Edge Feature, D-effects, and Movement
2
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the non‐deterministic theory of movement based on the notion of edge feature (EF) (Chomsky 1995). It will be claimed that the theory of movement based on EF, i.e., the theory of unmarked vs. marked IM, is more explanatory than the deterministic probe‐goal checking theory of movement (Chomsky 2000, 2001). Specifically, the notion of unmarked IM is motivated as a movement that should be Agree‐free, whereas the notion of marked IM is motivated as a restricted obligatory movement. The unmarked IM is characterized as inducing the default semantic effect called "D‐effect", which is simply due to the optionality of the operation of unmarked IM itself (Fox 2000), whereas the marked IM is characterized as induced by blocking the "optional deletion" of the EF. It will be argued that interactions between unmarked and marked IMs account for various syntactic issues like intermediate links of successive‐cyclic movements. The notion of Agree independent of movement is motivated for the non‐deterministic theory of movement.
Abstract
This paper discusses the non‐deterministic theory of movement based on the notion of edge feature (EF) (Chomsky 1995). It will be claimed that the theory of movement based on EF, i.e., the theory of unmarked vs. marked IM, is more explanatory than the deterministic probe‐goal checking theory of movement (Chomsky 2000, 2001). Specifically, the notion of unmarked IM is motivated as a movement that should be Agree‐free, whereas the notion of marked IM is motivated as a restricted obligatory movement. The unmarked IM is characterized as inducing the default semantic effect called "D‐effect", which is simply due to the optionality of the operation of unmarked IM itself (Fox 2000), whereas the marked IM is characterized as induced by blocking the "optional deletion" of the EF. It will be argued that interactions between unmarked and marked IMs account for various syntactic issues like intermediate links of successive‐cyclic movements. The notion of Agree independent of movement is motivated for the non‐deterministic theory of movement.
참고문헌 (35)
- Aboh, E. O., "The morphosyntax of complement‐head sequences: Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Boscovic, Zeljko, "Topicalization, Focalization, Lexical Insertion, and Scrambling", Linguistic Inquiry, 35(4) (2004)
- Bošković, Željko, "On the locality and motivation of move and agree: an even more minimal theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.589~644 (2007)
- Bruening, Benjamin, "Syntax at the Edge: Cross‐Clausal Phenomena and the Syntax of Passamaqhoddy", 박사, pp.2001
- Cable, Seth, "Q‐Particles and the Nature of Wh‐Fronting", 석사, pp.2007
- Choi, Hye‐Won, "Optimizing structure in context: Scrambling and information structure. Dissertations in Linguistics" (1999), CSLI Publications
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program", 석사, pp.1995
- Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), The MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by Phase in: Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "On Phases", 석사, pp.2005
- Chosmky, Noam, "The Theory of Principles and Parameters, Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", ~ (1993)
- Fox, Danny, "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), The MIT Press
- Fox, Danny, "Extraction and Scope: A Case for Overt QR", WCCFL, 18 (1999)
- Heck, F., "Successive cyclicity, long‐distance superiority, and local optimization", Proceedings of WCCFL, 통권 : 19, pp.218~231 (2000)
- Heim, Irena, "The Semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases", 박사, pp.1982
- Kang, Y.‐S., "Case licensing", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 5, pp.342~347 (1993)
- in the overt syntax, "Natural Language and Linguistic Theory", 2006, 867~916
- Lavine, James, "The Subject of Defective T(ense) in Slavic", Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10 (2002)
- McClosky, James, "Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program", pp.184~226 (2002), Blackwell
- Miyagawa, Shigeru, "A‐movement scrambling and options without optionality, In Word order and scrambling", pp.177~200 (2003), Blackwell Publishing
- Miyagawa, Shigeru, "On the EPP", 석사, pp.2004
- Neeleman, A., "The Nature of discourse template", 석사, pp.2007
- Putnam, Michael, "Scrambling and the survive principle" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Preminger, Omer, "Toxic syntax: yet another theory of syntactic movement", 석사, pp.2007
- Putnam, Michael, "Scrambling and the survive principle" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Richards, Norvin, "Movement in Language: Interactions and Architecture" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Richards, Norvin, "A Distinctness Condition on Linearization", 석사, pp.2007
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized Minimality" (1990), The MIT Press
- Rizzi, Luigi, "On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects", 석사, pp.2004
- Saito, Mamoru, "Long‐Distance Scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~118 (1992)
- Saito, Mamoru, "Order in Phrase Structure and Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.439~474 (1998)
- Wiland, B., "Aspects of order preservation in English and Polish", 박사
- Yang, Dong‐Whee, "Focus Movements, Distinctness Condition, and Intervention Effects", Paper presented at The Third International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (2005), Harvard University
- Yang, Dong‐Whee, "Defective Agree, Focus Effects, and the Phasal Movement Hypothesis", 석사, pp.2006
- Zwart, Jan‐Wouter, "Word Order, Intonation, and Noun Phrase Interpretation in Dutch", 석사, pp.1995