An IP-related Morphological Developmental Sequence
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
The purpose of this study is to explore our research question: How can we capture the degrees of morphological complexity in IP-related structures by what mechanism? As a possible answer to this question, it proposes an IP-related morphological developmental sequence (IMDS) in terms of the associations of the unificational mechanism (UM) (Kim, 2006b) and the Split-IP hypothesis (Haegeman & Guéron, 1999) and the Split-AuxP hypothesis (Radford, 2004). The IMDS follows an implicational scale of Underspecified IP—(ModP—AuxP*)—TP—AgrP—ForP stage, on each stage of which the uniqueness condition (UC) applies to the domain of the [UIP...], the [ModP…], the [AuxP…], the [TP...], the [AgrP...], and the [ForP…] sequentially in terms of the UM, on each domain of which feature unification takes place, and hence modal systems, aspect systems, and aux systems are realized by interacting the locality condition (LC) with the Split-IP and the Split-AuxP hypothesis. Finally, it shows that feature unification processes on each stage of the IMDS will be examined on the interlanguage data from sequence-based SLA research by drawing on morphological gaps between the triggering force and the triggering cue.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore our research question: How can we capture the degrees of morphological complexity in IP-related structures by what mechanism? As a possible answer to this question, it proposes an IP-related morphological developmental sequence (IMDS) in terms of the associations of the unificational mechanism (UM) (Kim, 2006b) and the Split-IP hypothesis (Haegeman & Guéron, 1999) and the Split-AuxP hypothesis (Radford, 2004). The IMDS follows an implicational scale of Underspecified IP—(ModP—AuxP*)—TP—AgrP—ForP stage, on each stage of which the uniqueness condition (UC) applies to the domain of the [UIP...], the [ModP…], the [AuxP…], the [TP...], the [AgrP...], and the [ForP…] sequentially in terms of the UM, on each domain of which feature unification takes place, and hence modal systems, aspect systems, and aux systems are realized by interacting the locality condition (LC) with the Split-IP and the Split-AuxP hypothesis. Finally, it shows that feature unification processes on each stage of the IMDS will be examined on the interlanguage data from sequence-based SLA research by drawing on morphological gaps between the triggering force and the triggering cue.
참고문헌 (24)
- Anderson, J, "Language, memory, and thought" (1976), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Atkinson, M, "Children's syntax: An introduction to principles and parameters theory" (1992), Blackwell
- Chomsky, N, "A Minimalist program for linguistic theory, In The view from building 20", pp.1~52 (1992), MIT Press
- Doughty, C, "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Ellis, R, "Task-based language learning and leaching" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Fӕrch, C, "The role of comprehension in second language acquisition", Applied Linguistics, 7, pp.257~274 (1986)
- Haegeman, L, "English grammar" (1999), Blackwell
- Haznedar, B, "The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 English", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, pp.1~39 (2001)
- Haznedar, B, "The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: Evidence from the acquisition of CP", Second Language Research, 19, pp.1~44 (2003)
- 김용명, "An Extended Syntactic Developmental Sequence", 생성문법연구, 16(3), pp.405~423 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- Yong Myeong Kim, "A Unificational Mechanism for Morphological Developmental Sequence", 어학연구, 42(1), pp.139~159 (2006), 언어교육원
- Kim, Y. M, "Testing the syntactic developmental sequence (SDS)", Language and Linguistics, 43, pp.21~52 (2008)
- 김용명, "Where Does Syntax Meet Morphology?: IP", 언어, 38(1), pp.87~114 (2013), 한국언어학회
- 김용명, "An IP-related Syntactic Developmental Sequence (ISDS)", 영어어문교육, 19(1), pp.157~176 (2013), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Kim, Y. M, "A parallel developmental sequence in second language acquisition, In Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing", pp.239~275 (2007), Cambridge Scholars Press
- Lightfoot, D, "How to set parameter: arguments from language change" (1981), The MIT press
- Pienemann, M, "Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, pp.186~214 (1985)
- Pienemann, M, "Language processing and second language development processability theory" (1998), John Benjamins
- Pienemann, M, "Factors influencing the developmental of language proficiency, In Applying second language acquisition research", pp.45~141 (1987), National Curriculum Resource Center
- Radford, A, "English syntax: An introduction" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Robinson, P, "Consciousness, rules, and instructed second language acquisition" (1996), Peter Lang
- Swan, M, "Learner English" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- White, L, "Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence", Applied Linguistics, 8, pp.95~110 (1987)
- White, L, "Universal Grammar and second language acquisition" (1989), John Benjamins