본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

How Does Peer Feedback Training Work in EFL Writing?

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Peer feedback, in which students work together in pairs or small groups to critique and provide comments on one another's writing, is compatible with communicative approaches to second language acquisition(SLA) and process approaches to foreign language writing. This study, drawing on Vygotsky's sociocultural learning theory, conducted a pretest-posttest comparison group quasi-experimental design with multiple data being collected and analyzed quantitatively by using SPSSWID (ver. 17.0), to explore what role trained peer feedback plays in EFL writing context. Results of a series of t-tests, in quantative analysis showed that peer feedback training had positive effects on participants in various aspects. The experimental group students gained more than control group students in terms of comment quantity and quality, expecially generating more specific and relevant comments on global issues and implementing more peer comments into their revisions. Peer feedback training also helped students cultivate more positive attitudes towards EFL writing. These findings suggest that peer feedback trainig has shown strong positive effects on EFL learners, that is, EFL students can perform peer feedback both efficiently and effectively as long as they are well-trained.

Abstract

Peer feedback, in which students work together in pairs or small groups to critique and provide comments on one another's writing, is compatible with communicative approaches to second language acquisition(SLA) and process approaches to foreign language writing. This study, drawing on Vygotsky's sociocultural learning theory, conducted a pretest-posttest comparison group quasi-experimental design with multiple data being collected and analyzed quantitatively by using SPSSWID (ver. 17.0), to explore what role trained peer feedback plays in EFL writing context. Results of a series of t-tests, in quantative analysis showed that peer feedback training had positive effects on participants in various aspects. The experimental group students gained more than control group students in terms of comment quantity and quality, expecially generating more specific and relevant comments on global issues and implementing more peer comments into their revisions. Peer feedback training also helped students cultivate more positive attitudes towards EFL writing. These findings suggest that peer feedback trainig has shown strong positive effects on EFL learners, that is, EFL students can perform peer feedback both efficiently and effectively as long as they are well-trained.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Ashwell, T., "Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple‐draft composition class: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), pp.227~257 (2000)
  2. Berg, E. C., "The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.215~241 (1999)
  3. Bridwell, L. S., "Revising strategies in Twelfth grade students’ transactional writing", Research In the Teaching of English, 14, pp.197~222 (1980)
  4. Carson, J. G., "Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), pp.1~19 (1996)
  5. Connor, U., "Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much effect on revision?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, pp.257~276 (1994)
  6. Donato, R., "The dialogic origins of L2 monitoring", Pragmatics and Language Learning, 1, pp.83~98 (1990)
  7. Ellis, R., "The study of second language acquisition" (1994), Oxford University Press
  8. Faigley, L., "Analyzing revision", Computers and Composition, 32(4), pp.400~414 (1981)
  9. Ferris, D. R, "Response to student writing" (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum
  10. Gere, A. R., "Writing groups: History, theory and implications" (1987), Southern Illinois University Press
  11. Gere, A., "Talking about writing: The language of writing groups", Research in the teaching of English, 19, pp.362~385 (1985)
  12. Hanjani, A. M., "Exploring L2 writers' collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance", System, 44(2), pp.101~114 (2014)
  13. Jacobs, G. M., "Feedback on student writing:Taking in the middle path", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), pp.307~317 (1998)
  14. Leki, I., "Potential problems with peer responding with ESL writing classes", CATESOL Journal, 3, pp.5~19 (1990)
  15. Leki, I., "The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college‐level writing classes", Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), pp.203~218 (1991)
  16. Liu, J., "Peer response in second language writing Classroom" (2002), The University of Michigan Press
  17. McGaorty, M. E., "Triangulation in classroom research: A study of peer revision", Language Learning, 47(1), pp.1~43 (1997)
  18. Mendonça, C. O., "Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), pp.745~769 (1994)
  19. Min, H. T., "Training students to become successful peer reviewers", System, 33(2), pp.293~308 (2005)
  20. Min, H. T., "The effects of training peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), pp.118~141 (2006)
  21. Min, H. T., "Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training", English for Specific Purposes, 27, pp.285~305 (2008)
  22. Mittan, R., "Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students", pp.207~219 (1989), Longman
  23. Nelson, G. L., "ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), pp.113~131 (1998)
  24. Paulus, T. M., "The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.265~289 (1999)
  25. Rollinson. P, "Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.23~30 (2005)
  26. Sengupta, S., "Peer evaluation: ‘I am not the teacher’", ELT Journal, 52(1), pp.19~28 (1998)
  27. Spear, K., "Sharing writing: Peer response groups in English classes" (1988), Boynton Cook Publishers
  28. Stanley, J., "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, pp.217~233 (1992)
  29. Shehadeh, A., "Effects and student perception of collaborative writing in L2", Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, pp.286~305 (2011)
  30. Sommer, N., "Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers", College Composition and Communication, 31, pp.378~388 (1980)
  31. Tsui, A. B. M., "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
  32. Villamil, O. S., "Assessing the effect of peer revision on L2 writing", Applied Linguistics, 19(4), pp.491~514 (1998)
  33. Vygotsky, Lev., "Thought and language" (1986), The MIT Press
  34. Yang, M., "A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), pp.179~200 (2006)
  35. Yin Ling Cheung., "Critical feedback on peer review research", Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp.535~538 (2011)
  36. Zhang, S., "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)
  37. Zhu, W., "Effects of training for peer response on students' comments and interaction", Written Communication, 12(4), pp.492~528 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)