본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

How Effective Listening and Constructing Peer Feedback Impact Oral Presentation Success

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study implemented two research instruments to examine student learning through effective listening and constructing peer feedback of EFL oral presentations. Using standards of assessment research, our quantitative analysis measured aspects of student cognitive and linguistic processes. Based on this analysis, the findings suggest peer observation, listening comprehension notetaking, and providing feedback commenting are effective methods of activating student-regulated learning in oral presentations. We found there are significant links between knowledge-structure and performance, and also among several sub-criteria, demonstrating student improvement in their ability to linguistically and cognitively assess EFL oral presentations, and to subsequently improve their own work. In addition, we found EFL students initially commented most upon nonverbal, meaning and new knowledge sub-criteria. In the presentation of their final exam, students’ comments turned to verbal, visual and structure sub-criteria implying there are significant effects of constructing peer feedback as a method for student-regulated learning. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the implemented methods can be employed in the field of EFL.

Abstract

This study implemented two research instruments to examine student learning through effective listening and constructing peer feedback of EFL oral presentations. Using standards of assessment research, our quantitative analysis measured aspects of student cognitive and linguistic processes. Based on this analysis, the findings suggest peer observation, listening comprehension notetaking, and providing feedback commenting are effective methods of activating student-regulated learning in oral presentations. We found there are significant links between knowledge-structure and performance, and also among several sub-criteria, demonstrating student improvement in their ability to linguistically and cognitively assess EFL oral presentations, and to subsequently improve their own work. In addition, we found EFL students initially commented most upon nonverbal, meaning and new knowledge sub-criteria. In the presentation of their final exam, students’ comments turned to verbal, visual and structure sub-criteria implying there are significant effects of constructing peer feedback as a method for student-regulated learning. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the implemented methods can be employed in the field of EFL.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. AlFallay, I., "The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self-and peer-assessment", System, 32(3), pp.407~425 (2004)
  2. Aryadoust, V., "Self-and peer assessments of oral presentations by first-year university students", Educational Assessment, 20(3), pp.199~225 (2015)
  3. Aryadoust, V., "Developing and validating an academic listening questionnaire", Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54(3), pp.227~ (2012)
  4. Boud, D., "Rethinking assessment for higher education: learning for the longer term", pp.3~13 (2007), Routledge
  5. Campbell, K. S., "Peer versus self assessment of oral business presentation performance", Business Communication Quarterly, 64(3), pp.23~40 (2001)
  6. Cheng, W., "Peer assessment of language proficiency", Language Testing, 22(1), pp.93~121 (2005)
  7. Cho, Y. H., "Peer reviewers learn from giving comments", Instructional Science, 39(5), pp.629~643 (2011)
  8. De Grez, L., "Peer assessment of oral presentation skills", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), pp.1776~1780 (2010)
  9. De Grez, L., "How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments?", Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), pp.129~142 (2012)
  10. Falchikov, N., "Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement-Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education" (2005), Routledge Falmer
  11. Falchikov, N., "Student peer assessment in higher education : A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks", Review of Educational Research, 70(3), pp.287~322 (2000)
  12. Kolb, A. Y., "The Learning Way-Meta-cognitive Aspects of Experiential Learning", Simulation & Gaming, 40(3), pp.297~327 (2009)
  13. Kolb, D., "Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development" (1984), Prentice Hall
  14. Langan, A. M., "Peer assessment of oral presentations : Effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), pp.21~34 (2005)
  15. Langan, A. M., "Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations", Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), pp.179~190 (2008)
  16. Liu, N., "Peer feedback-The learning element of peer assessment", Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), pp.279~290 (2006)
  17. Magin, D., "Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills- How reliable are they?", Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), pp.287~298 (2001)
  18. Nicol, D. J., "Formative assessment and self-regulated learning-A model and seven principles of good feedback practice", Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp.199~218 (2006)
  19. Nicol, D., "Rethinking feedback practices in higher education-A peer review perspective", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), pp.102~122 (2014)
  20. Otoshi, J., "Factors Predicting Effective Oral Presentations in EFL Classrooms", The Asian EFL Journal, 10(1), pp.65~78 (2008)
  21. Patri, M., "The influence of peer feedback on self-and peer-assessment of oral skills", Language Testing, 19(2), pp.109~131 (2002)
  22. Sadler, D. R., "Beyond feedback : developing student capability in complex appraisal", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), pp.535~550 (2010)
  23. Shin, D., "Analyzing media discourse on the development of the national english ability test(NEAT)in south korea", Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), pp.1~14 (2019)
  24. 신미영, "A Study of Portfolio-Combined Listening Strategy Instruction to College Students", 외국어교육연구, 33(1), pp.225~258 (2019), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
  25. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., "Peer assessment training in teacher education-effects on performance and perceptions", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), pp.443~454 (2002)
  26. Suñol, J. J., "Peer and self-assessment applied to oral presentations from a multidisciplinary perspective", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(4), pp.622~637 (2016)
  27. van Ginkel, S., "The impact of the feedback source on developing oral presentation competence", Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), pp.1671~1685 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)