본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대중국 지식인의 번역관 - 魯迅, 嚴復, 梁啓超를 중심으로

The Translation Methodology of the Intellectuals in Modern China: Focused on Lu Xun, Yan Fu and Liang Qichao

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

There was a translation boom in modern China's history, which began at the last stage of the Qing Dynasty, and continued to the May Fourth new culture movement. During this period, so many Chinese intellectuals devoted themselves to the translation work that the old China in danger could see hope again, and find a new way which would not only promote language, literature and culture, but also reform the political and economic systems. In this essay I focused on Lu Xun, Yan Fu and Liang Qichao, who presented the most important translation methodologies in this period, took their ideologies as a whole organization, using the method of comparison. By considering the process that the translation ideologies were built up and changed in this way, we can find the relationships and differences among their methodologies, also the new valuation to the translation ideologies and methodologies will be possible. The research of translation should be taken from a historical premise because translation is decisively related to the times and society. That means we couldn't simplify the appraising problem of these translation methodologies. From the ideology called "political novels translation" by Liang Qichao, to the methodology about "Faithfulness(信), Smoothness(达), Elegance(雅)" by Yan Fu, and also to the persistence of Lu Xun in his "hard translation(Yingyi 硬译)" method, all of these methodologies were the results selected in order to respond to the historical request. At the same time we can also find evidences which indicate the translators' great pains over their work, and their serious speculations about a lot of important questions like national culture and cultural other, utilitarian translation and ethical translation, reader and original work, and so on. For these reasons, the methodologies presented by Lu Xun, Yan Fu and Liang Qichao are all worthwhile. They have built up an organization in a way of influencing each others and being dependent on each others, supplementing with each others and fusing together.

Abstract

There was a translation boom in modern China's history, which began at the last stage of the Qing Dynasty, and continued to the May Fourth new culture movement. During this period, so many Chinese intellectuals devoted themselves to the translation work that the old China in danger could see hope again, and find a new way which would not only promote language, literature and culture, but also reform the political and economic systems. In this essay I focused on Lu Xun, Yan Fu and Liang Qichao, who presented the most important translation methodologies in this period, took their ideologies as a whole organization, using the method of comparison. By considering the process that the translation ideologies were built up and changed in this way, we can find the relationships and differences among their methodologies, also the new valuation to the translation ideologies and methodologies will be possible. The research of translation should be taken from a historical premise because translation is decisively related to the times and society. That means we couldn't simplify the appraising problem of these translation methodologies. From the ideology called "political novels translation" by Liang Qichao, to the methodology about "Faithfulness(信), Smoothness(达), Elegance(雅)" by Yan Fu, and also to the persistence of Lu Xun in his "hard translation(Yingyi 硬译)" method, all of these methodologies were the results selected in order to respond to the historical request. At the same time we can also find evidences which indicate the translators' great pains over their work, and their serious speculations about a lot of important questions like national culture and cultural other, utilitarian translation and ethical translation, reader and original work, and so on. For these reasons, the methodologies presented by Lu Xun, Yan Fu and Liang Qichao are all worthwhile. They have built up an organization in a way of influencing each others and being dependent on each others, supplementing with each others and fusing together.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 梁啓超, "飜譯文學之影響於一般文學,in 梁啓超講國學" (2008), 吉林人民出版社
  2. 梁啓超, "論進步,in 洪治綱, 梁啓超經典文存" (2003), 上海大學出版社
  3. 梁啓超, "論譯書, 徐中玉, 中國近代文學大系·文學理論集(2)" (1995), 上海書店
  4. 梁啓超, "譯學進步之影, 梁啓超講國學" (2008), 吉林人民出版社
  5. 梁啓超, "飮氷室自由書, 淸議報", 第二十六冊, ~
  6. 魯迅, "訥喊·自序, 魯迅全集 第一券" (1981), 人民文學出版社
  7. 魯迅, "二心集·關於飜譯的通信, 魯迅全集 第四卷" (1981), 人民文學出版社
  8. 魯迅, "二心集·畿條“順”的飜譯, 魯迅全集 第四卷" (1981), 人文文學出版社
  9. 魯迅, "二心集·“硬譯”輿“文學的階級性”, 魯迅全集 第四卷" (1981), 人民文學出版社
  10. 魯迅, "墳·摩羅詩力說, 魯迅全集 第一券" (1981), 人民文學出版社
  11. 魯迅, "且介亭雜文二集·“題未定”草(二), 魯迅全集 第六卷" (1981), 人民文學出版社
  12. 魯迅, "譯文序跋集·域外小說集」序言, 魯迅全集 第十卷" (1981), 人民文學出版社
  13. 魯迅, "域外小說集序言, 譯文序跋集" (2006), 人民文學出版社
  14. 嚴復, "京師大學堂譯書章程, 嚴復集(一)" (1986), 中華書局
  15. 嚴復, "天演論 譯例言, 嚴復文選" (2006), 百花文藝出版社
  16. 陳夢熊, "關於魯迅譯述 哀塵, 造人述 的考說, 魯迅全集中的人和事--魯迅佚文佚事考釋" (2004), 上海社會科學院出版社
  17. 崔峰, "魯迅飜譯初探", 석사, pp.2006
  18. 季羨林, "季羨林談飜譯" (2007), 當代中國出版社
  19. 蠡勺居士, "昕夕閑談 小序」, 徐中玉, 中國近代文學大系·文學理論集(2)" (1995), 上海書店
  20. 羅新璋, "我國自成體系的飜譯理論, 飜譯論集" (1984), 商務印書館
  21. 施蜇存, "中國近代文學大系·飜譯文學集: 1840-1919" (1991), 上海書店
  22. 王宏志, "一本《晩淸飜譯史》的構思", pp.2~ (2001), 中國比較文學
  23. 徐志嘯, "近代中外文學關係" (2000), 華東師範大學出版社
  24. 鄭意長, "近代飜譯思想之演進及其現代闡釋", 박사, pp.2009
  25. 周作人, "文學改良與孔敎", 新靑年, 5(6)
  26. 周作人, "雨天的書·我的復古的經驗" (2002), 河北敎育出版社
  27. Venuti, L, "Rethinking Translation: Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology" (1992), Routledge
  28. 李寶暻, "동서문명의 遭遇와 근대 중국 지식인의 번역관", 중국현대문학, (22)
  29. 조재룡, "동서양의 문화 번역론 비교 연구 - 루쉰(魯迅)과 베르만(A. Berman), 베르만과 루쉰", 비교문학, (48), pp.5~32 (2009), 한국비교문학회
  30. 조재룡, "번역시의 귀납적 양감과 그 친화력에 대하여 - ‘운문’의 ‘운문’으로의 번역은 가능한가", 현대시, (2월) (2011), 한국민연

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)