본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Educational Implications of Report Cards in the Accountability Policy of the No Child Left Behind Act

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The great promise of public school system is to have equal access to an education that allows students to enjoy the freedom and exercise the responsibilities of citizenship in democracy. The purpose of this study is to give careful consideration to the strong and weak points of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act in the United States in order to give a keen insight to Korean education with the same problems like the American one. This study points out that the idea of the NCLB act turned out to entail some sort of privatization about our schools through the accountability policy. It also indicates that education is gradually transferred to the marketplace and the bottom line in education in the principles of the NCLB act is not what benefits students but what produces profit.

Abstract

The great promise of public school system is to have equal access to an education that allows students to enjoy the freedom and exercise the responsibilities of citizenship in democracy. The purpose of this study is to give careful consideration to the strong and weak points of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act in the United States in order to give a keen insight to Korean education with the same problems like the American one. This study points out that the idea of the NCLB act turned out to entail some sort of privatization about our schools through the accountability policy. It also indicates that education is gradually transferred to the marketplace and the bottom line in education in the principles of the NCLB act is not what benefits students but what produces profit.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Apple, M, "Controlling the work of teachers, In The curriculum studies reader", pp.183~197 (2004), Routledge Falmer
  2. Baptiste, H. P., "History of racism: social, political, and psychological perspectives on modernity, In Educators healing racism", pp.19~46 (1999), Association of Teacher Educators
  3. Cohen-Vogel, L, "Integrating accountability with choice: Implications for school governance", Peabody Journal of Education, 78(4), pp.4~28 (2004)
  4. Fusarelli, L. D, "The political construction of accountability when rhetoric meets reality", Education and Urban Society, 33(2), pp.157~169 (2001)
  5. Fusarelli, L. D, "The potential impact of the No Child Left Behind act on equity and diversity in American education", Educational Policy, 18(1), pp.71~74 (2004)
  6. Goldhaber, D, "What might go wrong with the accountability measures of the “No Child Left Behind Act”", conference of 2002 “Will No Child Truly be Left Behind? The Challenges of Making This Law Work” (2002)
  7. Hernandez-Murillo, R., "Tough lesson: More money doesn’t help schools accountability", The Regional Economist, 2, pp.12~13 (2004)
  8. Jacob, B. A., "To catch a cheat. How to stop testing fraud", A Journal of Opinion and Research, 4(1), pp.68~75 (2004)
  9. Linn, R. L., "Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind act 2001", Educational Researcher, 31(6), pp.3~16 (2002)
  10. Macedo, D, "Literacy for Stupidification: The pedagogy of big lies, In Multicultural education, critical pedagogy and the politics of difference", pp.98~125 (1995), State University of New York Press
  11. "All other bring data" (2003)[URL]
  12. Meier, D., "Many children left behind" (2004), Beacon Press
  13. "Mr. Gates goes to Washington" (2005)[URL]
  14. Ravitch, D, "Recycling Reforms: The departments of education enters the innovation business", A Journal of Opinion and Research, 4(1), pp.35~40 (2004)
  15. St. John, M, "Why curriculum? Paper", NSF K-12 mathematics and science curricula and implementation centers (2002)
  16. Sunderman, G. L., "Expansion of federal power in American education: Federal-state relationships under No Child Left Behind act, year one" (2004), The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University
  17. "Preliminary overview of programs and changes included in the No Child Left Behind act 2001" (2002)[URL]
  18. U.S. Department of Education, "Report cards title I, part A. non- regulatory guidance" (2003), Education Publication Center
  19. U.S. Department of Education, "A guide to education and No Child Left Behind" (2004), Education Publication Center
  20. Gene Vasilopoulos, "English and Self-Identity Construction among Korean Learners: A Qualitative Study", 외국어교육연구, 24(2), pp.101~126 (2010), 외국어교육연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)