본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A multi-level analysis of subjecthood diagnostics in Korean

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

There have been proposed several different diagnostics for identifying the subject in Korean. Among the previous studies, Hong (1991/1994) investigated 9 subjecthood diagnostics and classified them into a few groups. This paper is based on previous experimental studies and statistically examines how Hong's classifications affect each subjecthood diagnostics and the acceptability scores of native speakers. Among the 9 subjecthood diagnostics, the experimental data for 6 subjecthood diagnostics were taken and they were statistically examined. This paper organized 6 subjecthood diagnostics into 3 groups following Hong's classifications, and it statistically examined how each group and each diagnostics affected the acceptability scores of native speakers. A multi-level/hierarchical Generalized Linear Mixed-effects (Regression) Model was adopted to statistically examine the influence of each group of diagnostics. Through the analysis, the following two facts were observed: (i) Each group of classification did NOT play a significant role in the subjecthood diagnostics, and (ii) Honorific Agreement and Plural Copying demonstrated statistically different behaviors from the other 4 subjecthood diagnostics.

Abstract

There have been proposed several different diagnostics for identifying the subject in Korean. Among the previous studies, Hong (1991/1994) investigated 9 subjecthood diagnostics and classified them into a few groups. This paper is based on previous experimental studies and statistically examines how Hong's classifications affect each subjecthood diagnostics and the acceptability scores of native speakers. Among the 9 subjecthood diagnostics, the experimental data for 6 subjecthood diagnostics were taken and they were statistically examined. This paper organized 6 subjecthood diagnostics into 3 groups following Hong's classifications, and it statistically examined how each group and each diagnostics affected the acceptability scores of native speakers. A multi-level/hierarchical Generalized Linear Mixed-effects (Regression) Model was adopted to statistically examine the influence of each group of diagnostics. Through the analysis, the following two facts were observed: (i) Each group of classification did NOT play a significant role in the subjecthood diagnostics, and (ii) Honorific Agreement and Plural Copying demonstrated statistically different behaviors from the other 4 subjecthood diagnostics.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Baayen, Harald, "Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  2. Bard, Ellen, "Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability", Language, 72, pp.32~68 (1996)
  3. Cowart, Wayne, "Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments" (1997), Sage Publications
  4. hierarchical models, "Data analysis using regression and multilevel", pp.2006, Gelman, Andrew
  5. Gries, Stefan St, "Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction" (2013), Gruyter
  6. Hong, Ki-Ssun, "Argument selection and case-marking in Korean", PhD, pp.1991
  7. Hong, Ki-sun, "Subjecthood tests in Korean", Language Research, 30(1), pp.99~136 (1994)
  8. Johnson, Keith, "Quantitative methods in linguistics" (2008), Blackwell
  9. Keller, Frank, "Gradient in grammar: Experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality", PhD, pp.2000
  10. Honorific agreement and plural copying as subject diagnostics in Korean: An experimental approach, "Kim, Eunah", Seoul National University, ~ (2015)
  11. 김지혜, "Obligatory Control and Coordinated Deletion as Korean Subject Diagnostics: An Experimental Approach", 언어와 정보, 19(1), pp.75~101 (2015), 한국언어정보학회
  12. 이용훈, "Reflexive Binding and Adjunct Control as Subject Diagnostics in Korean: An Experimental Approach", 언어연구, 31(2), pp.427~449 (2015), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
  13. Lodge, Milton, "Magnitude scaling: Quantitative measurement of opinions" (1981), Sage Publications
  14. Pinheiro, José, "Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus" (2000), Springer
  15. Schütze, Carson, "The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology" (1996), University of Chicago Press
  16. Sprouse, Jon, "Experimental syntax and island effects", pp.1~17 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  17. Stevenson, Stanley, "Psycholinguistics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects" (1975), John Wiley
  18. Yoon, James, "Some queries concerning the syntax of multiple subject constructions in Korean", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 16, pp.215~236 (1986)
  19. Youn, Cheong, "A relational analysis of Korean multiple nominative constructions", PhD, pp.1990
  20. Zuur, Alain, "Mixed effects models and extensions in Ecology with R" (2009), Springer

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)