옌푸(嚴復)의 번역이론 ‘아(雅)’에 대한 논의를 통해 본 번역론
The Analysis of “Ah(雅)”, Translation Theory of Yan Fu
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to disclose the meaning of “Ah(雅), the translation theory of Yan Fu,” which has come under intense scrutiny in academia. Yan Fu, a scholar of ancient literary writings of Dong Sung School, was a translator of modern Western studies and translation theorist. Shindalah (信達雅), the translation theory of Yan Fu, has been the focus of academic debate since Tang Dynasty. It is a unique theory of translation built on the three principles of translation advocated by Taylor. Whereas Taylor set great store by the loyalty to the original text, Yan Fu emphasized readability, arguing that deviation from the original text is possible if it helps to convey the original meaning. Yan Fu said that Ah(雅) is about rendering the Western literature, product of two thousand years of discrete culture into oriental language. Students of his theory have held the view that Ah is more important than “Shin(信, faithfulness)”and “Dal(達, mastery).” They thought that translator should have a full grasp of the original text before rendering in an easy-to-comprehend manner to the readers, which requires capability, efforts and creativity of the translators. Yan Fu classified the degree of understanding of the original text into superficial, general and fundamental understanding and the level of translated version into a level produced by best efforts, a level enough to convey the original meaning to the readers and a level that can have an extensive impact on the wide strata of readers. Ah is a level that befits the translation born of deep understanding of the original so that it can have an impact on wide strata of readers.
Abstract
This paper is to disclose the meaning of “Ah(雅), the translation theory of Yan Fu,” which has come under intense scrutiny in academia. Yan Fu, a scholar of ancient literary writings of Dong Sung School, was a translator of modern Western studies and translation theorist. Shindalah (信達雅), the translation theory of Yan Fu, has been the focus of academic debate since Tang Dynasty. It is a unique theory of translation built on the three principles of translation advocated by Taylor. Whereas Taylor set great store by the loyalty to the original text, Yan Fu emphasized readability, arguing that deviation from the original text is possible if it helps to convey the original meaning. Yan Fu said that Ah(雅) is about rendering the Western literature, product of two thousand years of discrete culture into oriental language. Students of his theory have held the view that Ah is more important than “Shin(信, faithfulness)”and “Dal(達, mastery).” They thought that translator should have a full grasp of the original text before rendering in an easy-to-comprehend manner to the readers, which requires capability, efforts and creativity of the translators. Yan Fu classified the degree of understanding of the original text into superficial, general and fundamental understanding and the level of translated version into a level produced by best efforts, a level enough to convey the original meaning to the readers and a level that can have an extensive impact on the wide strata of readers. Ah is a level that befits the translation born of deep understanding of the original so that it can have an impact on wide strata of readers.
