“中國(듕귁)”과 “國之語音(나랏말ᄊᆞᆷ)”의 사이 - 鮮初 漢文·漢吏文·漢語와 訓民正音의 관계성을 중심으로
Languages of Sinographic Cosmopolis and Chosŏn’s Vernacular Alphabet
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines how fifteenth century Chosŏn ruling elites tried to use spoken and written languages to establish the royal house’s authority, which basically was the process of translation of the universal civilization of “Sinitic World” into Chosŏn’s soil. Conspicuous in early Chosŏn historical accounts is the dynasty’s preoccupation with language. King Sejong showed obsessive devotion to learning the spoken language of China proper. Diplomatic language of Hanliwen was a active component of study too. And ultimately, the Chosŏn phonetic alphabet (Kr. Hunminchŏng’ŭm 訓民正音) was systematized. However, because of the discourses on "National Language" in modern Korea, the central question – why the period saw such attention bestowed on learning Chinese and at the same time an attempt at creation of Chosŏn indigenous writing system – has not been answered by those scholars keen to understand the two phenomenal language issues as polar opposites, and to cast them as an inherent contradiction impossible to explain. Therefore, there is a need for a new perspective that transcends nationalism. In fact, the two functions Chosŏn alphabet served were to actualize the Ming court’s Shengjiao 聲教 through propagation of the Ming standardized language transliterated into the indigenous language, and to spread Chosŏn’s own sŏnggyo 聲教 with its indigenous language. These two roles, from a nationalist perspective, appear contradictory, but in reality, they shared a reciprocal relationship in the overall political scheme, with one being unable to do without the other.
Abstract
This paper examines how fifteenth century Chosŏn ruling elites tried to use spoken and written languages to establish the royal house’s authority, which basically was the process of translation of the universal civilization of “Sinitic World” into Chosŏn’s soil. Conspicuous in early Chosŏn historical accounts is the dynasty’s preoccupation with language. King Sejong showed obsessive devotion to learning the spoken language of China proper. Diplomatic language of Hanliwen was a active component of study too. And ultimately, the Chosŏn phonetic alphabet (Kr. Hunminchŏng’ŭm 訓民正音) was systematized. However, because of the discourses on "National Language" in modern Korea, the central question – why the period saw such attention bestowed on learning Chinese and at the same time an attempt at creation of Chosŏn indigenous writing system – has not been answered by those scholars keen to understand the two phenomenal language issues as polar opposites, and to cast them as an inherent contradiction impossible to explain. Therefore, there is a need for a new perspective that transcends nationalism. In fact, the two functions Chosŏn alphabet served were to actualize the Ming court’s Shengjiao 聲教 through propagation of the Ming standardized language transliterated into the indigenous language, and to spread Chosŏn’s own sŏnggyo 聲教 with its indigenous language. These two roles, from a nationalist perspective, appear contradictory, but in reality, they shared a reciprocal relationship in the overall political scheme, with one being unable to do without the other.
참고문헌 (35)
- "訓民正音 解例本", ~
- "洪武正韻譯訓", ~
- "東國正韻", ~
- "洪武正韻", ~
- "太祖實錄", ~
- "太宗實錄", ~
- "世宗實錄", ~
- "文宗實錄", ~
- "端宗實錄", ~
- "世祖實錄", ~
- "成宗 實錄", ~
- 송태욱, "일본정신의 기원- 언어, 국가, 대의제, 그리고 통화" (2003), 이매진
- 旗田巍, "日本人의 韓國觀" (1983), 一潮閣
- 김민수, "新國語學史" (1984), 一潮閣
- 김철, "식민지를 안고서" (2009), 역락
- 박원호, "明初朝鮮關係史硏究" (2002), 일조각
- 안병희, "國語史硏究" (1992), 문학과 지성사
- 吳晗, "朱元璋傳" (2002), 지식산업사
- 박경희, "만들어진 고대" (2001), 삼인
- 이연숙, "국어라는 사상" (2006), 소명출판
- 조너선 스펜스, "반역의 책" (2004), 이산
- 황호덕, "근대 네이션과 그 표상들-타자·교통·번역·에크리튀르" (2005), 소명출판
- 스테판 타나카, "일본 동양학의 구조" (2004), 문학과 지성사
- Andre Schmid, "Korea Between Empires 1895-1919" (2002), Columbia University Press
- Janhyun Kim, "Haboush, eds. Epistolrary Korea: letters in the communicative space of the Chosŏn, 1392-1910" (2009), Columbia University Press
- 계승범, "조선후기 조선중화주의와 그 해석 문제", 한국사연구, (159), pp.265~294 (2012), 한국사연구회
- 문중양, "세종대 과학기술의 ‘자주성’, 다시 보기", 역사학보, (189), pp.39~72 (2006), 역사학회
- 우경섭, "朝鮮中華主義에 대한 학설사적 검토", 한국사연구, (159), pp.237~263 (2012), 한국사연구회
- 이기문, "2. 훈민정음의 창제", 한국사, 26 (1995), 국사편찬위원회
- 이숭녕, "世宗의 言語政策에 關한 硏究", 細亞硏究, 1(2) (1958)
- 정다함, "朝鮮初期 習讀官 制度의 運營과 그 實態", 진단학보, (96), pp.33~72 (2003), 진단학회
- 정다함, "조선전기 양반 잡학겸수관 연구", 박사, 한국사학, pp.2008
- 정다함, "朝鮮初期 野人과 對馬島에 대한 藩籬 · 藩屛 認識의 형성과 敬差官의 파견", 동방학지, (141), pp.221~266 (2008), 국학연구원
- 정다함, "麗末鮮初의 동아시아 질서와 朝鮮에서의 漢語, 漢吏文, 訓民正音", 國史學報, 36 (2009)
- 정다함, "‘事大’와 ‘交隣’과 ‘小中華’라는 틀의 초시간적인 그리고 초공간적인 맥락", 韓國史學報, (42), pp.287~323 (2011), 고려사학회
