본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

The Determinism Fallacy: Ambiguity of Interpretive Effects

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Yang, Dong-Whee. 2010. The Determinism Fallacy: Ambiguity of Interpretive Effects. Korean Journal of linguistics, 35-4, 969-988. This paper discusses the determinism fallacy of the probe-goal checking theory of movement (Chomsky 2000, 2001) with respect to ambiguity of interpretive effects and proposes an alternative theory of movement that overcomes the determinism fallacy, i.e., the non-deterministic theory of movement. This paper proposes and motivates a non-deterministic theory of movement based on the notion of edge feature (EF) (Chomsky 2008). It will be claimed that the theory of movement based on EF, i.e., the theory of unmarked vs. marked internal merge (IM), is free from the determinism fallacy of the deterministic probe-goal checking theory of movement. Unmarked IM is characterized as inducing a default semantic effect, called a "D-effect", which simply results from the optionality of the operation of unmarked IM itself (Fox 2000), whereas marked IM is characterized as inducing a marked semantic effect called a “Non-D-effect,” due to the lexical properties of the head inducing the marked IM and the phrase undergoing the marked IM---leading to a theory of non-determinism. (Seoul National University)

Abstract

Yang, Dong-Whee. 2010. The Determinism Fallacy: Ambiguity of Interpretive Effects. Korean Journal of linguistics, 35-4, 969-988. This paper discusses the determinism fallacy of the probe-goal checking theory of movement (Chomsky 2000, 2001) with respect to ambiguity of interpretive effects and proposes an alternative theory of movement that overcomes the determinism fallacy, i.e., the non-deterministic theory of movement. This paper proposes and motivates a non-deterministic theory of movement based on the notion of edge feature (EF) (Chomsky 2008). It will be claimed that the theory of movement based on EF, i.e., the theory of unmarked vs. marked internal merge (IM), is free from the determinism fallacy of the deterministic probe-goal checking theory of movement. Unmarked IM is characterized as inducing a default semantic effect, called a "D-effect", which simply results from the optionality of the operation of unmarked IM itself (Fox 2000), whereas marked IM is characterized as inducing a marked semantic effect called a “Non-D-effect,” due to the lexical properties of the head inducing the marked IM and the phrase undergoing the marked IM---leading to a theory of non-determinism. (Seoul National University)

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Boškovic,Željko, "On the locality and motivation of move and agree: an even more minimal theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.589~644 (2007)
  2. Chomsky,Noam, "Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  3. Chomsky,Noam, "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  4. Chomsky,Noam, "On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
  5. Chomsky, Noam, "The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
  6. Cinque,Gugliemo, "Adverbs and Functional Heads; A Cross-Linguistic Perspective" (1999), Oxford University Press
  7. Fox,Danny, "Economy and semantic interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
  8. Heck, F, "Successive cyclicity, long-distance superiority, and local optimization", WCCFL, 19, pp.218~231 (2000)
  9. Kang,Young Se, "Case licensing", Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, 5, pp.342~347 (1993)
  10. Lasnik,Howard, "Minimalist investigstions in linguistic theory" (2003), Routledge
  11. Marantz,Alec, "Case and licensing" (1991), MIT
  12. Neeleman,Ad, "Flexible Syntax" (1999), Kluwer Academic Publlishers
  13. Preminger,Omer, "Toxic syntax: yet another theory of syntactic movement" (2007), MIT
  14. Richards,Norvin, "Movement in language :interactions and architecture" (2001), Oxford University Press
  15. Richards,Norvin, "A distinctness condition on linearization" (2007), MIT
  16. Rizzi,Luigi, "On the form of chains: criterial positions and ECP effects. In WH-movement moving on", ~ (2006)
  17. Thráinsson,Höskuldur, "Object shift and scrambling. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory", ~ (2001)
  18. Yang, Dong-Whee, "Focus movements, distinctness condition, and intervention effects", Paper presented at The Third International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics, Harvard University (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)