사건, 사유 그리고 웃음의 함수 관계 - Friday를 중심으로
The Functional Relation of Event, Thought and Smile - in the study of Friday
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It was a disaster when Robinson was wrecked into the desert island. The island was a society where no civilization is existed by human beings. The processes that Robinson had lived was like the story of salvation or the new world where mankind can live happily but which just excites human's curiosity. With his knowledge he thought that there were no men which drew him into the problem of others. Something that happened on an island was the accident that conceptualized another one or conflicted this with that to know what was the problem. We know that the concept of the incident was not represented implicitly from the story. And we have already recognized that the story of Robinson Crusoe had the same incident but differently from Tournier's Friday. In a sense Robinson had to change his situation regarding to the problem of being with Friday. But this is the theme where Robinson had another story line in an incomplete society. At last his life style and balance of living with Friday broke only to make his readers laugh. This thesis has a point to concentrate themes on Deleuze and Bergson's philosophical position. It is an effect because we know their expectation. But when the scene and the story were fit for the interest of them the incidents changed into the twisted story at the same time. There are many actions we can not cause them to understand the logical explanation. These are the creative instrumental tools someday somebody makes another story line in their novels. In Deleuze's philosophy, there has always been regarded as a very delicate problem for all presuppositions. These presuppositions are as much subjective as objective. Here this thesis tries to know that how by objective presuppositions we can get understood the concepts explicitly presupposed by a given incident. According to this hypothesis we understand that the true philosophical difference is in-itself already repetition between the relation of Robinson and Friday in Friday. Again the event is not what occurs an accident. It is rather inside what occurs as an incident purely expressed in a relation. Event gives us signal and awaits us. Event is that we must understand what happened in it. And the actor represents, but what he represents is always in the future and already in the past, whereas his representation is impassible and divided, unfolded without being ruptured, neither acting nor being acted upon. Anyway Friday actualizes the event, but in a way which is entirely different from the actualization of the event with the functional relation.
Abstract
It was a disaster when Robinson was wrecked into the desert island. The island was a society where no civilization is existed by human beings. The processes that Robinson had lived was like the story of salvation or the new world where mankind can live happily but which just excites human's curiosity. With his knowledge he thought that there were no men which drew him into the problem of others. Something that happened on an island was the accident that conceptualized another one or conflicted this with that to know what was the problem. We know that the concept of the incident was not represented implicitly from the story. And we have already recognized that the story of Robinson Crusoe had the same incident but differently from Tournier's Friday. In a sense Robinson had to change his situation regarding to the problem of being with Friday. But this is the theme where Robinson had another story line in an incomplete society. At last his life style and balance of living with Friday broke only to make his readers laugh. This thesis has a point to concentrate themes on Deleuze and Bergson's philosophical position. It is an effect because we know their expectation. But when the scene and the story were fit for the interest of them the incidents changed into the twisted story at the same time. There are many actions we can not cause them to understand the logical explanation. These are the creative instrumental tools someday somebody makes another story line in their novels. In Deleuze's philosophy, there has always been regarded as a very delicate problem for all presuppositions. These presuppositions are as much subjective as objective. Here this thesis tries to know that how by objective presuppositions we can get understood the concepts explicitly presupposed by a given incident. According to this hypothesis we understand that the true philosophical difference is in-itself already repetition between the relation of Robinson and Friday in Friday. Again the event is not what occurs an accident. It is rather inside what occurs as an incident purely expressed in a relation. Event gives us signal and awaits us. Event is that we must understand what happened in it. And the actor represents, but what he represents is always in the future and already in the past, whereas his representation is impassible and divided, unfolded without being ruptured, neither acting nor being acted upon. Anyway Friday actualizes the event, but in a way which is entirely different from the actualization of the event with the functional relation.
참고문헌 (26)
- 이정우, "시뮬라크르의 시대:들뢰즈와 사건의 철학" (1999), 거름
- 이진경, "노마디즘" (2003), 휴머니스트
- 임레 라카토시, "수학, 과학 그리고 인식론" (1996), 민음사
- 힐러리 퍼트남, "표상과 실재" (1988), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- "Laughter"[URL]
- Cowart,D, "Literary Symbiosis" (1993), The University of Georgia Press
- Davis,C, "Michael Tournier: Philosophy and Fiction" (1988), Clarendon Press
- Defoe, D, "Robinson Crusoe" (1994), Norton
- Deleuze, Gilles, "The Logic of Sense" (1990), Columbia UP
- David Lapoujade, "Desert Islands and Other Texts 1953-1974. ed", pp.1974, Deleuze, Gilles
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Difference and Repetition" (1994), Columbia UP
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Anti-Oedipus" (1983), University of Minnesota Press
- Deleuze, Gilles, "A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia" (1991), University of Minnesota Press
- Green,M, "The Robinson Crusoe Story" (1990), Pennsylvania State UP
- Gilden, C, "The Life and Strange Surprising Adventures of Mr. D...De F..., of London" (1972), Routledge
- Macherey, P, "A Theory of Literary Production" (1978), Routledge
- Marx,K, "Capital" (1906), Modern Library
- McKeon, M, "The Origins of the English Novel 1600-1740", The John Hopkins UP
- Rajchman,J, "The Deleuze Connections" (2001), The MIT Press
- Rogers,P, "Daniel Defoe: The Critical Heritage" (1995), Routledge
- Ronen,R, "Possible worlds in literary theory" (1994), Cambridge UP
- Rousseau,J, "Emile or On Education" (2007), Nuvision
- Russell,B, "The Problems of Philosophy" (1980), Oxford UP
- Sutherland,J, "Defoe" (1950), Methuen & Co
- Tournier, M, "Friday" (1997), The Johns Hopkins UP
- Watt,I, "The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding" (1957), University of California Press