鄕歌의 근대 2 - 小倉進平가 [鄕歌及び吏讀の硏究]에 붙인 自筆 메모

Abstract

I reconstituted the original scenery of Hyang-ga study before and after 1930, and watched Judong Yang with Shinpei Ogura. It was scientific, and Ogura with the advantage of 'from Teikoku University' made historic efforts according to the study that he learned at a university thoroughly to do it. I found Hyang-ga written by language of Silla in Samkukyusa where he contacted with for school days and quoted the interpretation method of the language of in the Japan ancient times and have begun to interpret this. However, slip-ups in the vocabulary appeared in the slip-up in the kanji use, decoding of the meaning interruption, usage a lot, but Yang was the researcher who it was the best, and got over a bad point of such Ogura. There was not the concrete reference of Ogura for such a result after all. The handwriting memo which the writer found in a donation book of Ogura surely proves such a fact. Ogura quoted it with a book and the document of the more than 30 class and touched a memo to in total 69 places. I should have made this for the purpose that was going to make up for the imperfect point of the original work. I postponed the analysis of the detailed Ogura study using this memo in the share of the associated researcher and confirmed it whether I was concerned with the point of argument of at first this sentence, and there was a reference about Yang. As a result, there was not it, but received a feeling that he avoided an article of Yang which collimated problems of the Ogura decoding in the front somehow.