의미범주와 구성원 전형성의 명명 순서 기반 연구
A Study on the Word Order Based Semantic Categories and Typicality of Category Members
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigates the typicality of category members based on the order mentioned in the naming task. The naming task, also known as controlled oral word association task, is a test in which a speaker names as many words as he or she can. The mentioned words in a certain category are produced in a limited time. The task is used to discover semantic knowledge and semantic fluency. The type and number of category members can vary depending on the individual. This study observes typicality in the category members based on the following factors: the first mentioned word, the characteristics in the sequence of mentioned words, the order of words mentioned in a lesser category, and the most mentioned word. Typicality is different from familiarity in the naming task. The result identifies Koreans think of a dog and a cow as typical members in the animal category; the typical subcategory of an animal is a farm animal. The study suggests a simple and appealing idea about the way people decide the most typical members in a category based on the order of utterance.
Abstract
This paper investigates the typicality of category members based on the order mentioned in the naming task. The naming task, also known as controlled oral word association task, is a test in which a speaker names as many words as he or she can. The mentioned words in a certain category are produced in a limited time. The task is used to discover semantic knowledge and semantic fluency. The type and number of category members can vary depending on the individual. This study observes typicality in the category members based on the following factors: the first mentioned word, the characteristics in the sequence of mentioned words, the order of words mentioned in a lesser category, and the most mentioned word. Typicality is different from familiarity in the naming task. The result identifies Koreans think of a dog and a cow as typical members in the animal category; the typical subcategory of an animal is a farm animal. The study suggests a simple and appealing idea about the way people decide the most typical members in a category based on the order of utterance.
참고문헌 (28)
- Aitchison, Jean, "Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics", pp.71~84 (1992), Macmillan
- Barsalou, Lawrence W., "Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, pp.629~654 (1985)
- 정유진, "의미범주 지식의 다양성과 보편성: 동물 범주 유창성 과제를 활용하여", 담화와 인지, 21(3), pp.209~232 (2014), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Croft, William, "Cognitive Linguistics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Coley, John, "Does rank have its privilege? Inductive inferences within folkbiological taxonomies", Cognition, 64(1), pp.73~112 (1997)
- Garrod, Simon, "Interpreting anaphoric relations : the interpretation of semantic information while reading", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, pp.77~90 (1977)
- Greenacre, Michael, "Correspondence Analysis in Practice", pp.2007, Chapman & Hall
- Hampton, James A., "Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, pp.441~461 (1979)
- Hampton, James A., "Measures of internal category structure: A correlational analysis of normative data", British Journal of Psychology, 74, pp.491~516 (1983)
- Kelter, Stephanie, "Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science", pp.2775~2804 (2012), De Gruyter
- Labov, William, "New ways of analyzing variation", pp.340~373 (1973), Georgetown University Press
- Liang, Xiuling, "How types of premises modulate the typicality effect in category-based induction: diverging evidence from the P2, P3, and LPC effects", Scientific Reports, 6(1), pp.1~13 (2016)
- 임지룡, "인지언어학적 관점에서 본 의미의 본질", 한국어 의미학, 21, pp.1~29 (2006), 한국어의미학회
- Loken, Barbara, "Alternative approaches to understanding the determinants of typicality", Journal of Consumer Research, 17, pp.111~126 (1990)
- Onishi, Kristine H., "Prototypicality in sentence production", Cognitive Psychology, 56(2), pp.103~141 (2008)
- Posnansky, Carla J., "Category norms for verbal items in 25 categories for children in grades 2–6", Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 10, pp.819~832 (1978)
- Prinz, Jesse J., "Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their Perceptual Basis" (2002), MIT Press
- Rosch, Eleanor, "Cognitive representations of semantic categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), pp.192~233 (1975)
- Rosch, Eleanor, "Cognition and categorization" (1978), Erlbaum
- Rosch, Eleanor, "Concepts and fuzzy logic", pp.89~120 (2011), MIT Press
- Rosch, Eleanor, "Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories", Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), pp.573~605 (1975)
- 신효필, "온톨로지(Ontology)를 기반으로 하는 개념구조와 어휘기술", 어학연구, 40(3), pp.513~542 (2004), 언어교육원
- Taylor, John R., "Linguistic categorization" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Watson, Rachel, "Language as category: Using prototype theory to create reference points for the study of multilingual data", Language and Cognition, 11(1), pp.125~164 (2019)[DOI]
- Winkler-Rhoades, "Naming the animals that come to mind : Effects of culture and experience on category fluency", Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, pp.205~220 (2010)
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig, "Philosophical Investigations" (1958), Macmillan
- 윤석만, "원형이론'과 언어의미", 언어와언어학, (31), pp.95~114 (2003), 언어연구소
- 윤덕한, "사전에 나타난인지정보를 이용한 단어 개념의 지식표현", 한국정보과학회 언어공학연구회학술발표 논문집, 16(1), pp.118~125 (2004)