C-command and Beyond: The Emerging Universe of Formal and Non-Formal Relations
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It has long been debated whether meaning relations (MR), class of interpretative phenomena that includes bound variable anaphora, distributive readings, and coreference, are licensed by specific c-command configurations. As it turns out, both sides of this debate are correct; there are a multitude of underlying relations that can serve as sources for MR, at least one of which, but not all, relies on c-command. The other, non-c-command-based relations generally rely on semantic and/or pragmatic factors, such as topicality and genericity. A survey of these different MR-sources reveals that, while their interactions are complex, the influence of each can be isolated by applying the appropriate diagnostics and procedures. As such, it is possible to control these sources, and, in particular, to do so in such a way that those sources that do not rely on c-command are suppressed, which creates an environment in which MR-acceptability judgements are robustly informative about the underlying syntactic structure of a given utterance.
Abstract
It has long been debated whether meaning relations (MR), class of interpretative phenomena that includes bound variable anaphora, distributive readings, and coreference, are licensed by specific c-command configurations. As it turns out, both sides of this debate are correct; there are a multitude of underlying relations that can serve as sources for MR, at least one of which, but not all, relies on c-command. The other, non-c-command-based relations generally rely on semantic and/or pragmatic factors, such as topicality and genericity. A survey of these different MR-sources reveals that, while their interactions are complex, the influence of each can be isolated by applying the appropriate diagnostics and procedures. As such, it is possible to control these sources, and, in particular, to do so in such a way that those sources that do not rely on c-command are suppressed, which creates an environment in which MR-acceptability judgements are robustly informative about the underlying syntactic structure of a given utterance.
참고문헌 (38)
- Barker, Chris, "Quantificational binding does not require c-command", Linguistic Inquiry, 43(4), pp.614~633 (2012)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Syntactic Structures" (1957), Mouton & Co
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Evans, Gareth, "Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses", Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7(3), pp.467~536 (1977)
- Evans, Gareth, "Pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 11(2), pp.337~362 (1980)
- Geach, Peter Thomas, "Reference and Generality" (1962), Cornell University Press, Ithaca
- Hayashishita, J. -R, "Syntactic and Non-Syntactic Scope", PhD, pp.2004
- Hayashishita, J. -R, "On the nature of inverse scope readings", Gengo Kenkyu : The Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan, 143, pp.29~68 (2013)
- Hoji, Hajime, "Demonstrative Binding and Principle B", Proceedings of NELS, 25, pp.255~271 (1995)
- Hoji, Hajime, "Language Faculty Science" (2015), Cambridge University Press
- "Galileo's other challenge" (2017)[URL]
- Hoji, Hajime, "The Theory and Practice of Language Faculty Science" (2022), Mouton de Gruyter
- Hoji, Hajime, "The Theory and Practice of Language Faculty Science" (2022), Mouton de Gruyter
- Hoji, Hajime, "The Theory and Practice of Language Faculty Science" (2022), Mouton de Gruyter
- Hoji Hajime, "Demonstratives, bound variables, and reconstruction effects", Proceedings of the Nanzan GLOW : The Second GLOW Meeting in Asia, pp.141~158 (2000)
- Jackendoff, Ray, "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Structure" (1972), MIT Press
- Kitagawa, Yoshihisa, "Gradience in Grammar Generative Perspectives" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Klima, Edward, "The Structure of Language", pp.246~323 (1964), Prentice-Hall
- Kuroda, S. -Y., "Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language", Doctoral, pp.1965
- Kuroda, S. Y, "The categorical and the thetic judgement : evidence from Japanese syntax", Foundations of Language, 9, pp.153~185 (1972)
- Li, Charles, "Mandarin Chinese : A Functional Reference Grammar" (1981), University of California Press
- Li, Y. -H. Audrey, "Argument determiner phrases and number phrases", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.693~702 (1998)
- Matthewson, Lisa, "On the methodology of semantic fieldwork", International Journal of American Linguistics, 70(4), pp.369~415 (2004)
- May, Robert, "The Grammar of Quantification", PhD, pp.1977
- Mukai, Emi, "The Theory and Practice of Language Faculty Science" (2022), Mouton de Gruyter
- Postal, Paul, "Cross-Over Phenomena" (1971), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Plesniak, Daniel, "Towards a Correlational Law of Language : Three Factors Constraining Judgement Variation", PhD, pp.2022
- Plesniak, Daniel, "The Theory and Practice of Language Faculty Science" (2022), Mouton de Gruyter
- Plesniak, Daniel, "Possibility-Seeking Experiments: Testing Syntactic Hypotheses on the Level of the Individual" (2023), Studies of Generative Grammar
- Reinhart, Tanya, "The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora", PhD, pp.1976
- Reinhart, Tanya, "Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation" (1983), University of Chicago Press
- Roberts, Craige, "Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse", Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, pp.683~721 (1989)
- "Empirical evidence in researchon meaning" (2016)[URL]
- Ueyama, Ayumi, "Two Types of Dependency", PhD, pp.1998
- Ueyama, Ayumi, "Nihongo-no Syubun-gensyoo: Toogo-koozoo to Modality (Root Phenomena in Japanese: Syntactic Structure and Modality", pp.113~144 (2007), Hituzi Publishers
- Ueyama, Ayumi, "The Theory and Practice of Language Faculty Science" (2022), Mouton de Gruyter
- Wasow, Thomas, "Anaphoric Relations in English", PhD, pp.1972