본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

구조주의적 주체 인식의 문제 - 서정인의 초기 소설을 대상으로

A Study on the Cognition of Structuralist Subject

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

It is the conclusion of this research that the early novels, written by Seo Jung-in, could obtain its certain understanding through the ‘structuralism’. It is not saying that text can be deciphered by the method of structuralism study. In the early novels of Seo Jung-in, it has obvious tendency on cognition which can be called ‘Structuralist’. It would be so if it were limited to the problem of subject. The early novels of him can be categorized by two when seeing from the view point of Cognition of Structuralist Subject. If the tendency which inquires the possibility of escape is one aspect, the other aspect is the remarkable tendency including the negation to free will of the subject and permission of limitation. What does the subject really can do? An inquiry about the way of existence of subject and its possibility is a consistent problem of the writers. Indeed, Seo Jung-in’s novels kept showing its certain responses about those problems. Skepticism and negation of subject’s free will toward the step of expending its extension in variety variations. Suppose that thought of limitation, destiny of pessimism, interest about the area which is out of control from the subject’s consciousness are those steps. Those main characters who embody these realms, however, mostly cannot be the master of their fate. One of the core doctrines of modernity is the notion of subject based on free will. Consequently, it is the logical conclusion that negation of this subject could be lead to the historical denial or political renunciation. The subject cannot be motivated at all once whose free will is denied. If the narrative of deeds by free will should be scanty in a novel, the way out of realm of the novel would be given to staying in constant situation. The characters in Seo Jung-in’s novel lost their will while accepting these limitations of destiny. However, there is a problem at the point where the subject's free will is deleted is the scene where human is erased and dissolved to the nature. A question about awareness of the subject of Seo Jung-in is full of suggestions regarding to discern the way of novels hereafter.

Abstract

It is the conclusion of this research that the early novels, written by Seo Jung-in, could obtain its certain understanding through the ‘structuralism’. It is not saying that text can be deciphered by the method of structuralism study. In the early novels of Seo Jung-in, it has obvious tendency on cognition which can be called ‘Structuralist’. It would be so if it were limited to the problem of subject. The early novels of him can be categorized by two when seeing from the view point of Cognition of Structuralist Subject. If the tendency which inquires the possibility of escape is one aspect, the other aspect is the remarkable tendency including the negation to free will of the subject and permission of limitation. What does the subject really can do? An inquiry about the way of existence of subject and its possibility is a consistent problem of the writers. Indeed, Seo Jung-in’s novels kept showing its certain responses about those problems. Skepticism and negation of subject’s free will toward the step of expending its extension in variety variations. Suppose that thought of limitation, destiny of pessimism, interest about the area which is out of control from the subject’s consciousness are those steps. Those main characters who embody these realms, however, mostly cannot be the master of their fate. One of the core doctrines of modernity is the notion of subject based on free will. Consequently, it is the logical conclusion that negation of this subject could be lead to the historical denial or political renunciation. The subject cannot be motivated at all once whose free will is denied. If the narrative of deeds by free will should be scanty in a novel, the way out of realm of the novel would be given to staying in constant situation. The characters in Seo Jung-in’s novel lost their will while accepting these limitations of destiny. However, there is a problem at the point where the subject's free will is deleted is the scene where human is erased and dissolved to the nature. A question about awareness of the subject of Seo Jung-in is full of suggestions regarding to discern the way of novels hereafter.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 서정인, "강" (1996), 문학과지성사
  2. 서정인, "철쭉제 외" (1995), 동아출판사
  3. 서정인, "물치" (1996), 솔
  4. 김미현, "‘말’과 ‘삶’의 이중적 글쓰기 in : 화갑기념 논문집" (1993), 창
  5. 김성기, "철학 바깥에서 본 ‘현대 프랑스 철학’ in : 프랑스 철학과 우리1" (1997), 당대
  6. 김현, "세계 인식의 변모와 의미(해설) in : 강" (1976), 문학과지성사
  7. 김형효, "구조주의의 사유체계와 사상" (1990), 인간사랑
  8. 오양진, "순수한 시선의 의미-서정인 초기 소설의 비인간화 징후에 대하여-", 민족문화연구, (40), pp.213~238 (2004), 민족문화연구원
  9. 유종호, "삭막한 삶과 압축의 미학(해설) in : 철쭉제" (1986), 민음사
  10. 윤효녕, "주체 개념의 비판" (1999), 서울대학교 출판부
  11. 이남호, "6,70년대 張三李四들의 삶", 작가세계 (1994)
  12. 이수형, "서정인 초기 소설에 나타난 주체의 타율성과 책임의 관련 양상", 한국학논집, (34), pp.111~140 (2007), 한국학연구원
  13. 이진경, "탈주의 공간을 위하여" (1997), 푸른숲
  14. 정명환, "주체(主體)의 변모(變貌)", 문학동네 (1999)
  15. 정혜경, "1960년대 소설의 서술구조 연구", 박사, pp.2001
  16. 정호웅, "타락한 세계에 대한 비판적 진단", 작가세계 (1994)
  17. 조가경, "실존철학" (1991), 박영사
  18. 최혜실, "서정인론:일상의 반복과 원점회귀의 형식을 중심으로", 비평문학, (9) (1995), ,
  19. 황종연, "문학의 옹호", 문학동네 (2001)
  20. 들뢰즈, "구조주의를 어떻게 식별할 것인가 in : 의미의 논리" (1999), 한길사
  21. 딜런 에반스, "딜런 에반스" (1998), 인간사랑
  22. 레비스트로스, "슬픈 열대" (1990), 삼성출판사
  23. 마르트 로베르, "소설의 기원, 기원의 소설" (1999), 문학과지성사
  24. 미셀 푸코, "말과 사물" (1986), 민음사
  25. 벵쌍 데꽁브, "동일자와 타자" (1990), 인간사랑
  26. 아사다 아키라, "구조주의와 포스트구조주의" (1995), 새길
  27. 장 폴 사르트르, "실존주의는 휴머니즘이다" (1996), 문예출판사
  28. 크리스티앙 데캉, "오늘의 프랑스 철학사상" (1991), 책세상
  29. 하이네만, "실존철학" (1983), 문예출판사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)