Where Does Syntax Meet Morphology?: IP
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to explore a research question, where does syntax interact with morphology in interlanguage (IL) developments? For an answer to this question, this study proposes an IP-related Developmental Sequence (IDS) which constitutes an implicational scale of Single IP—Double IP—Multiple IP Stage. Each stage of the IDS incorporates two different dimensions of sequential developments according to the Modular Approach (Ellis, 1994; Gregg, 1996; White, 1987). The one is an IP-related Syntactic Developmental Sequence (ISDS), and the other is an IP-related Morphological Developmental Sequence (IMDS). Each Sequence follows an implicational scale of Underspecified IP→(ModP→AuxP*)→TP→AgrP→ForP stage, on each stage of which each relevant syntactic and morphological mechanism operates by incorporating the locality condition (LC) and the uniqueness condition (UC) with the Split-IP hypothesis and the Split-AuxP hypothesis. From the corollary of this, an answer to our research question can be obtained; IP. That is, syntax on the ISDS interacts with morphology on the IMDS, and hence syntactic IL developments along with the ISDS entail morphological IL developments along with the IMDS. Thus, the ISDS and the IMDS hinge on and interact with each other under the IDS.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore a research question, where does syntax interact with morphology in interlanguage (IL) developments? For an answer to this question, this study proposes an IP-related Developmental Sequence (IDS) which constitutes an implicational scale of Single IP—Double IP—Multiple IP Stage. Each stage of the IDS incorporates two different dimensions of sequential developments according to the Modular Approach (Ellis, 1994; Gregg, 1996; White, 1987). The one is an IP-related Syntactic Developmental Sequence (ISDS), and the other is an IP-related Morphological Developmental Sequence (IMDS). Each Sequence follows an implicational scale of Underspecified IP→(ModP→AuxP*)→TP→AgrP→ForP stage, on each stage of which each relevant syntactic and morphological mechanism operates by incorporating the locality condition (LC) and the uniqueness condition (UC) with the Split-IP hypothesis and the Split-AuxP hypothesis. From the corollary of this, an answer to our research question can be obtained; IP. That is, syntax on the ISDS interacts with morphology on the IMDS, and hence syntactic IL developments along with the ISDS entail morphological IL developments along with the IMDS. Thus, the ISDS and the IMDS hinge on and interact with each other under the IDS.
참고문헌 (28)
- Anderson, J, "Language, memory, and thought" (1976), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Atkinson, M, "Children's syntax, In An introduction to principles and parameters theory" (1992), Blackwell
- Chomsky, N, "A Minimalist program for linguistic theory, In The view from building 20", pp.1~52 (1992), MIT Press
- Doughty, C, "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Ellis, R, "Task-based language learning and leaching" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Fӕrch, C, "The role of comprehension in second language acquisition", Applied Linguistics, 7, pp.257~274 (1986)
- Flex, S. W, "Maturational aspects of Universal Grammar, In Interlanguage", pp.133~161 (1984), Edinburgh University Press
- Gregg, K. R, "The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition, In Handbook of second language acquisition", pp.49~81 (1996), Academic Press
- Haegeman, L, "English grammar" (1999), Blackwel
- Haznedar, B, "The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 English", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, pp.1~39 (2001)
- Haznedar, B, "The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: Evidence from the acquisition of CP", Second Language Research, 19, pp.1~44 (2003)
- 김용명, "An Extended Syntactic Developmental Sequence", 생성문법연구, 16(3), pp.405~423 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- Yong Myeong Kim, "A Unificational Mechanism for Morphological Developmental Sequence", 어학연구, 42(1), pp.139~159 (2006), 언어교육원
- Kim, Yong Myeong, "Testing the syntactic developmental sequence (SDS)", Language and Linguistics, 43, pp.21~52 (2008)
- 김용명, "An IP-related Syntactic Developmental Sequence (ISDS)", 영어어문교육, 19(1), pp.157~176 (2013), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Kim, Yong Myeong, "A parallel developmental sequence in second language acquisition, In Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing", pp.239~275 (2007), Cambridge Scholars Press
- Lightfoot, D, "How to set parameter, In arguments from language change" (1981), The MIT press
- Pienemann, M, "Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, pp.186~214 (1985)
- Pienemann, M, "Language processing and second language development processability theory" (1998), John Benjamins
- Pienemann, M, "Factors influencing the developmental of language proficiency, In Applying second language acquisition research", pp.45~141 (1987), National Curriculum Resource Center
- Radford, A, "English syntax, In An introduction" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Robinson, P, "Consciousness, rules, and instructed second language acquisition" (1996), Peter Lang
- Swan, M, "Learner English" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Vainikka, A, "Direct access to X-bar theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German, In Language acquisition studies in generative grammar", pp.265~316 (1994), John Benjamines
- Vainikka, A, "The early stages in adult L2 syntax: Additional evidence form Romance speaker", Second Language Research, 12, pp.140~176 (1996)
- Vainikka, A, "The initial state in the L2 acquisition of phrase structure, In The generative study of second language acquisition", pp.17~34 (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum
- White, L, "Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence", Applied Linguistics, 8, pp.95~110 (1987)
- White, L, "Universal Grammar and second language acquisition" (1989), John Benjamins