Different Licensing between VP-deletion and Be/Have(Aux)P-deletion Based on the VP-shell Structure
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this paper is to suggest different licensing between the VP-deletion and Be/Have(Aux)P-deletion, analyzing the deleted part rather than the remaining left element. The deleted parts sometimes show different morphological forms. I will argue that this aspect must be reflected in the syntactic licensing property for the VP-deletion. Bare forms of main verbs need not to move in the scope of the deletion. VP-deletion including a bare form of a main verb will occur under identity with its antecedent. While, the inflected forms of main verbs must move to the affixal light verb. The VP-deletion including an inflected form will occur under identity with its antecedent before Agree after the movement to the light verb. Be/Have as an Aux seems to originate under the Aux. The phrase including Be/Have is licensed by the functional category ‘T’, rather than υ*(υ). Be/Have is derived from the lexicon as the complex of features like main verbs. The AuxP-deletion must occur after Agree under identity with the antecedent.
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to suggest different licensing between the VP-deletion and Be/Have(Aux)P-deletion, analyzing the deleted part rather than the remaining left element. The deleted parts sometimes show different morphological forms. I will argue that this aspect must be reflected in the syntactic licensing property for the VP-deletion. Bare forms of main verbs need not to move in the scope of the deletion. VP-deletion including a bare form of a main verb will occur under identity with its antecedent. While, the inflected forms of main verbs must move to the affixal light verb. The VP-deletion including an inflected form will occur under identity with its antecedent before Agree after the movement to the light verb. Be/Have as an Aux seems to originate under the Aux. The phrase including Be/Have is licensed by the functional category ‘T’, rather than υ*(υ). Be/Have is derived from the lexicon as the complex of features like main verbs. The AuxP-deletion must occur after Agree under identity with the antecedent.
참고문헌 (26)
- Chomsky, N, "Syntax structures" (1957), Mouton
- Chomsky, N, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N, "Knowledge of language.New" (1986), Praeger
- Chomsky, N, "A minimalist program for linguistic theory, In The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Categories and transformations, In The minimalist program", pp.219~394 (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Minimalist inquiries: The framework", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15, pp.1~56 (1998)
- Chomsky, N, "Derivation by phase", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18, pp.1~43 (1999)
- Beyond explanatory adequacy, "Chomsky, N", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 1~28 (2001)
- Chomsky, N., "The theory of principles and parameters, In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
- Halle, M., "Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection, In The view from building", pp.111~176 (1993), MIT Press
- Jackendoff, R, "Gapping and related rules", Linguistic Inquiry, 2, pp.21~35 (1971)
- Johnson, K, "What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why, In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory", pp.439~479 (2001), Blackwell Publishers
- Laka, I, "Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and Projections", 박사, pp.1990
- Lasnik, H, "Restricting the theory of transformations: A case study, In Explanations in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition", pp.152~173 (1981), Longmans
- A note on pseudogapping, "Lasnik, H", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 143~163 (1995)
- Lasnik, H, "Verbal morphology: Syntactic structures meets the minimalist program, In Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlos Otero", pp.251~275 (1995), Georgetown University Press
- Lobeck, A, "VP ellipsis in infinitives: Infl as a proper governor", NELS, pp.425~441 (1987), GLSA
- Lobeck, A, "Licensing and identification of ellipted categories in English", Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop (1992), Stuttgart
- Lobeck, A, "Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing and identification" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Lopez, L, "The syntactic licensing of VP-ellipsis: A comparative study of Spanish and English, In Issues and theory in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the linguistic symposium on Romance languages, XXIII", pp.333~354 (1994), Georgetown University Press
- May, R, "Logical form: Its structure and derivation" (1985), MIT Press
- Quirk, R., "A grammar of contemporary English" (1972), Longman Press
- Sag, I, "Deletion and logical form", 박사, pp.1976
- Warner, A, "Ellipsis conditions and the status of the English copula", York Papers in Linguistics, 12, pp.153~72 (1986)
- Wasow, T, "Anaphoric relations in English", 박사, Institute of Technology, Massachusetts., pp.1972
- Williams, E. S, "Discourse and logical form", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.101~139 (1977)