L’attitude de Kim Tong-in face à la création littéraire et au rôle de la littérature
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kim Tong-in belongs to the generation of writers who, in the early 1920s, thrived to give Korea a modern literature. Unlike writers from the West who built modernity against tradition, Korean literature had no tradition to build itself against, ancient literature being written in classical chinese. Therefore in order to achieve modernity, they had to create a whole new literature out of nothing, or so they said. The first steps had been made by the generation right above, with the so-called Enlightenment literature, led by Yi Kwangsu who thought of literature as a way to teach modernity to the people. Yet the (moral) modernity put forward by Yi Kwangsu and the (literary) modernity sought after by the young writers of the 1920 was quite different. Kim Tong-in set himself apart from other writers as he didn’t satisfy himself with the general view of what modern literature should be like. Whereas other writers leaned towards realism and naturalism, Kim Tong-in thought of these trends as mere tools to create a work of modern literature. In other words, to Kim Tong-in’s eyes, literary modernity could not be reduced to realism. This is why literary critics and historians of Korean literature have struggled to define in a coherent manner Kim Tong-in’s literary world. He seems to be all over the places, leaning towards realism, then switching to eastheticism, before getting into romanticism or even nationalism. Instead of trying to define Kim Tong-in literary world in terms of literary trends as it has been done up untill now, we should try to grasp it in a more comprehensive way in order to seize its coherence within all these apparent incoherence. This article proposes to view Kim Tong-in’s approach to writing as an experimental approach. And by experimental, we don’t refer to modernism and avant-garde literary experimentations as much as a general attitude towards the very act of writing. In his search for literary modernity, Kim Tong-in, we believe, experimented with various trends, various concepts, looking for an answer to what literary modernity should be and without getting ever satisfied with one single answer. In his quest, two elements remained throughout his literary journey: 1. the belief that writing is an art form and therefore subjected to certain skills and techniques; 2. the dedication to give his country the literature that could best represent it.
Abstract
Kim Tong-in belongs to the generation of writers who, in the early 1920s, thrived to give Korea a modern literature. Unlike writers from the West who built modernity against tradition, Korean literature had no tradition to build itself against, ancient literature being written in classical chinese. Therefore in order to achieve modernity, they had to create a whole new literature out of nothing, or so they said. The first steps had been made by the generation right above, with the so-called Enlightenment literature, led by Yi Kwangsu who thought of literature as a way to teach modernity to the people. Yet the (moral) modernity put forward by Yi Kwangsu and the (literary) modernity sought after by the young writers of the 1920 was quite different. Kim Tong-in set himself apart from other writers as he didn’t satisfy himself with the general view of what modern literature should be like. Whereas other writers leaned towards realism and naturalism, Kim Tong-in thought of these trends as mere tools to create a work of modern literature. In other words, to Kim Tong-in’s eyes, literary modernity could not be reduced to realism. This is why literary critics and historians of Korean literature have struggled to define in a coherent manner Kim Tong-in’s literary world. He seems to be all over the places, leaning towards realism, then switching to eastheticism, before getting into romanticism or even nationalism. Instead of trying to define Kim Tong-in literary world in terms of literary trends as it has been done up untill now, we should try to grasp it in a more comprehensive way in order to seize its coherence within all these apparent incoherence. This article proposes to view Kim Tong-in’s approach to writing as an experimental approach. And by experimental, we don’t refer to modernism and avant-garde literary experimentations as much as a general attitude towards the very act of writing. In his search for literary modernity, Kim Tong-in, we believe, experimented with various trends, various concepts, looking for an answer to what literary modernity should be and without getting ever satisfied with one single answer. In his quest, two elements remained throughout his literary journey: 1. the belief that writing is an art form and therefore subjected to certain skills and techniques; 2. the dedication to give his country the literature that could best represent it.
참고문헌 (16)
- Ch’oe Sŏhae, "Faim et carnage, Vol.1" (1987), Munhak-gwachisŏngsa
- Hyŏn Chin-gŏn, "Visages de la Corée" (1988), Munhak-gwachisŏngsa
- Kang In-suk, "Etude sur les personnages de nouvelles", dans la revue Sinsang, (été) (1969)
- Kim Ch’isu, "Relecture de l’esthétisme et du réalisme de Kim Tong-in", dans la revue Munhak sasang (1972)
- Kim Chong-hu, "L’ambition del’écrivain – sur Kim Tong-in", dans la revue Hyŏndae munhak (1956)
- 김시몽, "Le Réalisme de la Vraisemblance - la création littéraire chez Kim Tong-in à la lumière des théories de Guy de Maupassant", 비교문학, (64), pp.357~378 (2014), 한국비교문학회
- Kim Sŏk-ha, "Ideas of Paradise in Korean Literature", dans la revue Korea Journal (1974)
- Kim Tong-in, "Kim Tong-in chŏnjib, vol.6" (1976), Samjungdang
- Kim Wŏn-jung, "Etude sur KimTong-in", dans la revue Kuk-ŏ kugmunhak yŏn’gu, (3) (1959)
- Kim Yun-sik, "Etude sur Kim Tong-in" (2000), Minŭmsa
- Kwŏn Podŭlae, "Han’guk kŭndaesosŏl-ŭi kiwŏn" (2000), Somyŏng ch’ulp’ansa
- O’Rourke, Kevin, "The Korean Short Story of 1920’s and Naturalism", dans la revue Korea Journal, 17(3) (1977)
- Pak Yŏng-hŭi, "Histoire de la littérature coréenne contemporaine", dans la revue Sasanggye, (67) (1959)
- Sin Tong-uk, "Hyŏn Chin-gŏn and His Literature", Korea Journal, 16(5) (1976)
- Song Min-ho, "Les Univers littérairesd’Yi Kwang-su et Kim Tong-in", dans Korea Journal (1976)
- Yi Sŏn-yŏng, "Ethique et esthétique", dans la revue Hyŏndaemunhak (1969)
