본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

The Markedness of Metalinguistic Negation: An Eye-tracking Study

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper is a preliminary research on the interpretation process of metalinguistic negation (or MN) as opposed to descriptive negation (or DN), using an eye-tracking method. It is generally assumed that MN is marked and takes more processing effort than DN. However, there has been no experimental evidence to confirm this assumption. In this research, we conducted two eye-tracking experiments using Korean negative sentences. Experiment 1 was designed to investigate the processing time of the clarification clause of an MN. The results confirmed that the clarification clause takes longer to process when the preceding negation is interpreted as an MN than when it is interpreted as a DN. We conclude that negation tends to be interpreted descriptively on a first pass, and when that DN interpretation turns out to be wrong, it is reanalyzed as an MN on a second pass. Experiment 2 was designed to examine the processing time of an MN when the clarification clause is provided before the negative clause. The results showed that MN takes more processing time than DN, even when the clarification clause is given in advance. The results of these two experiments confirmed the markedness of MN.

Abstract

This paper is a preliminary research on the interpretation process of metalinguistic negation (or MN) as opposed to descriptive negation (or DN), using an eye-tracking method. It is generally assumed that MN is marked and takes more processing effort than DN. However, there has been no experimental evidence to confirm this assumption. In this research, we conducted two eye-tracking experiments using Korean negative sentences. Experiment 1 was designed to investigate the processing time of the clarification clause of an MN. The results confirmed that the clarification clause takes longer to process when the preceding negation is interpreted as an MN than when it is interpreted as a DN. We conclude that negation tends to be interpreted descriptively on a first pass, and when that DN interpretation turns out to be wrong, it is reanalyzed as an MN on a second pass. Experiment 2 was designed to examine the processing time of an MN when the clarification clause is provided before the negative clause. The results showed that MN takes more processing time than DN, even when the clarification clause is given in advance. The results of these two experiments confirmed the markedness of MN.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Burton-Roberts, Noël, "On Horn's Dilemma: Presupposition and Negation", Journal of Linguistics, 25, pp.95~125 (1989)
  2. Burton-Roberts, Noël, "Presupposition-cancellation and Metalinguistic Negation: A Reply to Carston", Journal of Linguistics, 35, pp.347~364 (1999)
  3. Carston, Robyn, "Metalinguistic Negation and Echoic use", Journal of Pragmatics, 25, pp.309~330 (1996)
  4. Carston, Robyn, "Negation, Presupposition and The Semantics", Pragmatics Distinction, 1998, pp.34, 309~350
  5. Carston, Robyn, "Negation, Presupposition and Metarepresentation: A Response to Noël Burton-Roberts", Journal of Linguistics, 35, pp.365~389 (1999)
  6. Carston, Robyn, "A Truth-functional Account of Metalinguistic Negation, with Evidence from Korean", Language Sciences, 18, pp.485~504 (1996)
  7. Chapman, Siobahn, "Some Observations on Metalinguistic Negation", Journal of Linguistics, 32, pp.387~402 (1996)
  8. Choi, Seungja, "Explanations of Negation in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, pp.124~134 (1985)
  9. Dancygier, Barbara, "Two Metatextual Operators: Negation and Conditionality in English and Polish", Berkeley Linguistic Society, 18, pp.61~75 (1992)
  10. Davis, Wayne A., "‘Metalinguistic’ Negations, Denial, and Idioms", Journal of Pragmatics, 43, pp.2548~2577 (2011)
  11. Foolen, Ad, "Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity: Some Comments on a Proposal by Laurence Horn", Pragmatics, 1, pp.217~237 (1991)
  12. Grice, H. Paul, "Logic and Conversation, In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
  13. Horn, Laurence, "Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity", Language, 61, pp.121~174 (1985)
  14. Horn, Laurence, "A Natural History of Negation" (1989), University of Chicago Press
  15. 황주현, "Semantic Function of Three Forms of Negation in Korean", 언어, 34(1), pp.197~220 (2009), 한국언어학회
  16. Lee, Hye-Kyung, "Presupposition and Implicature under Negation", Journal of Pragmatics, 37, pp.595~609 (2005)
  17. Levinson, Stephen, "Presumptive Meaning: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature" (2000), MIT Press
  18. Liversedge, Simon P., "Eye Movements and Measures of Reading Time, In Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception", pp.55~75 (1998), Elsevier
  19. McCawley, James D., "Contrastive Negation and Metalinguistic Negation", The Parasession on Negation, 27, pp.189~206 (1991), Chicago Linguistic Society
  20. Noh, Eun-Ju, "Metarepresentation: A Relevance-Theory Approach" (2000), John Benjamins
  21. Rayner, Keith, "Lexical Complexity and Fixation Times in Reading: Effects of Word Frequency, Verb Complexity, and Lexical Ambiguity", Memory and Cognition, 14, pp.191~201 (1986)
  22. Seuren, Pieter, "Burton-Roberts on Presupposition and Negation", Journal of Linguistics, 26, pp.425~453 (1990)
  23. Sohn, Ho-Min, "The Korean Language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  24. Sperber, Dan, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1995), Blackwell
  25. Van der Sandt, Rob, "Denial and Negation", pp.1994

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)