본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

청소년 담화에 나타난 동사의 의미범주 분포

Distribution of Semantic Categories of Verbs Used in Discourses of Youths.

배희숙
한국언어학회 (The Linguistic Society of Korea)|2018.12|언어 (Korean Journal of Linguistics)|제43권 제4호|pp. 737-760|DOI 10.18855/lisoko.2018.43.4.004

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

semantic categoryfrequencyverbdiscoursegeneral youthdelinquent youth.
주제분류언어학

초록

Hee Sook Bae. 2018. Distribution of Semantic Categories of Verbs Used in Discourses of Youths. Korean Journal of Linguistics. 43-4, 737-760. This work is a follow-up of previous studies on semantic categories of adjectives(2017a) and nouns(2017b). The purpose of this present study is to analyze the distribution of verbs’ semantic categories used in discourses of two different youth groups(general youths (GY), delinquent youths (DY)). In this study, we firstly extracted the list of verbs and the concordances from the discourse data collected in the previous works. Secondly, we distinguished different meanings of each verb depending on lexico-semantic criteria. Thirdly, we matched each verb meaning to its corresponding concept node of CoreNet. Lastly, we analyzed the distribution of verbs. As a result, the ratio of verbs(NTV/NTW) and the ratio of different verbs(NDV/NDW) were significantly higher in DY group than GY group. However, lexical diversity(NDW/NTW) and verb diversity(NDV/NTV) were almost the same in the two groups. For the semantic categories, the verbs used in the corpus were widely distributed in the three top nodes: [abstract thing], [abstract fact], and [abstract relationship]. Especially they were concentrated in the subcategories of [abstract fact]. GY group most frequently used [exchange], [relationship/reconciliation], [respect/trust], [affection/dislike], while DY group frequently used [come/go], [meeting], [entertaining], [trust/betray], [mocking], and so on. In addition, the distribution of semantic categories of verbs commonly used by the two groups was related to concept of the discourse topic <friend> in each group. On the contrary, the distribution of verbs’ semantic categories appeared only in a group tend to reflect specific environment of each group. These results can be applied to language intervention for adolescents with language learning disability and automatic distinction of discourse types of youths based on semantic category of verbs. (Woosong University)

Abstract

Hee Sook Bae. 2018. Distribution of Semantic Categories of Verbs Used in Discourses of Youths. Korean Journal of Linguistics. 43-4, 737-760. This work is a follow-up of previous studies on semantic categories of adjectives(2017a) and nouns(2017b). The purpose of this present study is to analyze the distribution of verbs’ semantic categories used in discourses of two different youth groups(general youths (GY), delinquent youths (DY)). In this study, we firstly extracted the list of verbs and the concordances from the discourse data collected in the previous works. Secondly, we distinguished different meanings of each verb depending on lexico-semantic criteria. Thirdly, we matched each verb meaning to its corresponding concept node of CoreNet. Lastly, we analyzed the distribution of verbs. As a result, the ratio of verbs(NTV/NTW) and the ratio of different verbs(NDV/NDW) were significantly higher in DY group than GY group. However, lexical diversity(NDW/NTW) and verb diversity(NDV/NTV) were almost the same in the two groups. For the semantic categories, the verbs used in the corpus were widely distributed in the three top nodes: [abstract thing], [abstract fact], and [abstract relationship]. Especially they were concentrated in the subcategories of [abstract fact]. GY group most frequently used [exchange], [relationship/reconciliation], [respect/trust], [affection/dislike], while DY group frequently used [come/go], [meeting], [entertaining], [trust/betray], [mocking], and so on. In addition, the distribution of semantic categories of verbs commonly used by the two groups was related to concept of the discourse topic <friend> in each group. On the contrary, the distribution of verbs’ semantic categories appeared only in a group tend to reflect specific environment of each group. These results can be applied to language intervention for adolescents with language learning disability and automatic distinction of discourse types of youths based on semantic category of verbs. (Woosong University)

