본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Global Nature of the Interpretive Effects of Mer

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

It has been assumed that the interpretive effects of Merge are supposedto be captured in terms of some local context of a Merging operation. Inthis paper it is claimed that the interpretive effects of Merge should becaptured not only syntactically or morphologically but alsophonologically or semantically (functionally as well) in terms of non‐determinism proposed in Yang (2013). According to non‐determinism, Ipropose there should be recognized three types of interpretive effects interms of LF and PF effects: (a) LF‐PF Interpretive Effect, (b) PF‐onlyInterpretive Effect, and (c) LF‐only Interpretive Effect. For the theory ofthree types of interpretive effects according to non‐determinism, it isnaturally assumed that the notion of edge feature (EF) of Chomsky(2008) has to be eliminated (Yang 2013). Hence, my non‐deterministictheory of interpretive effects works with the null hypothesis of Merge asproposed in Yang (2013). Given the null hypothesis of Merge for theinterpretive effects of Merge, ambiguity or multiplicity of the interpretiveeffects per Merge may be systematically captured. At the same time, amovement theory based on free Merge along with proper interpretiveeffects is suggested and investigated.

Abstract

It has been assumed that the interpretive effects of Merge are supposedto be captured in terms of some local context of a Merging operation. Inthis paper it is claimed that the interpretive effects of Merge should becaptured not only syntactically or morphologically but alsophonologically or semantically (functionally as well) in terms of non‐determinism proposed in Yang (2013). According to non‐determinism, Ipropose there should be recognized three types of interpretive effects interms of LF and PF effects: (a) LF‐PF Interpretive Effect, (b) PF‐onlyInterpretive Effect, and (c) LF‐only Interpretive Effect. For the theory ofthree types of interpretive effects according to non‐determinism, it isnaturally assumed that the notion of edge feature (EF) of Chomsky(2008) has to be eliminated (Yang 2013). Hence, my non‐deterministictheory of interpretive effects works with the null hypothesis of Merge asproposed in Yang (2013). Given the null hypothesis of Merge for theinterpretive effects of Merge, ambiguity or multiplicity of the interpretiveeffects per Merge may be systematically captured. At the same time, amovement theory based on free Merge along with proper interpretiveeffects is suggested and investigated.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Aboh, Enoch Olade, "The morphosyntax of complement‐head sequences: Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa" (2004), Oxford University Press
  2. Bošković, Željko, "On the locality and motivation of move and agree: an even more minimal theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.589~644 (2007)
  3. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  4. Chomsky, Noam., "Step by step:Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  5. Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  6. Chomsky, Noam, "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
  7. Chomsky, Noam, "Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
  8. Heck, F., "Successive cyclicity, long‐distance superiority, and local optimization", WCCFL, 19, pp.218~231 (2000)
  9. Kang, Young Se, "Case licensing", Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, 5, pp.342~347 (1993)
  10. Kučerová, Ivona, "The T‐extension condition", 석사, pp.2007
  11. Lavine, James, "The subject of defective T(ense) in Slavic", Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10, pp.112~135 (2002)
  12. Lasnik, Howard, "Move α" (1992), MIT Press
  13. Marantz, Alec, "Case and licensing", 석사, pp.1991
  14. Miyagawa, Shigeru, "Why Agree? Why Move? Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 54" (2010), MIT Press
  15. Neeleman, A., "The nature of discourse template", 석사, pp.2007
  16. Nissenbaum, J., "Investigations of covert phrase movement", 박사, pp.2000
  17. Preminger, Omer, "Toxic syntax: yet another theory of syntactic movement", 석사, pp.2007
  18. Putnam, Michael, "Scrambling and the survive principle" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  19. Richards, Norvin, "A distinctness condition on linearization", 석사, pp.2007
  20. Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized minimality" (1990), MIT Press
  21. Rizzi, Luigi., "WH‐movement moving on" (2006)
  22. Thráinsson, Höskuldur, "The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory" (2001)
  23. Tsai, Dylan, "On Subject Specificity and Theory of Syntax and Semantic Interface", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 10, pp.129~168 (2001)
  24. Wiland, B., "Aspects of order preservation in English and Polish", 박사, pp.2009
  25. Yang, Dong‐Whee, "Focus movements, distinctness condition, and intervention effects", Paper presented at The Third International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (2005), Harvard University
  26. Yang, Dong‐Whee, "Defective agree, focus effects, and the phasal movement hypothesis", 석사, pp.2006
  27. 양동휘, "Edge Feature, D-effects, and Movement", 생성문법연구, 19(1), pp.83~132 (2009), 한국생성문법학회
  28. 양동휘, "On the Notion of Feature Inheritance", 생성문법연구, 21(1), pp.141~154 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
  29. 양동휘, "The Global Non-determinism and the Theory of Interpretive Effects", 생성문법연구, 22(4), pp.723~737 (2012), 한국생성문법학회
  30. 양동휘, "Non-determinism and the Derivational Null Hypothesis", 생성문법연구, 23(4), pp.709~726 (2013), 한국생성문법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)