초등 발명 교육에서 창의적 산출물 평가 요소의 적합도 분석: Besemer(1998)의 창의적 산출물 평가 요소를 중심으로

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the evaluation criteria appropriateness of creative products in elementary invention education based on the Creative Products Analysis Matrix (Besemer, 1998). To accomplish this purpose the ‘evaluation validity-evaluation easiness matrix’ was established. The main results of this study were as follows: First, The mean score of ‘evaluation validity’ was 3.67 points and the range was 4.53∼2.87 points. The evaluation criteria in order of mean score were as follows. ‘Useful’ 4.53, ‘valuable’ 4.43, ‘original’ 4.23, ‘well-crafted’ 3.90, ‘surprising’ 3.73, ‘logical’ 3.20, ‘understandable’ 3.17, and ‘elegant’ 2.97 points. Second, The mean score of ‘evaluation easiness’ was 3.49 points and the range was 4.03∼2.77 points. The evaluation criteria in order of mean score were as follows. ‘Well-crafted’ 4.03, ‘useful’ 3.93, ‘elegant’ 3.83, ‘original’ 3.77, ‘surprising’ 3.63, ‘understandable’ 3.60, ‘valuable’ 2.97, ‘logical’ 2.83, and ‘organic’ 2.77 points. Third, In the ‘evaluation validity-evaluation easiness matrix’ 4 evaluation criteria of ‘original’, ‘surprising’, ‘useful’, and ‘well-crafted’ were sited in Quadrant Ⅰ and these criteria were verified in terms of appropriateness. 2 evaluation criteria of ‘understandable’ and ‘elegant’ were sited in Quadrant Ⅱ. 2 evaluation criteria of ‘logical’ and ‘organic’ were sited in Quadrant Ⅲ and these criteria were required to reexamine in terms of appropriateness. 1 evaluation criterion of ‘valuable’ was sited in Quadrant Ⅳ and this criterion was developed with evaluation guide-line.