세종말뭉치에 기초한 양보와 대조어미의 사용 분석
An Analysis of the Use of Concessive and Contrastive Endings based on Sejong Corpus
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Cho, Youngsoon. 2010. An Analysis of the Use of Concessive and Contrastive Endings based on Sejong Corpus. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 35-4, 1127-1148. This paper reports on an investigation of the use of Korean concessives and contrastives based on Sejong corpus (2007), specifically that of most frequently used concessive and contrastive endings. Among the endings identified as concessive and contrastive in the literature, the concordance search revealed that -nuntey, -ciman, -ato, and -(u)na are used most frequently. Based on further thorough examination of meanings of selected sentences from the concordance results, the research demonstrates four main findings. Firstly, the meaning of concession is expressed much more frequently than the meaning of contrast. Secondly, concessive and contrastive endings show different patterns in their use: In terms of the degrees to which the endings are used concessively and contrastively, -ciman is highest, -nundey is lowest, and -una and -ato are in between. Thirdly, based on frequencies and degrees to which the endings are used as concessives and contrastives, -ciman is revealed to be the most frequently used concessive and contrastive ending: The meaning of concession is expressed in the frequency order of -ciman, -ato, -una and -nuntey; The meaning of contrast is worded in the frequency order of -ciman, -nuntey, -una and -ato. Fourthly, the use of concessive meaning is most conspicuous in imaginative prose, which is un-informative and free to express the speaker in character, and that of contrastive meaning is comparatively apparent in spoken texts and discernible in news, in both of which the speaker/writer tries to draw the attention of the addressee/audience. (Chonnam National University)
Abstract
Cho, Youngsoon. 2010. An Analysis of the Use of Concessive and Contrastive Endings based on Sejong Corpus. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 35-4, 1127-1148. This paper reports on an investigation of the use of Korean concessives and contrastives based on Sejong corpus (2007), specifically that of most frequently used concessive and contrastive endings. Among the endings identified as concessive and contrastive in the literature, the concordance search revealed that -nuntey, -ciman, -ato, and -(u)na are used most frequently. Based on further thorough examination of meanings of selected sentences from the concordance results, the research demonstrates four main findings. Firstly, the meaning of concession is expressed much more frequently than the meaning of contrast. Secondly, concessive and contrastive endings show different patterns in their use: In terms of the degrees to which the endings are used concessively and contrastively, -ciman is highest, -nundey is lowest, and -una and -ato are in between. Thirdly, based on frequencies and degrees to which the endings are used as concessives and contrastives, -ciman is revealed to be the most frequently used concessive and contrastive ending: The meaning of concession is expressed in the frequency order of -ciman, -ato, -una and -nuntey; The meaning of contrast is worded in the frequency order of -ciman, -nuntey, -una and -ato. Fourthly, the use of concessive meaning is most conspicuous in imaginative prose, which is un-informative and free to express the speaker in character, and that of contrastive meaning is comparatively apparent in spoken texts and discernible in news, in both of which the speaker/writer tries to draw the attention of the addressee/audience. (Chonnam National University)
참고문헌 (42)
- 강범모, "한국어의 텍스트 장르와 언어 특성" (1999), 고려대학교 출판부
- 강범모, "통계적 방법에 의한 한국어 텍스트 유형 및 문체 분석", 언어학, (22) (1998)
- 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전", 두산동아, ~ (1999)
- 김영희, "국어의 접속문", 국어생활, 11 (1987), 국어연구소
- 김영희, "이른바 대립 접속문의 구조적 유형", 한글, (253) (2001)
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1983), 탑출판사
- 서정섭, "국어 양보문 연구" (1991), 한신문화사
- 서정수, "국어문법론" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 서태룡, "내포와 접속", 국어학, 8 (1979)
- 서태룡, "국어 활용어미의 형태와 의미" (1988), 탑출판사
- 신지연, "대립과 양보 접속어미의 범주화", 어문학, (84), pp.75~98 (2004), 한국어문학회
- 윤평현, "대립 접속어미에 대한 연구", 한글, (200) (1988)
- 윤평현, "국어의 접속어미에 대한 연구-의미론적 기능을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1989
- 윤평현, "국어의 선택관계 접속어미에 대한 연구", 한국언어문학, 38 (1997)
- 이기동, "대조·양보 접속어미의 의미 연구", 어학연구, 13(2) (1977)
- 이은경, "국어의 연결어미 연구" (2000), 태학사
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 임지룡, "상대성 접속어미 연구", 동양문화연구, 9 (1982)
- 전영옥, "구어와 문어의 접속 표현 비교 연구- ‘그런데, -는데’를 중심으로 -", 한말연구, 17(17), pp.169~194 (2005), 한말연구학회
- 전혜영, "현대 한국어 접속어미의 화용론적 연구", 박사, pp.1989
- 주시경, "국어문법" (1910), 박문서관
- 최재희, "국어의 접속문 구성 연구" (1991), 탑출판사
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 정음사
- 허웅, "우리옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
- 홍사만, "국어 특수 조사론" (1983), 학문사
- Abraham, W, "But", Studia Linguistica, 33(2) (1979)
- Azar, M, "Concessive relation as argumentation", Text, 17(3) (1997)
- Biber,D., "Corpus Linguistics: Investigating language structure and use" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Blakemore,D, "Semantic Constraints on Relevance" (1987), Oxford
- Blakemore,D, "Denial and contrast: a relevance theoretic analysis of BUT", Linguistics and Philosophy, 12 (1989)
- Crevels, "Concessives on different semantic levels: A typological perspective, in Cause, Condition, Concession and Contrast" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Foolen, Ad, "Polyfunctionality and the semantics of adversative conjunctions", Multilingua, 10 (1991)
- Izutsu,M.N, "Contrast, concessive and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relations", Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (2008)
- Kehler,A, "Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar" (2002), CSLI Publication
- 김용범, "On Concession", 언어와 정보, 6(1) (2002), 한국언어정보학회
- König,E, "The Meaning of Focus Particles, A Comparative Perspective" (1991), London and New York
- König,E., "Causal and concessive clauses: Formal and semantic relations, in Cause, Condition, Concession and Contrast" (2000), Berlin and London
- Lakoff,R, "If's, And's, and But's about Conjunction, in Studies in Linguistic Semantics" (1971), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc
- Lang,E, "The Semantics of Coordination" (1984), Amsterdam
- Pasch,R, "Kausale, konzessive und adversative Konnektive: Konnektive als Mittel des Ausdrucks von Diskurspräsuppositionen", Münstersches Logbuch zur Linguistik, 1 (1992)
- Spooren,W.P.M.S, "Some Aspects of the Form and Interpretation of Global Contrastive Coherence Relation", 박사, pp.1989
- Winter, Y, "Contrast and implication in natural language", Journal of Semantics, 11 (1994)