시, 숭고, 아레테 - 예술의 공공성에 대하여
Poetry, Sublime, Arete:A Study on Artistic Publicness
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Aesthetic snobbism comes from a recent trend in contemporary aesthetics that has overemphasized the newness. Lyotard's aesthetics of the sublime criticizes the ideal of Kant's aesthetics that pursues harmony and totality, and tries to keep its distance from the disaster of fascism having plagued the last century. Treating every attempt at representation as evil, he takes a point of view that the excellence(arete) is the only newness bringing about ruptures to harmonious form and any representation. Therefore, the art of the sublime appears as two kinds of activities:ironist activity and prophetic activity. Aesthetics of the sublime forbids both to lead to activity constructing a new life, since it is conceived as pursuing harmony and totality. I think, however, that we must not restrict the role of the art of the sublime only as announcement of disaster. The task to construct the new forms and relations of life also is the part and parcel of art, through which it can proceed to the area of publicness. Thus, it is more appropriate that the art of the sublime is defined as performing of 'aesthetics of movement', the point of which is 'trans-borders'. The activities of trans-borders appear not as the repeated presentations of impossibility of presenting the unpresentable, but as infinitely possible ways of presentation. If the activities of trans-borders is defined in such a way, whereby do we have the feeling of the sublime coming from frustration of imagination? The borders of art imply time and space of here-and-now, and through intrusion into such time and space, art can prove its possibility of new presentations beyond artist's imagination, the anonymous excellence of works of art. In this sense, we can say that two moments are inherent to works of art. The one is that when the works of art appear in the space where we can never obliterate the publicness, they increase their possibility of presentations. The other is that, as they appear, the space as such is changed and the new artistic publicness can be realized.
Abstract
Aesthetic snobbism comes from a recent trend in contemporary aesthetics that has overemphasized the newness. Lyotard's aesthetics of the sublime criticizes the ideal of Kant's aesthetics that pursues harmony and totality, and tries to keep its distance from the disaster of fascism having plagued the last century. Treating every attempt at representation as evil, he takes a point of view that the excellence(arete) is the only newness bringing about ruptures to harmonious form and any representation. Therefore, the art of the sublime appears as two kinds of activities:ironist activity and prophetic activity. Aesthetics of the sublime forbids both to lead to activity constructing a new life, since it is conceived as pursuing harmony and totality. I think, however, that we must not restrict the role of the art of the sublime only as announcement of disaster. The task to construct the new forms and relations of life also is the part and parcel of art, through which it can proceed to the area of publicness. Thus, it is more appropriate that the art of the sublime is defined as performing of 'aesthetics of movement', the point of which is 'trans-borders'. The activities of trans-borders appear not as the repeated presentations of impossibility of presenting the unpresentable, but as infinitely possible ways of presentation. If the activities of trans-borders is defined in such a way, whereby do we have the feeling of the sublime coming from frustration of imagination? The borders of art imply time and space of here-and-now, and through intrusion into such time and space, art can prove its possibility of new presentations beyond artist's imagination, the anonymous excellence of works of art. In this sense, we can say that two moments are inherent to works of art. The one is that when the works of art appear in the space where we can never obliterate the publicness, they increase their possibility of presentations. The other is that, as they appear, the space as such is changed and the new artistic publicness can be realized.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김미경, "다니엘 뷔렝의 제안(proposition), In 현대미술의 동향2" (1994), 눈빛
- 김영나, "클레멘트 그린버그의 미술이론과 비평", 서양미술사학회 논문집, 8 (1996), 시공사
- 양은희, "식사하세요!: 리크리트 티라바니자의 태국요리 접대와 세계공동체 만들기", 현대미술사연구, (20), pp.5~5 (2006), 현대미술사학회
- 오희숙, "칸트의 음악미학", 음악이론연구, 9 (2004)
- "냉전 문화전쟁의 무기로 이용된 ‘전위’" (2009), 이주헌[URL]
- 김예령, "숭고에 대하여" (2005), 문학과지성사
- 모리스블랑쇼, "미래의 책" (1993), 세계사
- 발터벤야민, "일방통행로" (2007), 새물결
- 수전손택, "우울한 열정" (2005), 시울
- 자크랑시에르, "미학 안의 불편함" (2008), 인간사랑
- 장프랑수아리오타르, "포스트모던의 조건" (1992), 민음사
- 피에르부르디, "예술의 규칙" (1999), 동문선
- 피에르부르디, "구별짓기: 문화와 취향의 사회학" (2005), 새물결
- 한나 아렌트, "인간의 조건" (1996), 한길사