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 강범모, "형태소 연속 표현과 어휘틀: 형용사와 동사의 분포와 의미", 언어학, (79), pp.3~26 (2017), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  2. 길은배, "청소년의 비속어, 은어 사용에 관한 연구 - 청소년의 언어 일탈, 통과 의례적 문화인가? -", 청소년학연구, 21(2), pp.469~489 (2014), 한국청소년학회
  3. 김영진, "한국어 동사의 의미역정보 처리과정", 인지과학, 18(2), pp.91~112 (2007), 한국인지과학회[DOI]
  4. 김윤신, "국어 사동문에 나타난 사동 행위의 직·간접성 －사동문의 논항 구조와 사건 구조를 중심으로－", 우리말연구, (30), pp.111~143 (2012), 우리말학회[DOI]
  5. 남승호, "한국어 술어의 사건 구조와 상적 의미", 인문논총, (52), pp.75~124 (2004), 인문학연구원
  6. 남승호, "기점과 착점 논항의 통사-의미 구조에 대한 유형론적 연구", 언어, 34(3), pp.473~527 (2009), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  7. 민은진, "학령기 아동의 일기문에 나타난 용언의 의미범주 발달", 언어치료연구, 25(3), pp.27~41 (2016), 한국언어치료학회[DOI]
  8. 기초학력검사, "박경숙", 국립특수교육원, ~ (2005)
  9. 박창영, "한국어 공간동사의 의미 유형과 사건구조 -인지언어학적 어휘의미론의 관점에 따라-", 언어와 정보 사회, 31, pp.171~216 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  10. 박희진, "한국어 규칙 동사와 불규칙 동사의 심성 어휘집 접근 과정", 인지과학, 23(1), pp.1~23 (2012), 한국인지과학회[DOI]
  11. 배희숙, "소년원청소년과 일반청소년의 형용사 사용 비교-의미범주를 중심으로-", 언어, 42(3), pp.465~482 (2017), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  12. 배희숙, "비행청소년과 일반청소년의 담화에 나타난 명사의 의미범주 분포", 담화와 인지, 24(4), pp.65~86 (2017), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  13. 영유아 기초개념 이해도 검사, "배희숙", 특허청, ~ (2015)
  14. 신희성, "청소년 인터넷 언어의 문법교육적 수용에 대한 연구 - 학습자 인터넷 언어의 자기 점검 활동을 중심으로", 한국어문교육, 17, pp.139~175 (2015)
  15. 오경아, "학령전기 아동의 자발화에 나타난 동사의 의미 분류", 언어치료연구, 23(4), pp.63~72 (2014), 한국언어치료학회[DOI]
  16. 윤애선, "한국어 어휘 의미망 KorLex 2.0―의미 처리와 지식 공학을 위한 기반 언어 자원―", 한글, (295), pp.163~201 (2012), 한글학회
  17. 윤애선, "한국어 어휘의미망 「KorLex 1.5」의 구축", 정보과학회논문지 : 소프트웨어 및 응용, 36(1), pp.92~108 (2009), 한국정보과학회
  18. 이기연, "중·고등학교 학생들의 비속어 사용 실태에 관한 연구: 서울 및 수도권 거주 청소년을 대상으로", 한국어와 문화, 8, pp.143~178 (2010)
  19. 임지희, "어휘망(U-WIN)의 구문관계 자동구축", 정보과학회논문지 : 소프트웨어 및 응용, 35(10), pp.627~635 (2008), 한국정보과학회
  20. 조명한, "한국아동의 언어획득 연구: 책략모형" (1988), 서울대학교출판부
  21. 한국과학기술원 전문용어언어공학연구센터, "다국어어휘의미망(CoreNet: Core Multilingual Semantic Word Net)" (2005), 한국문화사
  22. 세종전자사전 최종 보고서, "홍재성", 문화체육관광부, ~ (2007)
  23. 황순희, "한국어 모국어 화자의 동사 사용과 의미적 근사치-Break-type과 Remove-type 동사를 중심으로-", 이중언어학, (68), pp.267~304 (2017), 이중언어학회[DOI]
  24. Bae, H. S., "Termes adjectivaux en corpus médical coréen: repérage et désambiguïsation", Terminology, 12(1), pp.19~50 (2006)
  25. Baker, C. F., "FrameNet's Frames vs. Levin's Verb Classes", Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.27~38 (2002)
  26. Baker, C. F., "The structure of the FrameNet Database", International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), pp.281~296 (2003)
  27. Bloom, P., "How children learn the meanings of words" (2002), MIT Press
  28. Brenza, A. Barbara, "Comprehension and Production of Basic Semantic Concepts by Older Hearing-impaired Children", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, pp.414~419 (1981)
  29. Chen T. P., "Semantic approximations in the early verbal lexicon acquisition of Chinese: flexibility against error", 1~12 (2006)
  30. Choi, K. S., "Procedures and problems in Korean-Chinese-Japanese WordNet with shared semantic hierarchy", Proceedings of Global WordNet Conferences (2004), Masaryk University
  31. Clark, E. V., "The lexicon in acquisition" (1993), Cambridge University Press
  32. Halliday, M. A. K., "An introduction to functional grammar" (2004), Oxford university press
  33. Huttenlocher, J., "Emergence of action categories in the child: evidence from verb meaning", Psychological Review, 90, pp.72~93 (1983)
  34. Ikehara, S., "The Semantic System, volume 1 of Goidaikei – A Japanese Lexicon" (1997), Iwanami Shoten
  35. Karin Kipper, "A Large-Scale Classification of English Verbs", Journal of Language Resources and Evaluation, 42(1), pp.21~40 (2008)
  36. Kipper, K., "A Large-Scale Classification of English Verbs", Journal of Language Resources and Evaluation, 42(1), pp.21~40 (2008)
  37. Levin, B., "English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary investigation" (1993), University of Chicago Press
  38. Miller, G. A., "Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database", International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4), pp.235~244 (1990)
  39. Muller, Ch, "통계언어학" (2000), 태학사
  40. Nippold, M. A., "Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: A study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development", Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, pp.125~138 (2005)
  41. Randall, J. H., "The Geometry of Argument Structure" (2010), Springer Netherlands
  42. Riegel, M., "Grammaire méthodique du français" (1994), PUF
  43. Skordos, D., "Lexical, Syntactic, and Semantic-Geometric Factors in the Acquisition of Motion Predicates", Developmental Psychology, 50(7), pp.1985~1998 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

