor.
Abstract
Many Studies have been done to explain the Case alternation in the Korean long-form negation construction (hereafter, LNC). In Yang (1995, 1996) and K. Lee (2002), 'anh-' is reanalyzed into 'ani ha-' and 'ha-' as a head is supposed to have property to license an accusative case to '-ci' in the LNC optionally. However, some problems occur with their analyses, due to the optional property of 'ha-'. In order to overcome the problem, Choi (2006) suggests base-generated X0-adjunction structures for the LNC in which 'ha-' is treated not as a head but a part of 'anh-'. Under the structures and Chomsky's (2000, 2001) Agree system, he explains the Case alternation in the LNC, using Case minimality and c-command suggested by Kayne (1994) and postulating 'anh-' as an accusative licensor. However, there seems to be a problem in his explanation of the Case alternation in the LNC through 'minimality'. In this paper, we take Choi's structures for the LNC, his postulation that 'anh-' can be a case licensor and the concept of the phase suggested by Chomsky (2005) and show an alternative for the Case alternation in the LNC. The LNC containing a transitive verb or an unergative verb as its predicate has two phases, namely, v*P and CP while the LNC containing an adjective or an ergative verb as its predicate has only one phase, namely, CP. In the former case, only accusative Case can be licensed within the v*P phase because the phase is the domain of accusative Case and 'anh-' is an accusative Case licensor. On the other hand, in the latter case, both nominative and accusative Cases can be licensed within the CP phase because the phase is the domain of nominative Case and 'anh-' is the accusative Case licensor.
참고문헌 (34)
- 고광주, "국어의 능격성에 대한 검토.한국어학회편, 국어의 격과 조사", pp.867~891 (1999), 월인
- 고광주, "국어의 능격성 연구" (2001), 월인출판사
- 김선웅, "한국어 주격 목적어 연구", 언어, 21, pp.241~261 (1996)
- 김용하, "한국어의 어미체계와 격 인허에 대한 최소주의적 고찰", 국어학, 46, pp.295~329 (2005)
- 시정곤, "국어의 단어형성원리" (1994), 국학자료원
- 안희돈, "경동사 생략과 어휘의미구조", 현대문법연구, 47, pp.19~52 (2007)
- 양동휘, "최소주의 가설" (2003), 한국문화사
- 임홍빈, "국어의 부정법에 대하여", 국어생활, 10, pp.72~99 (1987)
- 임홍빈, "국어 굴절의 원리적 성격과 재구조화-‘교착소’와 ‘교착법‘의 설정을 제안하며", 관악어문연구, 22, pp.93~163 (1997)
- 임홍빈, "한국어 구문 분석의 원리와 방법", 한국언어학회 여름학술대회 (2003)
- 최기용, "한국어 장형부정구문의 구조", 생성문법연구, 3, pp.25~78 (1993)
- 주격교체, 의미구조와 통사구조, 그리고 그 너머, "소망구문에서의 대격", pp.2004, 최기용
- 최기용, "장형 부정 구문의 격 교체", 언어, 31, pp.441~461 (2006)
- 홍용철, "한국어의 부정구문", 생성문법연구, 8, pp.25~72 (1998)
- Choi,Kiyong, "A Theory of Syntactic X0-subcategorization", 박사, pp.1991
- Choi,Young-Seok, "Possessor Ascension and Lexical Passive", Studies in Modern grammar, 21, pp.73~86 (2000)
- Chomsky,Noam, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "Minimalist Inquiry:The Framework, Step by Step: Essay in Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "Derivation by Phase, Ken hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "On Phases" (2005), ms
- Halle, "On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relation", pp.53~109 (1993), MIT Press
- Kang,Yong-Se, "Korean syntax and universal grammar", 박사, pp.1986
- Kim,Young-joo, "Default nominative case in Korean", Studies in Modern grammar, 2, pp.113~148 (1991)
- Kayne,Richards, "Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kim,Soowon, "Syntactic case and Frequency Adverbiala?in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 5, pp.368~378 (1993)
- Lee,Jeong-Shik, "Case Alternation in Korean:Case Minimality", 박사, pp.1992
- Lee,Kwangho, "Verb Movement and Case Marking in Korean Negation Construction", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 6, pp.328~342 (1995)
- KwanghoLee, "An Agree-based Account of Case Marking in Korean Negation Constructions", 현대문법연구, 29(29), pp.67~79 (2002), 현대문법학회
- Kang,Myung-Yoon, "Topic in Korean Syntax:Phrase Structure,Variable Binding,and Movement", 박사, pp.1988
- Park, Sang Do, "Passive construction in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 9, pp.640~649 (2001)
- Radford,Andrew, "Minimalist Syntax:Exploring the Structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Yang,Dongwhee, "The Minimalist Program and the Structure of Korean, Minimalist Approaches to Syntax and Morphology" (1995), Hankuk Publishing Co
- Yang,Dongwhee, "The Korean Case Structure in the Minimalist Program", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 21, pp.139~189 (1996)
- Yoon James Hye-Suk, "Raising Specifiers:A Macroparametric Account of?Subject-to object Raising in Some Altaic Languages, Perspectives on Korean Case and Case Marking", pp.245~266 (2004), Taehaksa