참고문헌 (63)
- 김종윤, "嚴復의 전통 인식 및 서학 수용의 태도", 중국학보, 37 (1997)
- 김종윤, "천연론 논석", 전주사학, 5 (1997)
- 김효중, "새로운 번역을 위한 패러다임" (2004), 푸른사상
- "네이버 국어사전"[URL]
- 리디아 리우, "언어횡단적 실천" (2005), 소명출판
- 박영철, "嚴復의 몽테스키외 번역과 중국의 근대화", 역사교육, (92), pp.197~224 (2004), 역사교육연구회
- 백광준, "엄복의 번역어 탄생과 그 운명", 중국어문학, 48(48), pp.441~462 (2006), 영남중국어문학회
- 성백효, "毛序, In 詩經集傳", pp.30~ (1993), 전통문화연구회
- 손지봉, "서양의 번역문화범주 이론에 대한 중국의 대응과 그 의미", 중국어문학지, (21), pp.389~414 (2006), 중국어문학회
- 손지봉, "번역과 문화전파", 중국어문학지, (24), pp.345~364 (2007), 중국어문학회
- 손지봉, "郭沫若의 번역론 연구", 중국어문학지, (28), pp.183~204 (2008), 중국어문학회
- 손지봉, "林語堂 번역론 연구", 중국학보, (62), pp.173~189 (2010), 한국중국학회
- 손지봉, "傅雷의 번역관 고찰", 중국학연구, (52), pp.163~183 (2010), 중국학연구회
- 손지봉, "중국의 번역론에 대한 전통문학론의 영향 고찰 -嚴復, 郭沫若, 林語堂, 錢鍾書-", 통번역교육연구, 8(2), pp.133~149 (2010), 한국통번역교육학회
- 신희원, "嚴復 연구-그 생애와 사상-", 이대사원, 9 (1970)
- 양일모, "번역의 사상사-康有爲와 嚴復", 중국학보, 40 (1999)
- 양일모, "옌푸(嚴復), 중국의 근대성과 서양사상" (2008), 태학사
- 양일모, "자유의 조건 : 엄복의 『원부』, 『군기권계론』, 『정치 강의』 분석", 중국학보, 60(60), pp.465~485 (2009), 한국중국학회
- 왕성, "근대중국 지식인의 번역관 - 魯迅, 嚴復, 梁啓超를 중심으로", 비교문학, (55), pp.231~251 (2011), 한국비교문학회
- 이보경, "동서문명의 조우(遭遇)와 근대 중국 지식인의 번역관", 중국현대문학, (22), pp.515~548 (2002), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 조병한, "19세기 후반 중일의 계몽사상: 嚴復과 福澤諭吉", 진단학보, 89 (2000)
- 페데리코 마시니, "근대 중국의 언어와 문자" (2005), 소명출판
- 高惠群, "烏傳翻譯家嚴復傳論" (1992), 上海外語敎育出版社
- 郭宏安, "自設藩籬 循跡而行", 中華讀書報 (1996)
- 金兵, "對嚴復飜譯標準的再認識", 中國鑛業大學學報(社會科學版) (2005)
- 馬祖毅, "中國飜譯簡史-五四以前部分", pp.261~ (1984), 中國對外飜譯出版公司
- 木曾, "飜譯釋義, In 『飜譯硏究論文集』上冊", pp.369~ (1941)
- 苗莉莉, "嚴復的飜譯實踐原則-飜譯辨證系統觀和目的論角度的探討", 魯東大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 26(1) (2009)
- 卞之琳, "藝術性飜譯問題和詩歌飜譯問 題", 飜譯論集, 654 (1959)
- 西北工業大學外語敎硏室, "科技英語飜譯初步" (1979), 商務印書館
- 徐守平, "雅義小論-重讀 天演論 譯例言", 中國飜譯 (1994)
- 葉君健, "飜譯也要出精品", 中國飜譯 (1997)
- 沈蘇儒, "論信達雅-嚴復飜譯理論硏究" (1998), 商務印書館
- 顔德如, "嚴復飜譯思想新探", 福建論壇, 人文社會科學版, (6) (2005)
- 梁啓超, "論譯書, In 飜譯通信, 飜譯硏究論文集(1894-1948)" (1896), 外語敎學與硏究
- 鄢紅梅, "嚴復飜譯思想宗述", 井岡山學院學報(哲學社會科學), 29 (2008)
- 嚴復, "天演論·譯例言", ~ (1898)
- 倪慶餼, "嚴復的飜譯理論與實踐", 天津師院學報, (2) (1982)
- 吳獻書, "英文漢譯的理論與實際 제4판", pp.5~6 (1949), 開明書店
- 王宏志, "重釋 “信達雅”-20世紀中國飜譯硏究" (2007), 淸華大學出版社
- 王言, "論嚴復飜譯原則中的“雅”", 湖北經濟學院學報(人文社會科學版), 8(4) (2011)
- 外文出版社, "關於飜譯工作的幾個問題, In 對外報導業務基礎 增訂版", pp.224~225 (1962), 今日中國出版社
- 姚鼐, "复鲁絜非书, In 惜抱轩文集" (1979), 文海出版社有限公司
- 劉重德, "渾金璞玉集 飜譯原則再講", pp.10~ (1993), 中國對外飜譯出版公司
- 劉治, "論嚴復飜譯三標準", 山西農業大學學報, 6(6) (2007)
- 李廣榮, "嚴復的飜譯思想:中國現代文化開啓之源", 山西師大學報(社會科學版), 34(4) (2007)
- 李蟠, "談談嚴復的飜譯", 湖南師大社會學學報, (3) (1966)
- 李培恩, "論飜譯, In 飜譯硏究論文集 上冊", pp.281~ (1935)
- 李楊, "嚴復信達雅與泰特勒飜譯三原則之比較", 靑年文學家, (6) (2011)
- 林錄南, "中國當代飜譯百論", pp.739~ (1994), 重慶大學出版社
- 林本椿, "嚴復飜譯思想述評, 人文社會科學版", 福建論壇, (2) (2003)
- 張文淸, "嚴復的飜譯目的與選擇", 文敎資料, (30) (2005)
- 趙寶莹, "嚴復的信達雅與泰特勒的飜譯三原則", 語言硏究 (2011)
- 陳福康, "中國譯學理論史稿, 修訂本" (2000), 上海外語敎育出版社
- "論飜譯, In 飜譯論集", pp.401~ (1929), 飜譯論集
- 皮后鋒, "嚴復評傳", pp.10~42 (2006), 南京大學出版社
- 韓省之, "近代中國飜譯先驅嚴復", 僑報 (1997)
- 漢語大詞典編輯委員會, "漢語大詞典", pp.819~ (1993), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 胡適, "五十年來中國之文學, In 胡適文存", pp.115~118 (1922), 上海亞東圖書館出版
- 黃克武, "嚴復的飜譯: 近百年來中西學者的評論", 歷史硏究, 東南學術, (4) (1998)
- 黃偉芳, "飜譯規範與嚴復的飜譯", 湖北敎育學院學報, 23(3) (2006)
- 黃忠廉, "嚴復飜譯思想硏究百年回眸", 福建外語, (3) (1998)
- Alexander Fraser Tylter, "Essay on the Priniciple of Translation", ~