소년원청소년과 일반청소년의 형용사 사용 비교-의미범주를 중심으로-배희숙한국언어학회 · 언어2017 · 제42권 제3호비행청소년과 일반청소년의 담화에 나타난 명사의 의미범주 분포배희숙담화·인지언어학회 · 담화와 인지2017 · 제24권 제4호학령기 아동의 기술 텍스트에 나타난 형용사 빈도 및 의미범주 분석배희숙한국언어학회 · 언어2017 · 제42권 제1호학령기 아동의 묘사적 글쓰기에 나타난 의미론적, 형태론적, 통사론적 발달 특성배희숙한국언어학회 · 언어2016 · 제41권 제3호경험 동사의 의미적 운율 연구최준한국사전학회 · 한국사전학2011 · 제18호중·고등학생의 어휘 사용에 관한 연구전은진, 최용석국어교육학회(since1969) · 국어교육연구2009 · 제45호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

언론 담화 날씨 용어의 은유 이론적 분석김해연pp. 671-693한국어 ‘다시’의 중의성: 전제 기반 어휘 분석류병래pp. 695-720중국인 학습자의 한국어 폐쇄음 인지 양상 연구박시균, 김지영pp. 721-736The use of a voice onset time cue in the perception of Seoul Korean stops as a function of listener gender김보람, 오은진, Kaori Idemarupp. 761-780Production and Processing of Phonaesthemes in L2 English윤관희pp. 781-806
원문 보기